CRJ IOE wait time
#31
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 63
Last I’ve heard they’ve checked out some more LCAs. But, I’ve also read on here that an FO had multiple trips with different LCAs they weren’t even utilizing for IOE for some odd reason. It’s getting pretty frustrating at this point with all of the conflicting information
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 266
Last I’ve heard they’ve checked out some more LCAs. But, I’ve also read on here that an FO had multiple trips with different LCAs they weren’t even utilizing for IOE for some odd reason. It’s getting pretty frustrating at this point with all of the conflicting information
#33
My APD had said that a major choke point was the FAA’s lack of staffing which makes sense. I have a feeling that’s contributing to delays I imagine
#34
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 63
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,174
You guys need to keep in mind that one of the big issues here is that there are a bunch First Officers that want to upgrade but don't have their 1000 hours yet. If they keep getting displaced for new hires it doesn't help the situation and only makes things worse. The priority needs to be getting the pilots close to 1000 over that number. We've got pilots that are nearly half-way up the seniority list that don't have the time yet.
#37
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 63
You guys need to keep in mind that one of the big issues here is that there are a bunch First Officers that want to upgrade but don't have their 1000 hours yet. If they keep getting displaced for new hires it doesn't help the situation and only makes things worse. The priority needs to be getting the pilots close to 1000 over that number. We've got pilots that are nearly half-way up the seniority list that don't have the time yet.
I don’t mind getting paid to sit around and do nothing, but I’m not sure it’s doing much to help. I feel maybe putting a couple FOs on IOE every other week would balance it out a bit if the LCA staffing becomes sufficient
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
While that is all true, I just don’t think that pushing a lot of new hires through training and having them sit out 4-6 months while paying them is very cost effective for the company, and that’s not including the sim time we’ll need for requalification and all of the accommodations that come with that.
I don’t mind getting paid to sit around and do nothing, but I’m not sure it’s doing much to help. I feel maybe putting a couple FOs on IOE every other week would balance it out a bit if the LCA staffing becomes sufficient
I don’t mind getting paid to sit around and do nothing, but I’m not sure it’s doing much to help. I feel maybe putting a couple FOs on IOE every other week would balance it out a bit if the LCA staffing becomes sufficient
There is always the stigma of having that “resigned while in training” on your record, but all HR Reps know and understand the delays are real and you are trying to progress your career as quickly as possible.
#39
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 63
As soon as they see their new hires resigning in training while starting class at another carrier that can push them thru, non-stop, then they will address it. Problem is there are very few carriers than can push the new hires right thru. Endeavor, Republic, and maybe Envoy.
There is always the stigma of having that “resigned while in training” on your record, but all HR Reps know and understand the delays are real and you are trying to progress your career as quickly as possible.
There is always the stigma of having that “resigned while in training” on your record, but all HR Reps know and understand the delays are real and you are trying to progress your career as quickly as possible.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post