Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Asiana 777 Crash at SFO >

Asiana 777 Crash at SFO

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Asiana 777 Crash at SFO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2013, 02:21 PM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Bligh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 786
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggy1970 View Post
When your that far behind the power curve with that high of an AOA there is nothing in the world that could save you. Question to ask is why they allowed the airplane to get that slow, was the F/O and RO asleep? Basic Airmanship left that cockpit long before they packed a perfectly good airplane in!
Remember that sim scenario I mentioned where we did all the visual pattern stuff? One of the things in that module was an extremely high deck angle recovery at low altitude. I specifically remember being at full thrust with a deck angle of near or over 30 degrees aircraft nose up and an indicated speed of near 90 knots. The airplane was still flying and was able to both climb and recover to a more normal attitude. Intermittent stick shaker activation and kissing the whiskers of the pitch limit indicator was part of the profile.

Extreme? No doubt and who knows how accurate the sim replicates, but with exposure to those extremes in the training environment, at the very least there's more encouragement to not let it happen in the first place.
Captain Bligh is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 02:43 PM
  #292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: B777 x2 furloughed from United
Posts: 180
Default Ua855

The people on UA855 were so lucky not to be involved. Any news from the crew on what they saw? I saw the video on CNN.

I saw them getting towed back. Must of been horrific for the passengers to watch and then be helpless to act and help out.

This could have been so much worse. Sorry for 2 deaths and those critically injured.
unitedflyier is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 02:54 PM
  #293  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15andMD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 792
Default

Originally Posted by Radials Rule
...I use manual thrust for hand flown approaches and landings whenever I can. Otherwise, I feel like I'm rusting and that I would subconsciously pay less attention to airspeed in my scan.
Yea, I understand what you're saying about rusty but...not impressed. For a ferry flt sure. But a revenue flt no! I've watched guys shut-off the automation. "Look what a good pilot I am." What do you think the media's and the company's reaction will be when they learn you have the automation off and you were, God forbid, involved in a mishap. Especially those with safety redundancies like auto throttles. You'd be hung out to dry. Just wait until we learn Asiana had AT off. The pilots will be even more roasted. IMO once you're in the big leagues flying heavy metal those "look at me" days are over!! For your passengers sake!! Sorry, I'll get off my soap box. Just my safety training.
F15andMD11 is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:01 PM
  #294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by F15andMD11 View Post
Yea, I understand what you're saying about rusty but...not impressed. For a ferry flt sure. But a revenue flt no! I've watched guys shut-off the automation. "Look what a good pilot I am." What do you think the media's and the company's reaction will be when they learn you have the automation off and you were, God forbid, involved in a mishap. Especially those with safety redundancies like auto throttles. You'd be hung out to dry. Just wait until we learn Asiana had AT off. The pilots will be even more roasted. IMO once you're in the big leagues flying heavy metal those "look at me" days are over!! For your passengers sake!! Sorry, I'll get off my soap box. Just my safety training.
Your mentality is a bit bizarre in my opinion, as a pilot should be expected and trained to use the level of automation that is appropriate to the situation.

Stubbornly refusing to ever turn the automation off earlier than usual is not appropriate and there are plenty of scenarios where no automation is called for.

I will never fly the LGA Expressway Visual 31 or DCA River Visual 19 with the autopilot.

Do you think I am reckless?

It's not about "look at me I can fly." I'm not sure where you get that, but it's not from any of the pilots I've ever sat next to in 121 so far.

It's about maintaing some semblance of stick and rudder skills because not matter what your airplane's automation can do, you need to be able to do the same -- because some computer chip may have other plans for you on the arrival some day and you're gonna be back to the basics until the wheels are on the ground.
contrails is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:03 PM
  #295  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Want(ed) to be an Airline Pilot
Posts: 43
Default training help

Speaking only in the USA/ FAA structured airlines, some more specific SIM training could help us all. Unless your company has a custom SIM training program approved by the FAA you get the "canned" training wherein the FAA dictates exactly what has to be covered for each PC/PT event. Usually making the SIM time rushed and without the luxury of trying anything ourside of the FAA training curriculum.
BE02Driverz is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:09 PM
  #296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,708
Default

I'll just say that from the outside it's easy to sit here and say, how could this happen? But having been flown a brain dead approach after a pacific crossing and having seen some of the stupid stuff that guys do when they are dead tired I have to say that yeah I can see how you could get started down that road.
The major cultural difference being that you'd have one or two or three others guys forcefully pointing out your error before it became dangerous. Or so we'd hope any way.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:11 PM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DiamondZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by BE02Driverz View Post
Speaking only in the USA/ FAA structured airlines, some more specific SIM training could help us all. Unless your company has a custom SIM training program approved by the FAA you get the "canned" training wherein the FAA dictates exactly what has to be covered for each PC/PT event. Usually making the SIM time rushed and without the luxury of trying anything ourside of the FAA training curriculum.
Costs $$$.

Every airline is trying to cut costs on 'additional' training above required minimums.
DiamondZ is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:16 PM
  #298  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by F15andMD11 View Post
Yea, I understand what you're saying about rusty but...not impressed. For a ferry flt sure. But a revenue flt no! I've watched guys shut-off the automation. "Look what a good pilot I am." What do you think the media's and the company's reaction will be when they learn you have the automation off and you were, God forbid, involved in a mishap. Especially those with safety redundancies like auto throttles. You'd be hung out to dry. Just wait until we learn Asiana had AT off. The pilots will be even more roasted. IMO once you're in the big leagues flying heavy metal those "look at me" days are over!! For your passengers sake!! Sorry, I'll get off my soap box. Just my safety training.
Sorry I turn off the automation not to say look what a good pilot I am but to keep skill levels for times when the automation might not be available. I guess do it how you like but there are many in the training areas that are concerned with pilots being to reliant on automation, but hey to each their own I guess.
syd111 is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:19 PM
  #299  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Things happen fast in the flare, and even the best captain/check airman might not be able to save the day, even though they are always held accountable. At SFO they didn't get low and slow in a split second, somebody should have seen that coming.

At 7s prior to impact, the reported airspeed call was a completely inappropriate call. It should have been "unstable, go around" instead.
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 07-08-2013, 03:20 PM
  #300  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15andMD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 792
Default

It's not about "look at me I can fly." I'm not sure where you get that, but it's not from any of the pilots I've ever sat next to in 121 so far.
Because I have sat next to one or two.
Valid point, of course you shut-off AP when required. I'm just thinking about the AT I guess.
F15andMD11 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM
Piloto Noche
Cargo
46
12-02-2007 10:16 PM
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices