Uh oh

Subscribe
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to
Because of our letter UA is going to cancel our Jumpseat agreement

Sorry guys. I miscalculated
Reply
Savagely Mainline SA
Reply
What letter?
Reply
Not going to happen. I don’t see a issue with the proposed UA plan. It only removes the TOC requirement, so not a big deal. Regardless I suspect a JS war would hurt UA just as much. My understanding is it would be all Republic aircraft, and not just the UAX birds. don’t commute though, so there’s that....
Reply
Quote: Because of our letter UA is going to cancel our Jumpseat agreement

Sorry guys. I miscalculated
Lol fine, let them cancel the agreement. We’ll see how long it lasts when they realize there’s a lot more mainline guys commuting to ORD and EWR from BUF, MSP, SDF, etc. Good luck finding a 737 between ORD and and BUF regularly. Oh, and when they realize they can’t go down the terminal to commute on “American” because that’s still Republic maybe their tune will change.
Reply
Wouldn't make a difference for most pilots with us anyways. Most of our group commutes from cities served by us and alot of UAL guys. United has a worthless non rev system and is consistently oversold in my experience. Ive flown with 777 captains who came up and said they had to buy confirmed seats to get on
Reply
Quote: What letter?
I second the motion...... What Letter?
Reply
Quote: Lol fine, let them cancel the agreement. We’ll see how long it lasts when they realize there’s a lot more mainline guys commuting to ORD and EWR from BUF, MSP, SDF, etc. Good luck finding a 737 between ORD and and BUF regularly. Oh, and when they realize they can’t go down the terminal to commute on “American” because that’s still Republic maybe their tune will change.
They will remove us from CASS. We won’t be able to get on our own flights if they are UA code and AMR is removing is in support too.
Reply
Quote: They will remove us from CASS. We won’t be able to get on our own flights if they are UA code and AMR is removing is in support too.


Who’s removing us from CASS? You make no sense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Quote: Not going to happen. I don’t see a issue with the proposed UA plan. It only removes the TOC requirement, so not a big deal. Regardless I suspect a JS war would hurt UA just as much. My understanding is it would be all Republic aircraft, and not just the UAX birds. don’t commute though, so there’s that....


You don’t commute so you don’t care....[emoji849]

Also, the issue with the “proposed” plan is that it is a demand. Jumpseat agreements are negotiated reciprocal agreements. This would violate that. Please educate yourself before posting nonsense.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
1  2  3 
Page 1 of 3
Go to