Maybe the no accusations is the hang up. A few competitors are pretty cheap right now
|
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 3014345)
Maybe the no accusations is the hang up. A few competitors are pretty cheap right now
I missed that part in the initial read through. Interesting.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by hoover
(Post 3014345)
Maybe the no accusations is the hang up. A few competitors are pretty cheap right now
|
The internal memo just sent to employees certainly seems to indicate that SWA is moving away from the Gubmint cheese. 🧀 If they go this route, they had better get out in front of this quickly, and settle the troops. If the battle cry going forward is that we are going this alone, and want to be there to capitalize on the other side, I could see the group pulling together. The carnage that is ahead is beyond regrettable. For now, if SWA goes this way, we dance with the one who brought us, and fight to get through this together.
|
Originally Posted by poopooplatter
(Post 3014396)
The internal memo just sent to employees certainly seems to indicate that SWA is moving away from the Gubmint cheese. 🧀 If they go this route, they had better get out in front of this quickly, and settle the troops. If the battle cry going forward is that we are going this alone, and want to be there to capitalize on the other side, I could see the group pulling together. The carnage that is ahead is beyond regrettable. For now, if SWA goes this way, we dance with the one who brought us, and fight to get through this together.
|
Originally Posted by flyguy81
(Post 3014456)
unless I missed something it just said they were going to analyze everything and make sure it was the best thing to do. Didn’t read as they’d made a decision one way or another.
I wonder if they've got institutional investors lobbying for them not to take the money so they can keep getting their "capital deployment" fix. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Referencing one of the above posts: Yes, they did not say for certain, but as opposed to, for example, UAL which announced straight away that they were all-in, SWA seems to be CONSIDERING a different track.
|
Originally Posted by poopooplatter
(Post 3014396)
The internal memo just sent to employees certainly seems to indicate that SWA is moving away from the Gubmint cheese. 🧀 If they go this route, they had better get out in front of this quickly, and settle the troops. If the battle cry going forward is that we are going this alone, and want to be there to capitalize on the other side, I could see the group pulling together. The carnage that is ahead is beyond regrettable. For now, if SWA goes this way, we dance with the one who brought us, and fight to get through this together.
|
Originally Posted by 4V14T0R
(Post 3014460)
I wonder if they've got institutional investors lobbying for them not to take the money so they can keep getting their "capital deployment" fix.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3014491)
Any rumors of Buffett making an offer to take the company private? It would seem to be an opportune time for him to make a move, and SWA is the top of the list as far as airlines go.
None that I've heard. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands