Skywest
#4941
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: CA
Posts: 55
I use the new David Clark DC ProX in the CRJ. The ANR works great, super lightweight and comfortable.
$637
$637
#4942
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 71
In all the years you've flown you haven't had anything other than that? Either way, don't go getting or using some big clunky headsets you'll be wearing all day. I mean, if they are comfortable to you, then by all means use them. If you're going to the CRJ then telex are great, as well as bose. I prefer the telex to the bose however. Bose are just, well, big.
#4943
In all the years you've flown you haven't had anything other than that? Either way, don't go getting or using some big clunky headsets you'll be wearing all day. I mean, if they are comfortable to you, then by all means use them. If you're going to the CRJ then telex are great, as well as bose. I prefer the telex to the bose however. Bose are just, well, big.
#4944
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
[QUOTE=John 3:16;1640417]Brother, we don't wear anything but helmets in fighters. I do have a cheapo pair of headsets, probably 30 years old, that I used in the very distant past when flying light aircraft. USAF heavy drivers might have headsets (I don't know if they're issued headsets or not), but we fighter folks just wear the helmet. Hard to attach NVGs and JHMCS to a headset![/QUOTE
That made me laugh out loud. Literally.
That made me laugh out loud. Literally.
#4947
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 71
Brother, we don't wear anything but helmets in fighters. I do have a cheapo pair of headsets, probably 30 years old, that I used in the very distant past when flying light aircraft. USAF heavy drivers might have headsets (I don't know if they're issued headsets or not), but we fighter folks just wear the helmet. Hard to attach NVGs and JHMCS to a headset!
#4950
On Reserve
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 18
SkyWest, Inc.
1Q 2014 Revenue: $772,385,518.00 Net Income: -$22,887,193.00 Net Margin: -2.96%
SkyWest Airlines
1Q 2014 Revenue: $447,041,197.00 Net Income: -- Net Margin: .99%
Quick math tells me that .99% of $447,041,197.00 is a profit of $4,425,707.85
Further math tells me that -$22,887,197.00 - $4,425,707.85 means ExpressJet lost $27,312,905.
Good enough?
1Q 2014 Revenue: $772,385,518.00 Net Income: -$22,887,193.00 Net Margin: -2.96%
SkyWest Airlines
1Q 2014 Revenue: $447,041,197.00 Net Income: -- Net Margin: .99%
Quick math tells me that .99% of $447,041,197.00 is a profit of $4,425,707.85
Further math tells me that -$22,887,197.00 - $4,425,707.85 means ExpressJet lost $27,312,905.
Good enough?
On a related note, I was surprised that both SKYW and RJET were trading below their respective book values. Typically, a company stock trades much higher than the company book value. For instance WMT is trading at 3.34 times it's book value.
Here is a list of some majors and their price:book value ratios:
AAL 22.7
DAL 2.73
UAL 5.85
LUV 2.35
By contrast, here are the figures for SkyWest and Republic
SKYW 0.43
RJET 0.84
In other words, theoretically, SKYW could be liquidated for more than the cost of all it's shares for a tidy profit. That's the type of news that makes folks like Gordon Gekko drool.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post