Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Safety
F-16 and single piston collide >

F-16 and single piston collide

Search
Notices
Safety Accidents, suggestions on improving safety, etc

F-16 and single piston collide

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2015, 08:24 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 974
Default F-16 and single piston collide

Details very scant, anybody know? Interrupted on hospital TVs.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 09:19 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Live: F-16, small plane collide, crash in Berkeley County, officials say | Local News - Home

The Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement Tuesday that the fighter jet collided with a Cessna C150 at about 11 a.m. The collision happened about 11 miles north of Charleston.

Col. Cindi King of the South Carolina Air National Guard says the F-16 involved in the crash did not belong to the Guard.
RI830 is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 12:32 PM
  #3  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein View Post
How come the F16 dude didn't pick up the Cessna on his APG-68 or his Sniper pod?
Google "Doppler notch" and "velocity gate" for some enlightening reading.

AI radars are not magic.

Neither are IR/EO pods with toilet-paper-tube fields of view. Try randomly searching the sky with a telescope to find pop-up traffic.

These radars don't run around in auto-acquisition modes, they require search volumes to be set and monitored if you really want to find something. Unless the pilot is heads-down and purposefully operating the radar and searching, there is just no way a small-RCS, slow-moving aircraft is going to be noticed. That's ESPECIALLY true if the pilot is looking outside and staying visual with a flight lead or wingman while in VMC.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 01:36 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 974
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein View Post
Fair enough, but since the Shooters fly Block 50 Vipers, do you think his HTS would have gotten any hits from the Cessna's Mode3 returns?
The Cessna may have been legally operating without a transponder, I don't think they were 30 miles from Bravo. Incidents like this may accelerate ADS-B use. Does the military monitor ADS-B or TIS currently? Obviously very unlikely a C150 would have ADS-B out.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:03 PM
  #5  
Slowing to holding speed
 
Nextlife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Position: middle seat
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein View Post
Fair enough. But since the Shooters fly Block 50 Vipers, do you think his HTS would have gotten any hits from the Cessna's Mode3 returns?
Not what an HTS pod does. So it wouldn't help.
Nextlife is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:08 PM
  #6  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by cardiomd View Post
The Cessna may have been legally operating without a transponder, I don't think they were 30 miles from Bravo. Incidents like this may accelerate ADS-B use. Does the military monitor ADS-B or TIS currently? Obviously very unlikely a C150 would have ADS-B out.
Hell, most US fighters aren't even RVSM capable, or even have TCAS. I wouldn't look for them to be sporting ADS-B for a long, long time, and even then only if the FAA forces it.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:13 PM
  #7  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein View Post
Fair enough. But since the Shooters fly Block 50 Vipers, do you think his HTS would have gotten any hits from the Cessna's Mode3 returns?
HTS is designed to receive and locate fixed radar sites, not occasional low-power moving encrypted replies for a radar system.

It would be like asking "why didn't my AM radio pick up the FM broadcast station when I drove past it?" Not compatible.

Vipers now have IFF interrogation abilty, but unless he was looking for a specific squawk, I don't think it will show.

Hollywood makes radar and "technology" all-knowing. But it takes TIME to sweep a volume of airspace. I'll take exception to Hacker's "toilet paper tube" analogy and call it a "McDonald's Straw."

If they were doing Air Combat maneuvering, you can gain or lose 10,000 feet in 20 seconds....the radar or eyeballs aren't going to see it in time.

I don't know what happened here, but my two biggest fears in pointy jets with civilians were them flying VFR through my MOA (legal, but not smart), or low-levels, where radar was cluttered, and TCAS was often blocked by transponder line of sight.

RIP to the vicims. Nickel on the grass.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:23 PM
  #8  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

Better, but still not magic.

google "raster scan."
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:28 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
cardiomd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Seat: Vegan friendly faux leather
Posts: 974
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
Hell, most US fighters aren't even RVSM capable, or even have TCAS. I wouldn't look for them to be sporting ADS-B for a long, long time, and even then only if the FAA forces it.
Agreed. Very different mission. I'd imagine ultimately FAA will force it though as the tech will ultimately become completely trivial cost and size (even at gvt rates ) and, possibly prevent stuff like this domestically. IIRC a cherokee pilot was decapitated several decades ago in a military overtake, and also there was a prominent collision out west in the 1980's if I remember right that killed a politician.

Wondering, how often are you in military radar contact when maneuvering in MOA, versus occasionally on own?

Early reports indicate the military jet was "on final" but who knows what that could mean.
cardiomd is offline  
Old 07-07-2015, 02:38 PM
  #10  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by Fegelein View Post
Block 50s have Link 16. You'd think they could datalink civilian radar returns to the jet to enhance SA.
Notwithstanding the technical barriers to porting FAA radar data into a classified, encrypted JTIDS network (that isn't even a stable, enduring network when outside of a combat zone, but instead an ad-hoc network between aircraft that happen to be airborne at the same time and not connected to anything on the ground)...

Surveillance radar returns are not high enough fidelity to provide reliable 3-dimensional cues for display in a helmet. It is only AI radars, with faster scan rates and the ability to single-target-track, that provide track data good enough to create a "TD container".
Hacker15e is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices