Search
Notices

New SWA 717 TPA Domicile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2011, 09:23 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blakman7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by BCDurbin View Post
unless I hear some firm reasons why they want a TPA 717 base, I'll just say that I don't think it will ever happen. lotta stuff can change in 2 years, in which time all of us 717 pilots will still be on the Airtran side and still be based in ATL! TPA was just something to write on a piece of paper.
+1 for BCDurbin

Who in the hell announces a base 2 years before its due to open? It's like dangling a twinkie in front of Chris Griffin.
blakman7 is offline  
Old 12-15-2011, 02:12 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by MatthewAMEL View Post
I would suggest you read the Transition Bid documents in FLICA and on the ATN ALPA website.

If ATL is the most important consideration for you, then your two choices are 717CA and 717FO.

There are currently no plans for a ATL 737 domicile.
Out of curiosity, as a former 737 pilot for AirTran, what is happening to the 737 guys in Atlanta if there are no plans for a 737 domicile?
aupilot is offline  
Old 12-15-2011, 04:05 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Marvin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B-737 Right
Posts: 243
Default

Originally Posted by aupilot View Post
Out of curiosity, as a former 737 pilot for AirTran, what is happening to the 737 guys in Atlanta if there are no plans for a 737 domicile?
It depends.

If one is a senior 737 CA in ATL, then that individual can choose to bid over to SWA as an FO or stay in ATL as a CA or FO on the 717. IN addition, the more senior 737 CAs can keep their seat in ATL until the last few airplanes go through conversion, so they can potentially keep their seat for a couple years. On the SWA side, they will go wherever their seniority will hold for a base. If they choose 717 CA, they may be able to stay in ATL for a long time.

737 FOs will mostly be 717 FOs, although some will be able to get 737 FO on the SWA side and a few may be able to upgrade to 717 CA on the ATN side.

Some folks are bidding the 717 to try to stay in ATL or to try to retain a CA seat on the SWA side after 2015.

Clear as mud? :-)
Marvin is offline  
Old 02-02-2012, 05:50 AM
  #14  
On Reserve
 
Hugo Stiglitz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Basically, it went down like this:

If you had a seniority number of 784 (out of 1734 total pilots on the AirTran side) or senior you could of held ATL or TPA 717 CA, 510 total positions (TPA or ATL to be determined at a later date).

If you had a seniority number of 1363 or senior you could have held SWA 737FO and a base in the SWA system to be bid on when you are in training, 707 total positions.

If you were junior to number 1363 you had no choice but to hold the B717 FO ATL or TPA, 517 positions.

There were people senior to 1363 who voluntarily bid 717 FO, and there were people who were senior to to number 784 who bid SWA 737 FO or 717 FO(not very many if any at all for the 717 FO).

The hire dates for the above seniority levels is:

784 = 7/2004
1363 = 4/2007
Hugo Stiglitz is offline  
Old 01-04-2014, 09:46 PM
  #15  
Regional FO
 
BahamaBreeze's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: DH8D FO
Posts: 28
Default

Did this TPA base ever pan out?
Are there any airlines based out of TPA?
BahamaBreeze is offline  
Old 01-04-2014, 10:04 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blakman7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 270
Default

Originally Posted by BahamaBreeze View Post
Did this TPA base ever pan out?
Are there any airlines based out of TPA?
Did not pan out and I doubt it will anytime soon; if at all for that matter. It was more of an incentive to sign a piece of paper although hundreds will disagree. It'd be nice if it did pan out though. I think Silver Airways (former Gulfstream International) has a base in Tampa if I'm not mistaken.
blakman7 is offline  
Old 01-07-2014, 08:38 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by blakman7 View Post
Did not pan out and I doubt it will anytime soon; if at all for that matter. It was more of an incentive to sign a piece of paper although hundreds will disagree. It'd be nice if it did pan out though. I think Silver Airways (former Gulfstream International) has a base in Tampa if I'm not mistaken.
Yup... The TPA base was another carrot to ensure a 50%+1 yes vote.
SlipKid is offline  
Old 01-09-2014, 10:06 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: 737
Posts: 190
Default

Seems like they overshot by 30% or more
Bwipilot is offline  
Old 01-09-2014, 01:53 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,603
Default

Originally Posted by Bwipilot View Post
Seems like they overshot by 30% or more
Well that's kinda par for the course isn't it?

WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:04 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,603
Default

Originally Posted by aupilot View Post
Out of curiosity, as a former 737 pilot for AirTran, what is happening to the 737 guys in Atlanta if there are no plans for a 737 domicile?
Former AT?! Are you now at AJX? How long ago did you leave?

Last edited by UAL T38 Phlyer; 01-10-2014 at 04:01 AM. Reason: Security
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dwight Schrute
Southwest
592
10-07-2011 10:06 AM
shado
Southwest
268
09-09-2011 03:08 PM
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
KiloAlpha
Major
16
11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices