Beechcraft T6 Texan II accident
#11
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Sure enough, I ripped some stanchions out of the ground and overstressed the cable itself, but both the cable and hook held. Had to replace the seat's inertial reel also because that got jammed up - I had to release my harness to raise the hook, but I taxied back to chocks after they slingshotted me. The cable had to be replaced, but the hook just got NDI'd. Lots of motrin for my neck afterwards.
#12
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: J3 to CL600; retired doing instrument taining
Posts: 78
Tried to read what I can on Internet on T6 Texan II systems. Not much is out there other than basic specifications. Any good articles on internet that someone can post on APC board ?
Assume aircraft does not have reverse (to mimic a Jet) and no anti-skid brakes system also? Anything else enter into the picture here ? Is blowing a tire on landing a problem?
cub
Assume aircraft does not have reverse (to mimic a Jet) and no anti-skid brakes system also? Anything else enter into the picture here ? Is blowing a tire on landing a problem?
cub
#13
We all know in the heat of the battle, you've got to keep things simple. Having ejection criteria that changes daily isn't "awesome" and probably won't work out real well eventually.
#14
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Really???? I was always under the impression that black&white, 1 or zero type ejection criteria was best. If you're on fire and fire persists, eject. If you're departing the prepared surface above a certain speed, eject. I realize the scenarios can add plenty of variables but you probably shouldn't have too long a laundry list of "if this, then thats", IMO.
We all know in the heat of the battle, you've got to keep things simple. Having ejection criteria that changes daily isn't "awesome" and probably won't work out real well eventually.
We all know in the heat of the battle, you've got to keep things simple. Having ejection criteria that changes daily isn't "awesome" and probably won't work out real well eventually.
Made a lot of sense in that trap.
#15
Really???? I was always under the impression that black&white, 1 or zero type ejection criteria was best. If you're on fire and fire persists, eject. If you're departing the prepared surface above a certain speed, eject. I realize the scenarios can add plenty of variables but you probably shouldn't have too long a laundry list of "if this, then thats", IMO.
We all know in the heat of the battle, you've got to keep things simple. Having ejection criteria that changes daily isn't "awesome" and probably won't work out real well eventually.
We all know in the heat of the battle, you've got to keep things simple. Having ejection criteria that changes daily isn't "awesome" and probably won't work out real well eventually.
#16
Yeah, all that seat did was make a loud bang. That would scare the airplane into ducking a few feet, and you would float clear.
#17
I totally agree and that's what I did as well. I guess what I'm saying is that my criteria didn't change "daily" as the other guy said. I briefed it daily, discussed it in EP sims and evaluations and just thought it over at zero airspeed. I had certain scenarios that I knew were going to result in me pulling the handles if I encountered them. The reasons for making that big decision can't "change daily", IMO. Change your criteria enough and it'll get muddled up in the heat of battle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post