![]() |
Adios Wright Ammendment
|
.....and the unfair slot controlled monopoly begins.
|
Originally Posted by Laramie
(Post 1745388)
Dear Dumbass,
We were forced out of "slot controlled" DFW the day we bought Airtran. Enjoy your day. Even you guys have to admit there is definitely some sort of backroom dealings going on. |
Who cares? Just fly the plane and let managers and bean counters manage. As long as your paycheck cashes and you have lots of time off to pursue some interest outside of aviation it really isn't worth anybody's time or worry.
|
Originally Posted by Laramie
(Post 1745388)
Dear Dumbass,
We were forced out of "slot controlled" DFW the day we bought Airtran. Enjoy your day. Ohhhhh reeeeeeeeally? |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1745357)
.....and the unfair slot controlled monopoly begins.
Typical DL pilot. |
Originally Posted by Rsv4lyfe
(Post 1745522)
You had all the gates you wanted in DFW. :confused::rolleyes:
Typical DL pilot. Yup.. But wait.... you got gates at DCA... and LGA... why shouldn't DAL be open also? SWA is terrified of competition. Absolutely terrified. And they should be. Shenanigans. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1745357)
.....and the unfair slot controlled monopoly begins.
|
Originally Posted by shoelu
(Post 1745744)
You can scream that Love is slot controlled as much as you like, but that does not make it true.
|
Originally Posted by shoelu
(Post 1745744)
You can scream that Love is slot controlled as much as you like, but that does not make it true.
Still doesn't change the fact though that SWA can't handle true competition. Virgin America??? pfffffft. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1745527)
Yup.. But wait.... you got gates at DCA... and LGA... why shouldn't DAL be open also? SWA is terrified of competition. Absolutely terrified. And they should be.
Shenanigans. |
Originally Posted by paxhauler85
(Post 1745795)
Good point T! You're absolutely right; they've gotten to where they are today with that running scared mentality.
Compete. If you're so good. Oh... and FWIW... thanks for the 717s. You'll be seeing them again at DAL. ;) (Apologies to the Airtran guys) |
Delta (DL) #2255 ? 13-Oct-2014 ? KATL - KDAL ? FlightAware
Seeing this does put a smile on my face. Anderson wasn't kidding! |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1745817)
Delta (DL) #2255 ? 13-Oct-2014 ? KATL - KDAL ? FlightAware
Seeing this does put a smile on my face. Anderson wasn't kidding! Southwest Airlines Co. said Wednesday it has agreed to let Delta use one of its gates to operate Delta’s five daily flights to and from its home base of Atlanta. United Airlines Inc. will lend ticket counters and other operational space. After that, Delta will have to persuade one of the three carriers with Love Field gates to continue making room for its Atlanta flights. “We have let Delta know that we are willing to potentially accommodate them on a portion of a gate through Jan. 6, 2015, in order to avoid inconveniencing passengers booked on Delta flights from Love Field during that time,” Southwest vice president and general counsel Mark Shaw said Wednesday evening. Delta to keep flying from Love Field ? at least for a few months more | Dallas Morning News |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1745799)
Yeah yeah yeah.. and we all declared bankruptcy and all that crap.:rolleyes: Nobody cares about that. It is irrelevant. They are worried now. If they weren't.. why has it been three years since SWAPA signed a contract? Where's the love? hmmmmmm?
Compete. If you're so good. Oh... and FWIW... thanks for the 717s. You'll be seeing them again at DAL. ;) (Apologies to the Airtran guys) If your definition of love is jumping all over a mediocre contract TA, then I'd prefer not to have any. I think most non-Delta pilots would agree. |
Originally Posted by paxhauler85
(Post 1746151)
Convenient of you to mention SWA not being able to bend their employee groups over like Delta did you guys in bankruptcy. Doubt anyone there wishes they had that opportunity. That said, perhaps the SWA guys have their goals set a little higher than 4/8/3/3, or whatever pitiful raise the majority bit on at DL. There's plenty of "love" between the employees and management, but labor contracts with a billion+ dollar price tag don't come easy or quickly.
If your definition of love is jumping all over a mediocre contract TA, then I'd prefer not to have any. I think most non-Delta pilots would agree. Oh, and haven't you heard? All ours are cost neutral.:rolleyes: But this thread wasn't about that anyway. I really couldn't care less what they do on their contract as long as they raise some kind of bar. What this thread is about is their government blessed monopoly at one airport. I'm guessing that there will be a lawsuit involved at some point in time and access to other carriers that will really compete with them will be granted. But for now enjoy the Delta 717 service. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1746232)
And how long have they been waiting for a contract? Every year, inflation however fortunately low.. eats into their earnings. But I'll betcha that 4/8/3/3 would be fine with them... Of course I could be wrong on that, but they have not ever to my knowledge had that kind of contract. Hopefully shoelu will chime in on that. Either way though, inflation still exists, and when the bubble starts to burst, it will get bigger. And then where will a contract that is stuck in limbo be getting you? 0/0/0/0/0/0/25/5/5 is worth a helluva lot less than 4/8/3/3... and start again. It's just math, but that seems to be mythical on these boards.
Oh, and haven't you heard? All ours are cost neutral.:rolleyes: But this thread wasn't about that anyway. I really couldn't care less what they do on their contract as long as they raise some kind of bar. What this thread is about is their government blessed monopoly at one airport. I'm guessing that there will be a lawsuit involved at some point in time and access to other carriers that will really compete with them will be granted. But for now enjoy the Delta 717 service. There very well may be a lawsuit at some point, but the 5 party agreement is very clear. There are no common use gates at Love, they are now and will continue to be spoken for. The city of Dallas can force other airlines to be accommodated by the current gate owners but only if those gates are not fully utilized which is identified as 5 turns or 10 flights a day. If those minimums are met no one can force the gate owners to share their gates. Delta had every right to raise objections when they were not allowed gate space in the current situation. Although both United and VA have announced service that will fulfill the stipulations of full utilization, they are not currently offering that service which leaves room for Delta to use the gates they formally had access to. If all parties begin flying the schedules they have put forth in January, all gates will be "fully utilized" and Delta will no longer be accommodated. |
Originally Posted by shoelu
(Post 1746355)
I'd take 4/8/3/3 as long as it involved retro pay which has multiple past precedents. Of course we are not trying to dig our way out from a 42% pay cut, if we were I'm not sure that would have gotten my yes vote.
There very well may be a lawsuit at some point, but the 5 party agreement is very clear. There are no common use gates at Love, they are now and will continue to be spoken for. The city of Dallas can force other airlines to be accommodated by the current gate owners but only if those gates are not fully utilized which is identified as 5 turns or 10 flights a day. If those minimums are met no one can force the gate owners to share their gates. Delta had every right to raise objections when they were not allowed gate space in the current situation. Although both United and VA have announced service that will fulfill the stipulations of full utilization, they are not currently offering that service which leaves room for Delta to use the gates they formally had access to. If all parties begin flying the schedules they have put forth in January, all gates will be "fully utilized" and Delta will no longer be accommodated. As to the second part of the post: So how then is DAL any different than LGA? You had no slot rights there, and convinced Schumer that it was in the best interest of the consumer for you to get them hence our mired down deal with USAir. IMHO, that set the precedence, and SWA should be forced to divest some of those gates in the interest of competition. Probably won't happen because for some strange reason you are still the industry darlings, but it is a clear double standard. I'll betcha we will still retain those 5 flights/day after the dust settles, but any more will take a lot of work. |
Record time
To go off topic.
Maybe southwest airlines is owed some reciprocity after having been forced to deal with the right amendment for 30+ years. It was a bid to put them out of business after all. Not sure why you Delta guys would be worried you have a completely different product. If you're looking for fight you should going to DFW or better yet go to Denver as United's on the ropes. If you did that though you'd really have to compete with Southwest. |
Originally Posted by Boogie Nights
(Post 1748558)
If you did that though you'd really have to compete with Southwest.
|
Originally Posted by Boogie Nights
(Post 1748558)
To go off topic.
Maybe southwest airlines is owed some reciprocity after having been forced to deal with the right amendment for 30+ years. It was a bid to put them out of business after all. Not sure why you Delta guys would be worried you have a completely different product. If you're looking for fight you should going to DFW or better yet go to Denver as United's on the ropes. If you did that though you'd really have to compete with Southwest. |
Yes yes you are
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1748604)
Are we not already really competing in ATL? :confused:
Let SWA enjoy the passing of a law that has been a thorn in their side for 30 plus years |
Originally Posted by Boogie Nights
(Post 1748558)
To go off topic.
Maybe southwest airlines is owed some reciprocity after having been forced to deal with the right amendment for 30+ years. It was a bid to put them out of business after all. Not sure why you Delta guys would be worried you have a completely different product. If you're looking for fight you should going to DFW or better yet go to Denver as United's on the ropes. If you did that though you'd really have to compete with Southwest. |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1748604)
Are we not already really competing in ATL? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Boogie Nights
(Post 1748709)
Assuming you area Delta guy SWA definitely underestimated the demand for their product in ATL and Delta is cleaning up. Delta IMHO also has the best product of any legacy. My only point is that it is beneath the Delta guys to have sour grapes about DAL.
Let SWA enjoy the passing of a law that has been a thorn in their side for 30 plus years |
T,
Was the law made to squeeze SWA or not? The law backfiring isn't SWA's problem. Enjoy the perch, the view is awesome. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1748771)
Dude that law is what allowed you to grow into what you are. Had it not been for that you would be on the scrap heap of airlines alongside ones too numerous to mention.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1748771)
Dude that law is what allowed you to grow into what you are. Had it not been for that you would be on the scrap heap of airlines alongside ones too numerous to mention.
The Wright Amendment was passed AFTER Herb prevailed in the Supreme Court and got the right to continue operating out of DAL. In no way did it help SWA. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1748771)
Dude that law is what allowed you to grow into what you are. Had it not been for that you would be on the scrap heap of airlines alongside ones too numerous to mention.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1748771)
Dude that law is what allowed you to grow into what you are. Had it not been for that you would be on the scrap heap of airlines alongside ones too numerous to mention.
Calm down dude or you will bust a vein. Just a concerned suggestion. SWA dodged and weaved and others faltered. We may have to deal with our own issues in due time. The Oscar |
Oh... and FWIW... thanks for the 717s. You'll be seeing them again at DAL. (Apologies to the Airtran guys)
__________________ DAL pilots were selected because they will never strike under any circumstances. - Carl Yeah, you wait till those lovely Longbeach Surprises have you in a belly flop, when you open you mouth and look you'll see the radome of a 717, that's how far up it will be. Those frames were mediocre at best. They were glad to get rid of them. One sat for weeks waiting on parts. Hello....but you are once again right enjoy the cookies..... RD |
Originally Posted by Boogie Nights
(Post 1748558)
To go off topic.
Maybe southwest airlines is owed some reciprocity after having been forced to deal with the right amendment for 30+ years. It was a bid to put them out of business after all. Not sure why you Delta guys would be worried you have a completely different product. If you're looking for fight you should going to DFW or better yet go to Denver as United's on the ropes. If you did that though you'd really have to compete with Southwest. |
...yawwwwnnn.
This horse has been beaten enough... back to staring at Boogie Nights avatar. |
Any plans for SWA to fly from KDAL to CUN
|
Originally Posted by jmcke
(Post 1781467)
Any plans for SWA to fly from KDAL to CUN
|
Originally Posted by jmcke
(Post 1781467)
Any plans for SWA to fly from KDAL to CUN
Prohibited by the still very much in effect Wright Amendment. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands