Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest >

The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

The Forbidden Discussion - Unions & Skywest

Old 06-02-2017, 12:36 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,022
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
If you work for XJT...

If SKW voted in ALPA, that would open up the *possibility* of a common-carrier petition, which might *possibly* succeed. Since XJT is...

a) More senior longevity-wise and
b) Possibly headed to the same place comair went

It's possible that some of their folks could have an ulterior motive, especially if you're a lifer with no other six-figure skill sets.

I voted yes last time, but if there were a next time I'd probably need to see some sort of independent analysis of the likely-hood of common-carrier and the ramifications before I decided.
I think the ulterior motive would be to have a job. I can only imagine the frustration if your boss growing the business, hiring pilots, while your seniority list shrinks and your airplanes get sent off to other properties. I think the motive would be, as with all unions, job security.
CBreezy is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 01:36 PM
  #22  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,185
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
I think the ulterior motive would be to have a job. I can only imagine the frustration if your boss growing the business, hiring pilots, while your seniority list shrinks and your airplanes get sent off to other properties. I think the motive would be, as with all unions, job security.
Entirely understandable, but I would understandably need to know the ramifications of a seniority integration on my family (I don't really care when or where I fly, but my family cares when and how often I'm home and when we take vacation).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 02:37 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: Reclined seat
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Entirely understandable, but I would understandably need to know the ramifications of a seniority integration on my family (I don't really care when or where I fly, but my family cares when and how often I'm home and when we take vacation).
If it was to happen, it would take years, not to mention that I'm sure plenty of fences will be put up to mitigate the issues. With the movement that's happening in the industry, it would take a minimum of 3-5 years as an estimate to get it all done, and the regionals will be gutted by then.
wmupilot85 is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 09:38 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 733
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
If you work for XJT...

If SKW voted in ALPA, that would open up the *possibility* of a common-carrier petition, which might *possibly* succeed. Since XJT is...

a) More senior longevity-wise and
b) Possibly headed to the same place comair went

It's possible that some of their folks could have an ulterior motive, especially if you're a lifer with no other six-figure skill sets.

I voted yes last time, but if there were a next time I'd probably need to see some sort of independent analysis of the likely-hood of common-carrier and the ramifications before I decided.
What union you're in or not in doesn't matter in a single carrier petition. An SLI/PID (Seniority List Integration/Policy Implementation Date) is filed with the union if both carriers are represented (ASA and CMR tried this in 2000 after DAL bought them) and forces a seniority integration. A single carrier petition is filed with the NMB (National Mediation Board), not the union. If one were filed and approved, it would force a referendum to decide representation, and my understanding is that ALPA isn't as popular over there as you think it is. The outcome of that would be a negotiated equitable seniority merger under Bond-McCaskill. The ASA/XJT side could theoretically file one any time they wish.

Last edited by ecam; 06-03-2017 at 09:49 AM. Reason: Kicked the hornet nest harder than I intended to.
ecam is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 04:40 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HermannGraf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CR7
Posts: 267
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler View Post
They did a survey of XJT pilots like a year ago and 75% of them were looking to get out over the next 2 years. Very very few lifers. Nobody will be left to give a crap. Including myself, I'm already on my way out to a three letter gov agency. And I have a business / six figure skill set / real job in addition. I started this thread out of morbid curiosity. I have not yet seen the answer as to why.
Why, because our company has devoted a lot to prevent that and they have manage to brainwash a lot of pilots or gain from many anti-union personalities joining the ranks.
Does the company protects you the pilots from Unions and because of that is doing you a favor? do you really think they care about YOU? Nah....I don't think that is why they devote a whole section on their site on why not to accept a union. At the same time they pay Sapa and fool the pilots to believe they have some form of representation.

Why is it that we have to accept that Expressjet has a better 401K match compensation than what we have at Skywest? Did they not buy Expressjet with the money we helped the company to make?
Why would we accept Inc. compensating Expressjet pilots in any way better than us?
HermannGraf is offline  
Old 06-04-2017, 08:06 AM
  #26  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by HermannGraf View Post
Why, because our company has devoted a lot to prevent that and they have manage to brainwash a lot of pilots or gain from many anti-union personalities joining the ranks.
Does the company protects you the pilots from Unions and because of that is doing you a favor? do you really think they care about YOU? Nah....I don't think that is why they devote a whole section on their site on why not to accept a union. At the same time they pay Sapa and fool the pilots to believe they have some form of representation.

Why is it that we have to accept that Expressjet has a better 401K match compensation than what we have at Skywest? Did they not buy Expressjet with the money we helped the company to make?
Why would we accept Inc. compensating Expressjet pilots in any way better than us?
Oh, 100%. SAPA is nothing more than a charade meant to deceive the pilot group. They neither represent us nor care about our wellbeing so long as it does not affect the ability of the company to make money. SAPA is a mouthpiece for management's wishes, and they will do whatever supports the bottom line of the company and stakeholders. The few profit off the many (us). SAPA is competent at fooling outsiders and those within that have no idea who truly foots the bill for their undertakings.
Duesenflieger is offline  
Old 06-07-2017, 06:00 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
untied's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Default

Joining ALPA is CHEAP.

AND…you instantly get access to their VAST resources and expertise.

Funny how a lot of Skywest pilots look forward to the payoff at the "next level", but are unwilling to join their brothers in the fight for better working conditions and pay.

They want it all for free.

You guys need to get ALPA onboard, or ALPA carriers should look elsewhere when it comes time to hire.

There are a lot of good folks at Skywest that want to do the right thing. I hope you can find a majority soon to get this to happen.
untied is offline  
Old 06-07-2017, 10:37 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
untied's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 521
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post
You know what would be funny?

The next time I interview a SkyWest pilot, I don't give him the job.
untied is offline  
Old 06-07-2017, 02:43 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

In 2010 the Nation Mediation Board changed the rules to show that to win representation you must get a majority of all votes cast and a missing vote is no longer counted as a "no" vote. It is a lot easier to win a representation election now then it was prior to 2010. But you still need signed authorization cards from 50% of the class to submit the petition to the NMB to get an official vote going.

http://www.nmb.gov/documents/press-c...ion-manual.pdf
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 06-07-2017, 02:52 PM
  #30  
Ich bin Pilot von Beruf
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: CRJ Kapitän
Posts: 616
Default

Originally Posted by untied View Post
Joining ALPA is CHEAP.

AND…you instantly get access to their VAST resources and expertise.

Funny how a lot of Skywest pilots look forward to the payoff at the "next level", but are unwilling to join their brothers in the fight for better working conditions and pay.

They want it all for free.

You guys need to get ALPA onboard, or ALPA carriers should look elsewhere when it comes time to hire.

There are a lot of good folks at Skywest that want to do the right thing. I hope you can find a majority soon to get this to happen.
I for one would like to see it, but the chances of it ever coming to pass are slim at OO.
Duesenflieger is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonnyKnoxville
Regional
47
04-24-2014 11:34 AM
DLax85
Cargo
14
08-24-2009 06:21 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
0
07-27-2005 08:47 AM
Freighter Captain
Major
0
05-19-2005 09:35 AM
Sir James
Major
0
05-06-2005 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices