There is an assumption in many threads that EVERY regional pilot aspires to be a major/legacy Captain with the associated "big bucks." How true is this ?
I once attended a class where an unwelcomed young bearded college professor told 500 mid level military officers what was wrong with the Air Force. He started by saying, "You don't have enough dumb people !" An hour later he got a standing ovation. Dumb was a metaphore for folks who don't seek advanced education and promotion (UPWARD MOBILITY).
You bring a guy named Charlie out of the hills, give him boots, a uniform, three square meals a day, roof over his head and teach him to be a crew bus driver. He is in heaven and the best driver you got. After three years you tell Charlie (and all the drivers) they have to attend supervisory management school so they can be in charge of the motorpool. Only one can be in charge.
Charlie says, "No boss. I just want to be the best crew bus driver and retire in twenty years then go back to the hills where I'll be somebody." You then rate him as unmotivated, kick him out after four years and go back to the hills for another crew bus driver.
WHY NOT LET HIM SPEND HIS CAREEER DRIVING THE BUS ?
The professor then turned to the mostly pilot audience and said, "Each of you left the cockpit and is here to get advanced management training so you can be a squadron commander. A small percentage will make it. Yet this is the only way you can advance in rank."
WHY DON'T THEY LET YOU SPEND A CAREER FLYING AIRCRAFT ?
I suspect many regional pilots, once they reach a certain income and quality of life level, ask themselves, "Why leave ?" How many think this way, I don't know. If the numbers are significant, it could cause eventual hiring shortages in the majors. There is an old expression, "If you shine like a diamond in a goat's a**, why change ?"
WHY NOT SPEND A CAREER FLYING FOR THE REGIONALS ?