Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
Southwest profits spike... >

Southwest profits spike...

Notices

Southwest profits spike...

Old 10-24-2019, 03:51 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Captain
Posts: 278
Default Southwest profits spike...

Only SWA, who flies only 737's and has numerous Max deliveries stalled, could still make money

https://wtop.com/business-finance/20...ax-groundings/

DALLAS (AP) — Southwest Airlines is muscling through the grounding of its Boeing 737 Max aircraft fleet, reporting a 7% jump in profits and record operating revenue.

Southwest had more Max jets than any airline when the plane was grounded in March after crashes involving other carriers in Indonesia and Ethiopia killed 346 people.

Strong travel demand and rising ticket prices helped offset its Boeing issues.

On Thursday, Southwest Airlines Co. reported third-quarter profit of $659 million, or $1.23 per share. That easily topped Wall Street expectations for $1.09, according to a survey by Zacks Investment Research.

Revenue of $5.64 billion was in line with expectations.
BarrySeal is offline  
Old 10-24-2019, 02:57 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 84
Default

Heck ya! Looks like the same profit sharing is expected as last year, but with more employees.
ackeight is offline  
Old 10-25-2019, 03:24 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by BarrySeal View Post
Only SWA, who flies only 737's and has numerous Max deliveries stalled, could still make money

https://wtop.com/business-finance/20...ax-groundings/
There's no doubt that the industry "benefited" via higher fares due to limited capacity during the unplanned MAX parking.

SWA will have to show Boeing/court that it could have made MORE money had the MAX been flying the whole summer...... that may be more of a challenge.
full of luv is offline  
Old 10-31-2019, 04:31 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,565
Default

Originally Posted by ackeight View Post
Heck ya! Looks like the same profit sharing is expected as last year, but with more employees.
While the profit-sharing percentage may very well be what it was last year, there will be a number of pilots who will make less simply because they flew less due to their lines being reduced from say 98 to 87 TFP, fewer if any JA's and fewer reroutes, especially if they're on the top end of the pay scale.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 10-31-2019, 04:33 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,565
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv View Post
SWA will have to show Boeing/court that it could have made MORE money had the MAX been flying the whole summer...... that may be more of a challenge.
I'm not a bean counter, but... how do you quantify the loss of market share and ceding markets due to no aircraft through no fault of your own? That's been all over the news.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 11-01-2019, 05:22 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
I'm not a bean counter, but... how do you quantify the loss of market share and ceding markets due to no aircraft through no fault of your own? That's been all over the news.
I'm not saying it's not having an effect on their original strategy, but the resulting external constraint on domestic service in the middle of a well-off economy with low oil prices has produced an environment where all the airlines are achieving much higher revenues than even they imagined two years ago.

Bean counters will have to go to court to convince a jury (or at least Boeing) that had they had access to all this capacity they would have made even more money (than historic 3rd Q profits) despite much more capacity being introduced domestically from SWA/UAL/AMR with the MAX.

Ironically, since deregulation, many an airline has driven itself into or towards bankruptcy in the pursuit of the almighty market share.
full of luv is offline  
Old 11-01-2019, 05:31 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,565
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv View Post
I'm not saying it's not having an effect on their original strategy, but the resulting external constraint on domestic service in the middle of a well-off economy with low oil prices has produced an environment where all the airlines are achieving much higher revenues than even they imagined two years ago.



Bean counters will have to go to court to convince a jury (or at least Boeing) that had they had access to all this capacity they would have made even more money (than historic 3rd Q profits) despite much more capacity being introduced domestically from SWA/UAL/AMR with the MAX.


You may not wanna include SWA in this figure... UAL and AMR can switch to other types. SWA cannot as we bet our future existence on the MAX. That’s why the debate goes on whether it’s wise to remain a single type fleet.

SWA also hired more workers in anticipation of this expansion and increasing its market share, and it now has to absorb the cost of doing so, in addition to not having aircraft to do what it had planned through no fault of their own.

I don’t see this going in front of a jury. This will get settled out of court.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 11-01-2019, 08:33 AM
  #8  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,593
Default

Isn’t AMR gone?
at6d is offline  
Old 11-01-2019, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
You may not wanna include SWA in this figure... UAL and AMR can switch to other types. SWA cannot as we bet our future existence on the MAX. That’s why the debate goes on whether it’s wise to remain a single type fleet.

SWA also hired more workers in anticipation of this expansion and increasing its market share, and it now has to absorb the cost of doing so, in addition to not having aircraft to do what it had planned through no fault of their own.

I don’t see this going in front of a jury. This will get settled out of court.
I was including AA and UAL because it did curtail some of their domestic expansion plans over the past year as well. Maybe not to the extent of SWA, but it did trim their Domestic ASMs.

That in turn helped the whole industry turn record 3Q profits as people ponied up and bought remaining seats at a slight premium over what would have been offered.

My whole comment was that SWA will have to prove to someone (probably not a jury but at least BAs counsel) that it would have made MORE profit had the max been an amazing success. That’s going to be a challenge considering how much profit they made despite the MAXs actual disappointment.

Not flooding the market with extra capacity has helped the industry, even SWA make some nice profits.
full of luv is offline  
Old 11-02-2019, 05:02 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv View Post
I was including AA and UAL because it did curtail some of their domestic expansion plans over the past year as well. Maybe not to the extent of SWA, but it did trim their Domestic ASMs.

That in turn helped the whole industry turn record 3Q profits as people ponied up and bought remaining seats at a slight premium over what would have been offered.

My whole comment was that SWA will have to prove to someone (probably not a jury but at least BAs counsel) that it would have made MORE profit had the max been an amazing success. That’s going to be a challenge considering how much profit they made despite the MAXs actual disappointment.

Not flooding the market with extra capacity has helped the industry, even SWA make some nice profits.
SWAPA may make that case more convincingly. Maybe that will set precedent for the company.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shoelu
Major
134
03-26-2014 10:11 AM
Hal9000
Major
37
05-18-2011 01:29 PM
G-Dog
Regional
236
06-27-2009 02:19 PM
Rabid Seagull
Major
1
05-26-2009 03:18 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices