Slyweezy starting a Part 135
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 880
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,090
#97
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 46
The point is that, although this only applies to a small number of planes, it is still a significant relaxation of scope.
It is not even mentioned in the bullet points description of the TA. In fact the first bullet point insults the reading comprehension skills of the pilot group by claiming
”No changes to the number of permitted 76, 70, or 50 seat regional aircraft”.
Technically true? Typical BS? Yes and yes.
I wonder how many UA pilots sat down, committed the time to read and understand the TA, then came to the scope relaxation part and said “well thats it for me, another hour wasted by the bs department”
It is not even mentioned in the bullet points description of the TA. In fact the first bullet point insults the reading comprehension skills of the pilot group by claiming
”No changes to the number of permitted 76, 70, or 50 seat regional aircraft”.
Technically true? Typical BS? Yes and yes.
I wonder how many UA pilots sat down, committed the time to read and understand the TA, then came to the scope relaxation part and said “well thats it for me, another hour wasted by the bs department”
#99
DL is more like 500 nm. The longest 200 flight in their system (at least east of the Mississippi) is ATL-SBN. I think that's less of a scope restriction and more of a "passengers hate the 200" thing.
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,066
The point is that, although this only applies to a small number of planes, it is still a significant relaxation of scope.
It is not even mentioned in the bullet points description of the TA. In fact the first bullet point insults the reading comprehension skills of the pilot group by claiming
”No changes to the number of permitted 76, 70, or 50 seat regional aircraft”.
Technically true? Typical BS? Yes and yes.
I wonder how many UA pilots sat down, committed the time to read and understand the TA, then came to the scope relaxation part and said “well thats it for me, another hour wasted by the bs department”
It is not even mentioned in the bullet points description of the TA. In fact the first bullet point insults the reading comprehension skills of the pilot group by claiming
”No changes to the number of permitted 76, 70, or 50 seat regional aircraft”.
Technically true? Typical BS? Yes and yes.
I wonder how many UA pilots sat down, committed the time to read and understand the TA, then came to the scope relaxation part and said “well thats it for me, another hour wasted by the bs department”
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post