No, that was basically the company’s stint to bring the price of their 175 orders down.
E6BAV8R
03-02-2019 11:40 AM
Originally Posted by N1CEandEZ
(Post 2771428)
No, that was basically the company’s stint to bring the price of their 175 orders down.
And/or a wise financial decision. Inc. probably knew there was no way Mitsubishi would be able to deliver the aircraft on time, and then they can take them to court for all kinds of financial penalties for not delivering on the contract and then null and void the contract altogether. Essentially a way to get some financial settlements with minimal risk.
captive apple
03-02-2019 03:10 PM
Inc has a leasing company.
Airlines would never need to fly them to make money.
Melit
03-03-2019 07:47 AM
Originally Posted by FollowMe
(Post 2769812)
Would be net neutral at best, without scope relief adding 175SC would require removing 700s 1 for 1. GoJets are already going away ala 550, so to add SC either the Mesa or OO 700s would have to come off.
