Quote:
Originally Posted by C-17 Driver
How bad is it for the rest of y’all?
I know it's a different "pot of money," but the ANG increased the number of AFTPs from 48 to 72. This will be the first year I wasn't able to use all my UTAs/AFTPs simply because I don't want to work that much. So one component is flat broke while another hands out extra pay cards...ain't fiscal policy lovely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyPurple
In addition, some locations are allowing the TRs to burn some (not all) TPs for Sep, but instructing the ARTs not not burn any TPs...because they already have a Civ paycheck.
Airline apps are being drafted as we speak as a result.
AFRC: You already have a CIV paycheck, don't burn TPs.
ART: (Applies and gets hired at DAL/FDX/UAL) No, NOW I have a CIV paycheck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
Don’t know if it’s still true, but there used to be a perverse incentive to waste money and fuel as the end of a fiscal year approached. Failure to expend every resource would mean that you could afford a cut in your future allocation, and nobody wanted that.
We used to do this. However, we've started turning back unused flying hours and it hasn't had an impact on our next years allocation. Common sense has prevailed in some locations.