Search
Notices

New SWA 717 TPA Domicile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2014, 07:53 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

"Southwest Airlines commits to establishing an Atlanta domicile with a minimum of fifteen (15) overnighting B717 aircraft by January 1, 2015, unless otherwise mutually agreed by both parties."

So, did 'both parties' (SWAPA being one of them, and SWA the other - or was it AT ALPA and SWAPA - or was it AT ALPA and SWA?) agree to a change, or can a side letter be deemed mute if management sells the airplane out from under you?

Not looking to stir up a fuss, just wondering if a LOA or side letter or what have you is still binding in this situation.
Sniper is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 05:49 AM
  #22  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
"Southwest Airlines commits to establishing an Atlanta domicile with a minimum of fifteen (15) overnighting B717 aircraft by January 1, 2015, unless otherwise mutually agreed by both parties."

So, did 'both parties' (SWAPA being one of them, and SWA the other - or was it AT ALPA and SWAPA - or was it AT ALPA and SWA?) agree to a change, or can a side letter be deemed mute if management sells the airplane out from under you?

Not looking to stir up a fuss, just wondering if a LOA or side letter or what have you is still binding in this situation.
Sniper, I wish someone could answer this question, but unfortunately it's just part of a long string of lies and half truths that were told to try and get a deal done. All we are told now is "our plans changed," but they never came back to smooth things over. One would think they would have at least came back and tried to make it right to those effected, but there seems to be a lack of integrity within the organization.
Haywood is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 01:38 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

Just wondering. Aren't all the 717s going to be at DAL by the end of 2015? Why would they advertise a base for a fleet will be gone within a year of base opening (or will it convert to B737)?
qball is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 06:20 AM
  #24  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by qball View Post
Just wondering. Aren't all the 717s going to be at DAL by the end of 2015? Why would they advertise a base for a fleet will be gone within a year of base opening (or will it convert to B737)?
Because at the time this plan was announced (2011) the 717 was still slated to become a southwest fleet type. A bunch of AirTran pilots bid, and were awarded it. It was part of their plan to get the pilots at AirTran on the band wagon. Maybe even got some of the SWA pilots on the band wagon. Either way they reneged on the deal.
Haywood is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 02:01 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Flys135s's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Tail Surfing on a 737
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Haywood View Post
Because at the time this plan was announced (2011) the 717 was still slated to become a southwest fleet type. A bunch of AirTran pilots bid, and were awarded it. It was part of their plan to get the pilots at AirTran on the band wagon. Maybe even got some of the SWA pilots on the band wagon. Either way they reneged on the deal.
Because oil prices went up and made the 717 obsolete. Do you think Southwest should have continued flying the 717's and lost money just so a few pilots wouldn't feel slighted? Kind of losing sight of the big picture, which is that they are in it to make money. If they can make more money with the 737 then get rid of the 717's.
Flys135s is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 04:47 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,603
Default

Originally Posted by Flys135s View Post
Because oil prices went up and made the 717 obsolete. Do you think Southwest should have continued flying the 717's and lost money just so a few pilots wouldn't feel slighted? Kind of losing sight of the big picture, which is that they are in it to make money. If they can make more money with the 737 then get rid of the 717's.
You're pretty clueless dude. How is a 717 more inefficient than a POS Classic? Think about it. Fuel burn, mx cost.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 04:55 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

The Classic is a dying breed. I presume SWA is replacing them as quickly as possible.
Packrat is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 04:58 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

Without a dog in the fight, but why would Delta lease a loser like the 717?

Originally Posted by Flys135s View Post
Because oil prices went up and made the 717 obsolete. Do you think Southwest should have continued flying the 717's and lost money just so a few pilots wouldn't feel slighted? Kind of losing sight of the big picture, which is that they are in it to make money. If they can make more money with the 737 then get rid of the 717's.
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 05:02 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,603
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop View Post
Without a dog in the fight, but why would Delta lease a loser like the 717?
Bingo. Because it's a pretty efficient, low mx aircraft.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 01-16-2014, 05:03 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Bingo. Because it's a pretty efficient, low mx aircraft.
Or because its a modern DC-9.
Packrat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dwight Schrute
Southwest
592
10-07-2011 10:06 AM
shado
Southwest
268
09-09-2011 03:08 PM
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
KiloAlpha
Major
16
11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices