Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest >

The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest

Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2017, 10:36 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler View Post
You do realize you can create your own union and not go ALPA correct? A pilot funded association and you call yourselves whatever you want. The point of the discussion is find out why pilots are okay with management funded representation.
This was SERIOUSLY considered a number of years ago (before the 2007 drive). Turns out the finances don't work due to startup costs, ie you would need a very large contribution from all pilots on day to provide enough funds to get going. Practically speaking, that would kill the idea since too many folks would balk at writing a big check, and vote accordingly.

Once established, it would also be hard to afford certain benefits which an alpa member would take for granted.

AA is big enough (and wealthy enough) to go it alone, SKW not so much.

Too bad there's not a national union for regionals only. I actually think that would be a good thing, force alpa majors to come to the table. Then perhaps regionals could either compensated better, or granted universal flow.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 10:54 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default

^yes, possibly a union that represents regionals only. Look at Mesa, Republic, GoJet, etc, all represented by ALPA. It's a conflict of interest in the truest sense, with the cons outweighing the pros (for regionals).

To the OP, what is your motive to push a union drive for a company you don't work for?
TheFly is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:07 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

I like the idea. But remember when Eagle. Was 5 airlines... and the "devided" crew lounge. One side Wings West , 2 year Captains, the other Simmons 10 year FO's!!! How could you represent all airlines interests.. would be tuff..
amcnd is online now  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:11 AM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by TheFly View Post
To the OP, what is your motive to push a union drive for a company you don't work for?
If you work for XJT...

If SKW voted in ALPA, that would open up the *possibility* of a common-carrier petition, which might *possibly* succeed. Since XJT is...

a) More senior longevity-wise and
b) Possibly headed to the same place comair went

It's possible that some of their folks could have an ulterior motive, especially if you're a lifer with no other six-figure skill sets.

I voted yes last time, but if there were a next time I'd probably need to see some sort of independent analysis of the likely-hood of common-carrier and the ramifications before I decided.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:18 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
If you work for XJT...

If SKW voted in ALPA, that would open up the *possibility* of a common-carrier petition, which might *possibly* succeed. Since XJT is...

a) More senior longevity-wise and
b) Possibly headed to the same place comair went

It's possible that some of their folks could have an ulterior motive, especially if you're a lifer with no other six-figure skill sets.

I voted yes last time, but if there were a next time I'd probably need to see some sort of independent analysis of the likely-hood of common-carrier and the ramifications before I decided.
I feel the exact same way. Well said.
peepz is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:26 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
Funny how expressjet guys always want Skywest to be union...wonder why....
I think the entire airline industry wants everyone to be union. Even CapeAir of 200 pilots is union. The better question is why not? Which has not yet been answered.

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I don't think it's Expressjet. The rest of the airline jobs in this country are union and many want to know why Skywest pilots detest them.
Exactly. Almost every other airline is unionized with ALPA or Teamsters.

Originally Posted by Squallrider View Post
9/10 someone brings union up on Skywest thread they are at expressjet.
They aren't effective at regional level, look at expressjets, envoy, psa , Mesa threads and see if anyone is saying how great the union is.
At least ALPA is going after Mesa in federal court because of the pay changes and work rule violations to certain pilots without negotiations. https://www.scribd.com/document/348798949/ALPA-vs-Mesa Would SAPA go after Skywest? No, because they legally can't, they don't represent the collective group of Skywest pilots. So it will be up to each of you to retain an attorney and go after them if and when they do wrong by you.

Last edited by DirkDiggler; 06-02-2017 at 11:40 AM.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:32 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
If you work for XJT...

If SKW voted in ALPA, that would open up the *possibility* of a common-carrier petition, which might *possibly* succeed. Since XJT is...

a) More senior longevity-wise and
b) Possibly headed to the same place comair went

It's possible that some of their folks could have an ulterior motive, especially if you're a lifer with no other six-figure skill sets.

I voted yes last time, but if there were a next time I'd probably need to see some sort of independent analysis of the likely-hood of common-carrier and the ramifications before I decided.
They did a survey of XJT pilots like a year ago and 75% of them were looking to get out over the next 2 years. Very very few lifers. Nobody will be left to give a crap. Including myself, I'm already on my way out to a three letter gov agency. And I have a business / six figure skill set / real job in addition. I started this thread out of morbid curiosity. I have not yet seen the answer as to why.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:39 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by TheFly View Post
^yes, possibly a union that represents regionals only. Look at Mesa, Republic, GoJet, etc, all represented by ALPA. It's a conflict of interest in the truest sense, with the cons outweighing the pros (for regionals).

To the OP, what is your motive to push a union drive for a company you don't work for?
Republic and Gojet are Teamsters.
Five93H is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:43 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
b) Certainly headed to the same place comair went
... Fixed it for you, Rick.
AboveMins is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 11:58 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Default

ASA side has more "lifers" then L-XJT..
amcnd is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonnyKnoxville
Regional
47
04-24-2014 11:34 AM
DLax85
Cargo
14
08-24-2009 06:21 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
07-27-2005 08:47 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
0
05-19-2005 09:35 AM
Sir James
Major
0
05-06-2005 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices