Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2245385)
Stick with that! Adding ferry tanks to a DC9 for 1 crossing was over 300,000 including return shipping. That buys a lot of jet fuel.
|
Originally Posted by Ordell
(Post 2245172)
The plane has not been tested in icy conditions AFAIK, and Russia and Alaska are undoubtedly pretty gnarly by now. So they may have had to go the southern route.
The other two planes in Japan are not coming to the US until next year. One has not flown at all and the other was damaged during tests. Its 3100 nm further to go the southern route, + ferry tanks. Great Circle Mapper |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2245385)
Stick with that! Adding ferry tanks to a DC9 for 1 crossing was over 300,000 including return shipping. That buys a lot of jet fuel.
|
Originally Posted by KSCessnaDriver
(Post 2245646)
What would you need ferry tanks for when you can just get auxiliary tanks in a DC9 to take you up to nearly 39,000 lbs of gas
|
|
To answer the original question, I'm beginning to doubt it. What could possibly cause a 2 year delay?
TOKYO -- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has confirmed that the delivery of its Mitsubishi Regional Jet will be postponed yet again, this time to mid-2020. The delivery deadline was scheduled for mid-2018 for an order from ANA Holdings. The heavy machinery maker plans to announce the delay, its fifth, on Monday. The MRJ, Japan's first homegrown commercial jetliner, has been under development by group member Mitsubishi Aircraft. A design modification that requires changing the location of some electronic equipment on the aircraft has forced the manufacturer to re-examine the delivery schedule. In the fall of 2016, the Mitsubishi group informed parties involved that delivery would be postponed. Speculation put the new deadline for 2019 at the earliest. The Mitsubishi group has spent billions of dollars on developing the commercial airliner, but the ever-growing time frame is becoming a financial burden. To further push the project, the group plans to set up a committee that will exclusively promote the project and report directly to Mitsubishi Heavy President Shunichi Miyanaga. (Nikkei) |
Originally Posted by Apokleros
(Post 2193099)
So you essentially opened this thread just to fap off to an airplane that has been fapped off by many other threads in APC? Niceeee
|
Fapping aside it makes you wonder though. There's like 200 orders of this thing in the US, will Mitsubishi and the airlines allow it to just go away?
|
Originally Posted by minimwage4
(Post 2363634)
Fapping aside it makes you wonder though. There's like 200 orders of this thing in the US, will Mitsubishi and the airlines allow it to just go away?
|
I hope we get some of those Sukhoi RJs. I bet Trump can get us a smokin' deal...
|
Originally Posted by minimwage4
(Post 2363634)
Fapping aside it makes you wonder though. There's like 200 orders of this thing in the US, will Mitsubishi and the airlines allow it to just go away?
The US orders are not firm. So really they don't exist. Non-firm orders benefit the buyer because if they need a bunch of airplanes fast, they're at the head of the line. So if all the ERJs or CRJ's get grounded there's a plan C. If they get epic growth opportunity they have another source of airframes. If scope gets relaxed, they're ready to move in fast. Non-firm orders benefit the seller because it puts some numbers up on the board, and it's better than no orders. Also selling to US airlines is the gold standard of acceptance for an airframer who wants to sell airplanes globally. |
The MRJ had a decent chance back 10 years ago. They are way to late now.. if you want to see one fly. You will have to go to Asia. Or Moses Lake, WA....
|
Originally Posted by amcnd
(Post 2364913)
The MRJ had a decent chance back 10 years ago. They are way to late now.. if you want to see one fly. You will have to go to Asia. Or Moses Lake, WA....
How will regionals staff it you might ask. Less planes... solves a few issues, now regionals don't have to find as many pilots. Just means there won't be as much frequency; one C Series lite or MRJ instead of two CRJ 200s. Do I think they'll (UA pilots) bite and outsource flying? Probably not but the question is will the carrot management dangles be big enough. |
Originally Posted by Groundpointfife
(Post 2370179)
Well Scott Kirby at United is now suggesting that the pilots should open scope to 88 seats. It's a 12 seat jump.
How will regionals staff it you might ask. Less planes... solves a few issues, now regionals don't have to find as many pilots. Just means there won't be as much frequency; one C Series lite or MRJ instead of two CRJ 200s. Do I think they'll (UA pilots) bite and outsource flying? Probably not but the question is will the carrot management dangles be big enough. |
Originally Posted by Groundpointfife
(Post 2370179)
Well Scott Kirby at United is now suggesting that the pilots should open scope to 88 seats. It's a 12 seat jump.
How will regionals staff it you might ask. Less planes... solves a few issues, now regionals don't have to find as many pilots. Just means there won't be as much frequency; one C Series lite or MRJ instead of two CRJ 200s. Do I think they'll (UA pilots) bite and outsource flying? Probably not but the question is will the carrot management dangles be big enough. |
He'll get his wish eventually.
I feel like some of these new guys are doomed to repeat the same mistakes of a certain older generation. |
|
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2370204)
What UA really needs is a 90-110 seater. Something in the same league as the 717 or C series. Having that flown by regionals would be Kirby's wet dream.
|
Originally Posted by Cefiro
(Post 2370638)
Agreed, hopefully UA pilots reject an increase in scope. Having planes that size flown by mainline pilots is better for all of us.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2370640)
Keep in mind that if Skywest is allowed to fly the aircraft for UAL they would have to cease all flying for Delta. That would incur huge financial penalties since they have agreed to abide by the Delta scope as a term of their contract. For Skywest to fly those airframes it will require a change of both Delta and UAL scope. The probability of a Delta change in scope is less than nil!
If it is at the airline level you can always come up with a subsidiary .., |
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2370659)
Is that at the inc level or airline level?
If it is at the airline level you can always come up with a subsidiary .., |
Originally Posted by WesternSkies
(Post 2370286)
He'll get his wish eventually.
I feel like some of these new guys are doomed to repeat the same mistakes of a certain older generation. |
Originally Posted by Half wing
(Post 2370699)
New guys not the threat. Don't want to get furloughed. Senior guys that will get a big raise and won't have to worry about a furlough are the threat. That is the biggest demographic of pilot right now also with about 10 years left. Not to worry. Most older dudes are not the type that want to pull up the ladder. No scope relaxation will take place unless that carrot is really freaking sweat. A carrot big enough would cost the company way more than giving mainline the cs100/300.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2371045)
I hope you are right but if indeed the united pilot group throws yet another generation of pilots under the proverbial bus for a few pieces of silver I suspect that every time a united pilot comes sniffing around for a jumpseat on a "regional" jet they are going to find that it is on MEL.
|
Originally Posted by JetDoc
(Post 2371045)
I hope you are right but if indeed the united pilot group throws yet another generation of pilots under the proverbial bus for a few pieces of silver I suspect that every time a united pilot comes sniffing around for a jumpseat on a "regional" jet they are going to find that it is on MEL.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands