Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
Malaysian 777 missing >

Malaysian 777 missing

Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

Malaysian 777 missing

Old 03-16-2014, 07:12 AM
  #411  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead View Post
Been sitting on the sidelines just reading this thread, but I find it highly unlikely an aircraft of that size would be able to penetrate anywhere near a high profile target within the US. I mean there are so many radar facilities that would have to miss and/or otherwise ignore it.

Africa is the exception here because of minimal radar coverage and a lack of intercept ability, but after that what route could these would-be terrorists use to sneak into US airspace?

Just hypothesizing here...
It would be really tough. Safe to assume that NORAD is now sitting up straight and paying attention until this aircraft is positively located.

9/11 worked because they were already inside the ADIZ, they were legit commercial flights to start with, there was mass confusion, and no precedent or standing orders allowing airliner shootdown. Nonetheless a flight of F-15's almost caught up with the plane that hit the second tower.

They would have to fly high for most of the flight for fuel burn, but could conceivably go to the deck to avoid ATC radar for the last bit. Much tougher for an inbound to avoid military radar though...especially since every cruiser and destroyer in the navy has Aegis, and they can all easily switch that on at sea or in port.

If one knew exactly where there might be thin spots in NORAD coverage you might be able to slip in under the wire but how would the bad guys know if or where any hypothetical holes exist?

But the baddies may not know what they don't know, so I'm not saying they wouldn't try. Their odds would be better if the world was still under the assumption that the airplane crashed.

To me this is starting to smell like hijacking, possibly with the intent of hiding the plane for later WMD duty, followed by a flight 91 scenario splashing the plane in the IO.

Last edited by rickair7777; 03-16-2014 at 07:24 AM.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:17 AM
  #412  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd View Post
Does anybody here know if the door is reinforced and locked from inside as in our domestic carriers? The decision to have a friend to ride in the cockpit could lead to this sort of thing, which by some reports was done before.

Even if someone here knows, lets not talk at this level of detail. At least not until the media reports it.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:22 AM
  #413  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default

Incredible, 413 posts of theories, guesses and hunches, including some racial undertones and a witch-hunt mentality. One thing we can all agree on is that we can't find it and we don't know for sure what happened to it.

And yes, sir, "some-thing-is-wrong" with your cave like, intolerant mentality.

Last edited by TheFly; 03-16-2014 at 07:36 AM.
TheFly is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:30 AM
  #414  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 974
Default

Originally Posted by satpak77 View Post
Daytime....

Same deal with Helios 522, intercepted around noontime.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:34 AM
  #415  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bilsch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: FAA ATSI VSRP ERC
Posts: 218
Default

Originally Posted by FLY6584 View Post
...but we do know someone took control of it and attempted to hide the fact they had control of it.
You know this how?
Bilsch is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:35 AM
  #416  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 381
Default

I sure hope the pilot(s) didn't pull this one off. If they did can you imagine what DHS would do to pilots? Lie-detector tests every 4 months etc, etc.


BTW - The pres. said the terrorist are on their heels.
BizPilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 07:37 AM
  #417  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Going2Baja's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Driving to work & Looking Left @ the Surf!!
Posts: 727
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post

Unless some 777 dudes have a good explanation how pilots fighting a problem could accidentally load an old flight plan into the FMS (maybe while trying to return to land), deliberate action is now probably the horse in the lead.
Route 2 - Execute - Activate? But not likely.

Baja.
Going2Baja is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 08:31 AM
  #418  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,258
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
It would be really tough. Safe to assume that NORAD is now sitting up straight and paying attention until this aircraft is positively located.

9/11 worked because they were already inside the ADIZ, they were legit commercial flights to start with, there was mass confusion, and no precedent or standing orders allowing airliner shootdown. Nonetheless a flight of F-15's almost caught up with the plane that hit the second tower.

They would have to fly high for most of the flight for fuel burn, but could conceivably go to the deck to avoid ATC radar for the last bit. Much tougher for an inbound to avoid military radar though...especially since every cruiser and destroyer in the navy has Aegis, and they can all easily switch that on at sea or in port.

If one knew exactly where there might be thin spots in NORAD coverage you might be able to slip in under the wire but how would the bad guys know if or where any hypothetical holes exist?

But the baddies may not know what they don't know, so I'm not saying they wouldn't try. Their odds would be better if the world was still under the assumption that the airplane crashed.

To me this is starting to smell like hijacking, possibly with the intent of hiding the plane for later WMD duty, followed by a flight 91 scenario splashing the plane in the IO.
A Cuban Air Force pilot flew a MIG23 from Cuba to Key West and no one saw him coming until a Navy pilot in the pattern asked if the MIG that just cut him off was cleared to land. Later the same pilot flew a Cessna back to Cuba and picked up his family and returned to the US without being detected.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 08:35 AM
  #419  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,032
Default

Asking questions is one thing. Jumping to conclusions is another. There are so few facts in this case that any conclusions beyond, "it didn't land where it was supposed to" and "something happened to the transponders" is irresponsible. It was only recently confirmed that AN airplane flew west over the islands that many believe most likely is MH370. Beyond that, not a single person on this board is qualified to speculate on intent, motive, or responsible parties since there is literally zero information from what happened during the flight. I would prefer we all stick to the facts because the "tin-foil hat" people are making this counter-productive.

For those that think Pakistan or Iran is responsible, wouldn't it just make more sense for a national actor to just buy an old widebody (i.e. DC-10) to turn into a bomb rather than going through an elaborate hijacking?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 03-16-2014, 08:40 AM
  #420  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,032
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
A Cuban Air Force pilot flew a MIG23 from Cuba to Key West and no one saw him coming until a Navy pilot in the pattern asked if the MIG that just cut him off was cleared to land. Later the same pilot flew a Cessna back to Cuba and picked up his family and returned to the US without being detected.
And the Japanese led a sneak attack on the Naval Headquarters at Pearl Harbor. You're neglecting to include a time frame. The incident you are citing is a quarter-century old. I would think that our air defense radar has improved since the end of the Cold War.
CBreezy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roll Inverted and Pull
Major
8
03-04-2008 06:36 PM
boost
Cargo
1
02-01-2008 03:38 PM
Dog Breath
Hangar Talk
8
09-13-2007 08:48 AM
madfoxjay
Part 135
8
09-06-2007 08:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices