SWA Maintenance TA voted down
AMFA | Southwest Airlines News & Updates
Things are about to get interesting around here....OVER 6 years and our mechanics STILL don't have a contract. Unbelievable -- all the while SWA has done approx. 7 BILLION $ worth of pointless, counter-productive stock buybacks during that time frame. Not feeling the LUV -- I'll be out in uniform picketing alongside my maintainers when the time comes. Hope to see many of my fellow pilots at their pickets whenever they announce them. |
Good for them. They deserve better.
|
Originally Posted by Thunder1
(Post 2677474)
AMFA | Southwest Airlines News & Updates
Things are about to get interesting around here....OVER 6 years and our mechanics STILL don't have a contract. Unbelievable -- all the while SWA has done approx. 7 BILLION $ worth of pointless, counter-productive stock buybacks during that time frame. Not feeling the LUV -- I'll be out in uniform picketing alongside my maintainers when the time comes. Hope to see many of my fellow pilots at their pickets whenever they announce them. |
Originally Posted by Smooth at FL450
(Post 2677548)
Good for them. They deserve better.
|
Originally Posted by terminal
(Post 2677594)
What does this mean for Hawaii planning? Wasn’t the ETOPS a big element in this?
I heard nearly the exact same wording from 3 separate executives. |
Originally Posted by flensr
(Post 2678319)
Word from the company mgt is that ETOPS (and LAX base) are completely decoupled from the MX contract. The official stance appears to be that SWA can proceed with ETOPS and LAX under the current contract, end of discussion.
I heard nearly the exact same wording from 3 separate executives. |
Originally Posted by Thunder1
(Post 2678323)
Yep, and I heard the same type of story from SWA management that SWAPA pilots had to fly the 737 MAX even though that airplane was not listed in our CBA. They chose not to press to test the issue and signed TA2 with us before the first MAX arrived on property. Just because SWA management says it is one way doesn't mean that is factually correct not to mention morally or ethically correct.
|
Originally Posted by I like BIG Bus
(Post 2677616)
Yes. Well done. It’s great to see unity and vision thwart an otherwise underwhelming deal. I hope our pilot group has the sack to do it facing a bad offer. Hope it gets better from here for them.
|
Originally Posted by Thunder1
(Post 2678323)
Yep, and I heard the same type of story from SWA management that SWAPA pilots had to fly the 737 MAX even though that airplane was not listed in our CBA. They chose not to press to test the issue and signed TA2 with us before the first MAX arrived on property. Just because SWA management says it is one way doesn't mean that is factually correct not to mention morally or ethically correct.
80%+ of us agreed to, literally, PAY for the privilege of flying the -800 with SL6. |
I think part of the issue is the ETOPS service checks in the islands. AMFA want company mechanics to do them, of course and the company wants to farm them out.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands