Mass exodus

Subscribe
25  31  32  33  34  35 
Page 35 of 35
Go to
Quote: Its’s naive to think that you can force FedEx to offer more in the current environment and under the RLA.
It is naive to believe this concessionary bankruptcy style proposal can be forced on a crew force of 3100 that have been hired since 2015, forcing them to vote in qol concessions, depress wages and leave behind the countless retirees in this A plan improvement scheme.

it is almost unconscionable that the folks who built this company who have retired since amenable date thru 29 May will be refused this compensation!

May the Fourth be with you, tomorrow we vote.

NO is the time!
Reply
Quote: Its’s naive to think that you can force FedEx to offer more in the current environment and under the RLA.
No, it's naive to believe you can't. It's defeatist and naive to believe that you have to accept whatever scraps they throw your way. If you don't value your contribution to the company, why should they?
Reply
Quote: Its’s naive to think that you can force FedEx to offer more in the current environment and under the RLA.
Are you on the company's negotiating team?
Reply
Quote: Its’s naive to think that you can force FedEx to offer more in the current environment and under the RLA.
It's naive to think that we don't deserve Delta + from a company that makes far more than Delta +
Reply
Quote: If FedEx is going to lose 1800 pilots, why would they care if new hires have the MCBP?? There won’t be any.
They don't care about MCBP. All they care about is eliminating the A fund going forward...
Reply
25  31  32  33  34  35 
Page 35 of 35
Go to