Profit Sharing shortfall

Subscribe
1  2 
Page 1 of 2
Go to
I read today in Howie's missive how UAL accelerated interest payments last year, by pre-paying 1.8 billion in 2014. As I recall that is more than what we reported in net profits- sooo, according to my napking accounting, we would have received far more than double the profit sharing payout if they had not accelerated those interest payments.

In fact far more than double, if as I recall the profit sharing formula increases our payout once we pass a certain amount in annual profits.

Anyone care to check my figures?
Reply
Paying down debt and "returning equity to shareholders", takes a bite don't it!?

Reply
Quote: I read today in Howie's missive how UAL accelerated interest payments last year, by pre-paying 1.8 billion in 2014. As I recall that is more than what we reported in net profits- sooo, according to my napking accounting, we would have received far more than double the profit sharing payout if they had not accelerated those interest payments.

In fact far more than double, if as I recall the profit sharing formula increases our payout once we pass a certain amount in annual profits.

Anyone care to check my figures?
I'm not capable of such high mathematics but I just want to chime in with an "atta boy"
Reply
Quote: I read today in Howie's missive how UAL accelerated interest payments last year, by pre-paying 1.8 billion in 2014. As I recall that is more than what we reported in net profits- sooo, according to my napking accounting, we would have received far more than double the profit sharing payout if they had not accelerated those interest payments.

In fact far more than double, if as I recall the profit sharing formula increases our payout once we pass a certain amount in annual profits.

Anyone care to check my figures?
So if 10% of your profits go to profit sharing, and you only have an 8% penalty to pay down debt early, its a better move to pay down that debt and lose the 8% to the creditors than to pay the 10% to employees.

I don't know the exact numbers, but profit sharing is an expense to the company, not a benefit to them.
Reply
Quote: So if 10% of your profits go to profit sharing, and you only have an 8% penalty to pay down debt early, its a better move to pay down that debt and lose the 8% to the creditors than to pay the 10% to employees.

I don't know the exact numbers, but profit sharing is an expense to the company, not a benefit to them.
y

I'm not getting what you are saying about 8% penalty. Howard claimed it saved the company money.

In any case, I guess they could have pre paid or book an additional 1 billion of interest in 2014 and had to pay NO profit sharing.
Reply
I'd be interested in the Union's take on this.
Reply
Quote: y

I'm not getting what you are saying about 8% penalty. Howard claimed it saved the company money.

In any case, I guess they could have pre paid or book an additional 1 billion of interest in 2014 and had to pay NO profit sharing.
Debt is secured and guaranteed a ROI for the purchaser. If you buy it back early, they stop earning interest, so there is a repayment penalty.
Reply
Quote: I read today in Howie's missive how UAL accelerated interest payments last year, by pre-paying 1.8 billion in 2014. As I recall that is more than what we reported in net profits- sooo, according to my napking accounting, we would have received far more than double the profit sharing payout if they had not accelerated those interest payments.

In fact far more than double, if as I recall the profit sharing formula increases our payout once we pass a certain amount in annual profits.

Anyone care to check my figures?

Prepayment, or payment of debt, does not affect the amount of our profit sharing.

Our profit sharing is based off of pre tax income, exclusive of any special charges (this year it was early outs for flight attendants, hedging losses etc)
Reply
Quote: Prepayment, or payment of debt, does not affect the amount of our profit sharing.

Our profit sharing is based off of pre tax income, exclusive of any special charges (this year it was early outs for flight attendants, hedging losses etc)
Not certain, but I don't think that is correct, unless profit sharing is not calculated on EBITA.
Reply
Quote: Not certain, but I don't think that is correct, unless profit sharing is not calculated on EBITA.
Quote:
3-H-3 For profit-sharing based on the years 2014 and beyond, the Company profit sharing plan shall be funded with ten percent (10%) of pre-tax profit up to a pre-tax margin of six and nine-tenths percent (6.9%) plus twenty percent (20%) of pre-tax profit in excess of a pre-tax margin of six and nine-tenths percent (6.9%).

3-H-4 Special and unusual items shall be excluded from pre-tax profit when making the calculations in Sections 3-H-2 and 3-H-3.
We earned $1.97 billion for 2014. If they used payment of debt to offset income as you suggest, then our "profit" should have been ~$3.8 billion. No where in our numbers over the year has that been possible. Sorry, it doesn't pass the common sense test.

And for comparison sake, Delta has been paying down debt even more then us. So then add $1.5 + billion to Deltas 2014 profit, as you want to do with UAL's. Are you saying Delta is hiding profit too? The net result is the same, we trail Delta by a large margin when it comes to profitability.

http://ir.delta.com/files/4Q/Earning...001_f67r8q.pdf

Quote:
Delta ended the quarter with adjusted net debt of $7.3 billion, including cash that is being held by counterparties as hedge margin. The company has achieved nearly $10 billion in net debt reduction since 2009, resulting in a roughly 50% reduction in annual interest expense.
The simple fact is Delta made more profit then us, triggering their 20% clause, which resulted in a much larger profit sharing check.
Reply
1  2 
Page 1 of 2
Go to