Search
Notices

DAL Class drops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2018, 05:51 PM
  #2431  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,201
Default

Originally Posted by Emb170man View Post
Lower paying on year 2 and very limited base selection has to be it....otherwise it’s probably a great plane for a newbie, great technology, a growing fleet means Quick seniority, and relatively younger captains compares to the ER and the 73N ( I fly with some great guys on the ER but I’m the age of most of their children...not much in common to chat about).
Younger CAs? The top guy is around 2800 seniority in the company. :/
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 12-10-2018, 05:53 PM
  #2432  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 439
Default

How is airframe and base picked? What number of social?
Ijustlikeflying is offline  
Old 12-10-2018, 05:54 PM
  #2433  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Default

Originally Posted by Ijustlikeflying View Post
How is airframe and base picked? What number of social?
High to low
Peoloto is offline  
Old 12-10-2018, 07:02 PM
  #2434  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by Xjtpilot518 View Post
Looks like the c10 was one of the most unwanted. Is that because of the bases that plane operates out of?
Yes, and because of the lack of variety for a while. There are pilots out there who like flying the same routes and doing the same layovers all the time but I think most of us appreciate a good mix. I haven't seen a c10 bid packet yet but I'm assuming the trips will be pretty boring until they announce more routes.
RJ4LIFE is offline  
Old 12-10-2018, 07:32 PM
  #2435  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B-73N FO
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
Younger CAs? The top guy is around 2800 seniority in the company. :/


In general yes. I just flew with a guy who is in the 160’s seniority....
Emb170man is offline  
Old 12-10-2018, 07:33 PM
  #2436  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B-73N FO
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto View Post
High to low


Last 4 digits high to low
Emb170man is offline  
Old 12-11-2018, 04:55 AM
  #2437  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by Emb170man View Post
Lower paying on year 2 and very limited base selection has to be it.
Pays more than the 717 but, unlike the B717....and it's a big "but" (and I cannot lie...), no ATL base for the foreseeable future. They would have to wait a year to bid into the ATL domicile....not to mention Minny, DTW, LAX or SEA. Of course, at the pace the recent AEs have been posted, they will have to wait almost that long anyway.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 12-11-2018, 05:10 AM
  #2438  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B-73N FO
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Pays more than the 717 but, unlike the B717....and it's a big "but" (and I cannot lie...), no ATL base for the foreseeable future. They would have to wait a year to bid into the ATL domicile....not to mention Minny, DTW, LAX or SEA. Of course, at the pace the recent AEs have been posted, they will have to wait almost that long anyway.


Yeah, really missing the frequent smaller AE’s!
Emb170man is offline  
Old 12-11-2018, 05:56 AM
  #2439  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Position: Separating Military
Posts: 2
Default

Just got a CJO, but they didn’t give us any information as to the wait time for training.

Do they pass updates to people waiting in the pool? Any idea what the typical wait time is going forward? I’m starting a reserve gig and moving, but not really sure what timeline I should be using to avoid interfering with Delta training. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. -Turd

Last edited by Turd Furgeson; 12-11-2018 at 06:10 AM.
Turd Furgeson is offline  
Old 12-11-2018, 06:17 AM
  #2440  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 252
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Cheesh, you guys almost sound as though you believe that there is some logic and advanced planning here. Almost as if Crew resources (CR) were proactive vice reactive.



Wrong - CR has what would normally be a very, very hard to do job, but is now basically an impossible job due to the schizophrenic nature of marketing. IOW all these last minute route/ship/model changes are impossible to keep up with in the best of times. Add to that numerous fleets, huge retirements etc and you can see why what someone in management says today totally earnestly may be 100% incorrect tomorrow.


OBTW - For years I was very critical of this but as long as we are the most profitable passenger airline in the world I must assume that there is some method to the seeming madness.



Plan for the worst and hope for the best.


Scoop
I too have been amazed the way marketing calls the shots and everyone else scrambles to make it work. The Dec 5th CR memo suggests they are trying to do a better job of looking at the training and stafing implications of marketing's decisions. Apparently there's money to be saved by planning ahead and coordinating efforts.

I especially liked the bit about building rotations with enough cushion to absorb minor disruptions. This comes how many months after the memo telling us the rotations were becoming more efficient to save money?
SideSticker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aussiedoodle
United
9
09-10-2021 12:54 PM
MCFlyer
American
6024
02-11-2020 08:21 AM
Pilotfo64
Delta
21
07-08-2015 02:46 PM
Bobofighter
Major
42
11-10-2007 08:46 PM
WaterSkr
Cargo
7
09-24-2007 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices