![]() |
Awesome....
|
I wasn't aware we started aerial tours of the lovely west Texas landscape
|
I believe the 5 original NEO’s went down for a bleed system mod once the new NEO’s arrived on property. Probably doing systematic test flights.
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2761140)
I believe the 5 original NEO’s went down for a bleed system mod once the new NEO’s arrived on property. Probably doing systematic test flights.
|
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2761216)
It isn't working.
|
Originally Posted by David Puddy
(Post 2761377)
Time for a big order of CS300/A220s....
Oh, and f!@# Boeing and their antique POS. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2761512)
Seeing as the A220 isn't having the same issues with the 3rd stage bearing or the fume events of its big brother I could see that as a real possibility. AB might be cutting a sweet deal to keep us in the family.
Oh, and f!@# Boeing and their antique POS. Or did you wash out of Boeing test pilot school and you are disgruntled? Calm down buddy. |
Originally Posted by Halon1211
(Post 2761546)
Has somebody from Spirit training department told you we are getting the 737’s and forcing you to fly it?
Or did you wash out of Boeing test pilot school and you are disgruntled? Calm down buddy. |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2761589)
Neither. But Boeing is making a sales pitch for their narrow body and their 'code share' partners airframe as well. The 73 is a 60 year old POS that was a great bird for the 1960's but one that is dated, small, fuel inefficient (as far as competitors go), uncomfortable for the crew and passengers, and would be a step backwards in most every way conceivable. As Spirit management looks towards the future I hope they'd look their as well instead of the museums for airframes. Seeing as NK will most likely forever be a narrow body operator we don't have the ability of bidding out of whatever NB we operate. If we're forced to remain NB pilots for our careers I'd rather do so in a modern, comfortable airframe.
|
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2761589)
Neither. But Boeing is making a sales pitch for their narrow body and their 'code share' partners airframe as well. The 73 is a 60 year old POS that was a great bird for the 1960's but one that is dated, small, fuel inefficient (as far as competitors go), uncomfortable for the crew and passengers, and would be a step backwards in most every way conceivable. As Spirit management looks towards the future I hope they'd look their as well instead of the museums for airframes. Seeing as NK will most likely forever be a narrow body operator we don't have the ability of bidding out of whatever NB we operate. If we're forced to remain NB pilots for our careers I'd rather do so in a modern, comfortable airframe.
|
Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
(Post 2761809)
You’re assuming spirit cares about our comfort. I can guarantee the type of cockpit is not on their priority list anywhere.
|
Originally Posted by putzin
(Post 2761865)
It's not on the list of ANY airline.
Filler |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 2761589)
The 73 is a 60 year old POS that was a great bird for the 1960's but one that is dated, small, fuel inefficient (as far as competitors go), uncomfortable for the crew and passengers, and would be a step backwards in most every way conceivable.
It has several advantages over the AB. Real auto-throttle, which moves and the pilot can be override. Real V-Nav, which intercepts vertical path. No brake temp issues. Sturdier, flies like a real airplane, more stable in turbulence and fun to fly. Full Speed-brakes descent is a beauty... Does not rat on you! You do have to perform a real engine out No tray table Not as comfy for longer flights Definitely NOT a POS by any means... |
Originally Posted by Jett i son
(Post 2762311)
Have you actually flown the 73, or just don't like the jumpseat?
It has several advantages over the AB. Real auto-throttle, which moves and the pilot can be override. Real V-Nav, which intercepts vertical path. No brake temp issues. Sturdier, flies like a real airplane, more stable in turbulence and fun to fly. Full Speed-brakes descent is a beauty... Does not rat on you! You do have to perform a real engine out No tray table Not as comfy for longer flights Definitely NOT a POS by any means... I agree I’d happily take a Boeing (but I would miss the try table). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Jett i son
(Post 2762311)
Have you actually flown the 73, or just don't like the jumpseat?
It has several advantages over the AB. Real auto-throttle, which moves and the pilot can be override. Real V-Nav, which intercepts vertical path. No brake temp issues. Sturdier, flies like a real airplane, more stable in turbulence and fun to fly. Full Speed-brakes descent is a beauty... Does not rat on you! You do have to perform a real engine out No tray table Not as comfy for longer flights Definitely NOT a POS by any means... We could just as well ignore everything up to 500 degrees (if we were legally allowed to) and the performance would be the same. That's easily how hot their brakes get but since there's no indicator, out of sight out of mind Also the need to override the auto thrust (at least in the Airbus) is non existent. if you understand the logic and fly it like a bus, there's zero need to ever override it. |
unequivocally the 737 is a POS in it's current environment. Fine 20 years ago as an 1.5 hour shuttle. A misery sandwich on a transcon or deep south flight.
A mix of more 320/321 and the 200 series would be just fine. Want to fly in a nice 737, get a 757. |
Originally Posted by Jett i son
(Post 2762311)
Have you actually flown the 73, or just don't like the jumpseat?
It has several advantages over the AB. Real auto-throttle, which moves and the pilot can be override. Real V-Nav, which intercepts vertical path. No brake temp issues. Sturdier, flies like a real airplane, more stable in turbulence and fun to fly. Full Speed-brakes descent is a beauty... Does not rat on you! You do have to perform a real engine out No tray table Not as comfy for longer flights Definitely NOT a POS by any means... |
Originally Posted by elmetal
(Post 2762503)
Also the need to override the auto thrust (at least in the Airbus) is non existent. if you understand the logic and fly it like a bus, there's zero need to ever override it.
Do you understand that logic? :D |
Originally Posted by Jett i son
(Post 2764221)
It's NOT a need, it's an option which comes in handy in W/S, at night, in SJO ... where I use manual thrust.
Do you understand that logic? :D |
Deleted.....
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands