Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > SkyWest
Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit >

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2016, 01:34 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 25
Default Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit

Skywest Flight Attendant Lawsuit | Unpaid Wages | ClassAction.org

The brief itself is at http://www.classaction.org/media/pdf...-v-skywest.pdf

So supposedly this suit is right now awaiting the Judge ruling on Skywest's request for dismissal - I don't know when that will happen, or which way the ruling will go. If it's not dismissed, then it will proceed to a full suit.

I've gotta say, the same things apply to us pilots - we get paid for block time, but we have duties before/after flights that are required per the FAR's and we do NOT get paid for those.

Thoughts?
rabsing76 is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 01:39 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Are the flight attendants at skywest unionized?

Also, this isn't exactly new news, if I recall this is about a year old now. Has something significant changed since? Is the judges ruling on dismissal immanent?
FirstClass is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 02:43 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 03:02 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
What does that even mean? Can you explain your point of view a little better?
FirstClass is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

While I understand that labor groups can negotiate their rights to overtime and other labor laws, I've never understood how SkyWest can get away with it, given that no legal CBA exists with any of its labor groups. As hourly workers, we should be paid for all duty time, including overtime.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 03:06 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

They churn through FA's.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 03:25 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Lots
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
Most attendants haven't done their ho(m)ework and then they turn aound and want to get paid. Please
JB22 is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 08:31 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
Even if they win it isn't going to turn out how they are dreaming about.
I wouldn't say retention is on the list of priorities for skyw FA's
If you took two seconds to read the first sentence you would know they were former FAs and a win would be good for the, since it would likely be in the form of back pay.
adspilot is offline  
Old 04-05-2016, 09:17 PM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing View Post
While I understand that labor groups can negotiate their rights to overtime and other labor laws, I've never understood how SkyWest can get away with it, given that no legal CBA exists with any of its labor groups. As hourly workers, we should be paid for all duty time, including overtime.
Collective bargaining per se does not require a union. A "legal CBA" is one that holds up in court, has nothing to with a union.

But lack of a union makes it easier for a subset of the labor group to challenge the validity of the "arrangement". Easier, but no slam dunk. They have to claim that their interests were not adequately represented, ie that the "representative group" which "negotiated" the contract is controlled by the company.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 04:49 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Downwind, headed straight for the rocks, shanghaied aboard the ship of fools.
Posts: 1,128
Default

Pathetic. Suing an employer for paying you according to the work rules you agreed to work under when you took the job? Simply and utterly pathetic.
SpeedyVagabond is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetnfast
Military
52
02-28-2014 09:14 AM
Past V1
Major
10
01-04-2013 03:31 PM
jban642
Hangar Talk
3
09-11-2009 01:42 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices