![]() |
Instructor direct to right seat UA vs Spirit
Which one would you pick?
UA started to train their pilot from zero hour. Spirit signed the agreement with ATP, and instructors can straight to right seat in the Bus. Just curious what motivate candidates come to spirit these day? |
Does the zero hour training at UA require in interview ahead of starting training and/or a college degree. I don’t think going to ATP guarantees anything at spirit.
|
Originally Posted by dualinput
(Post 3370788)
Does the zero hour training at UA require in interview ahead of starting training and/or a college degree. I don’t think going to ATP guarantees anything at spirit.
|
Aren’t you required to spend some time at a United express carrier before you get to United mainline?
|
Originally Posted by Myfingershurt
(Post 3370791)
Aren’t you required to spend some time at a United express carrier before you get to United mainline?
I am trying to figure out if Spirit management has a plan to deal with attrition issue. Based on the email from ALPA today, seems like management didn’t have a plan with ALPA at all. |
Originally Posted by RJpanda
(Post 3370812)
18months time line to accumulate 1500hours as instructor, no college degree required, two years in United Express.
I am trying to figure out if Spirit management has a plan to deal with attrition issue. Based on the email from ALPA today, seems like management didn’t have a plan with ALPA at all. neither management acknowledge low pay is the issue. |
Originally Posted by RJpanda
(Post 3370812)
18months time line to accumulate 1500hours as instructor, no college degree required, two years in United Express.
I am trying to figure out if Spirit management has a plan to deal with attrition issue. Based on the email from ALPA today, seems like management didn’t have a plan with ALPA at all. |
Originally Posted by gatorbird
(Post 3370992)
There's no "seems like" to it bud, the message was quite clear.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371054)
I'm a bit concerned. We're about 1.5 years away from the merger closing. We'll need a new CBA before then. I don't see us getting a new contract any earlier, since it will be nullified. I don't see a pay increase stopping attrition. Management already knows if they make it rain, people will still leave. While I don't think the management group would spend millions to let this thing die on the vine, it seems like they aren't getting ahead of the situation, either.
Merger will close this year. JCBA who knows. My guess is TA middle of 2023. Hopefully if it’s trash it will be voted down and a good TA will manifest by end of 2023. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371054)
I'm a bit concerned. We're about 1.5 years away from the merger closing. We'll need a new CBA before then. I don't see us getting a new contract any earlier, since it will be nullified. I don't see a pay increase stopping attrition. Management already knows if they make it rain, people will still leave. While I don't think the management group would spend millions to let this thing die on the vine, it seems like they aren't getting ahead of the situation, either.
You forget we were still net positive for pilot growth last month. We are still turning pilots away at interviews, and classes are full. Yes growing only 15 pilots a month is not sustainable for the number of aircraft coming, however the trend has not established itself… yet. I can’t see the company rushing in with a MOU to augment compensation until the potential attrition problem is actually a problem. Let them be reactionary, if the situation gets to the point where planes get parked and recruitment dries up, then we have even more leverage with a JCBA. |
Originally Posted by FahQ2
(Post 3371205)
You forget we were still net positive for pilot growth last month. We are still turning pilots away at interviews, and classes are full.
Yes growing only 15 pilots a month is not sustainable for the number of aircraft coming, however the trend has not established itself… yet. I can’t see the company rushing in with a MOU to augment compensation until the potential attrition problem is actually a problem. Let them be reactionary, if the situation gets to the point where planes get parked and recruitment dries up, then we have even more leverage with a JCBA. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371222)
From the Town Hall, they said the current attrition surprised them. I don’t think they have a true pulse on what’s going on. Sure, we gained 15 pilots, but we lost 40 pilots who were on the seniority list flying and replaced them with pilots who are in training. If this trend continues, even for a few months, it’s going to be very difficult to staff the flying we have, much less new aircraft. It’s even more of a disaster when someone leaves in the first year.
Still when you look at it objectively, it has not become a problem yet. January could be the start of a trend, or it could be an anomaly that lasts a couple months, but there is not a big enough data set to indicate either way. I am not immune to speculation, but worst case is I make a lot of money this summer with premium flying, and the company throws some pre JCBA money at our newer guys. It certainly doesn’t keep me up at night. |
Town halls are propaganda events. Anyone that uses those for information is naive.
|
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3371222)
From the Town Hall, they said the current attrition surprised them. I don’t think they have a true pulse on what’s going on. Sure, we gained 15 pilots, but we lost 40 pilots who were on the seniority list flying and replaced them with pilots who are in training. If this trend continues, even for a few months, it’s going to be very difficult to staff the flying we have, much less new aircraft. It’s even more of a disaster when someone leaves in the first year.
|
The townhalls are really getting good almost getting goebbels esque. “ looking into cadet/flow programs?” - no we are not. Not 24 hours later….ATP thingy announced!. “We are talking with ALPA yada yada yada”. MEC email “ no they haven’t even approached us”.
|
Originally Posted by 93Sierra
(Post 3371438)
The townhalls are really getting good almost getting goebbels esque. “ looking into cadet/flow programs?” - no we are not. Not 24 hours later….ATP thingy announced!. “We are talking with ALPA yada yada yada”. MEC email “ no they haven’t even approached us”.
"Are you exploring merger options?" "We are not actively exploring merger options or consolidation Merger announced This has been in the works for a long time, pretty clear now. Town Halls are a joke when a moderator cherry picks fluff questions, you cant even get real questions asked. Not that I expect them to, but another example why its a joke. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3371443)
And the biggest:
"Are you exploring merger options?" "We are not actively exploring merger options or consolidation Merger announced This has been in the works for a long time, pretty clear now. Town Halls are a joke when a moderator cherry picks fluff questions, you cant even get real questions asked. Not that I expect them to, but another example why its a joke. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3371443)
And the biggest:
"Are you exploring merger options?" "We are not actively exploring merger options or consolidation Merger announced This has been in the works for a long time, pretty clear now. Town Halls are a joke when a moderator cherry picks fluff questions, you cant even get real questions asked. Not that I expect them to, but another example why its a joke. Otherwise I agree. |
Originally Posted by Cyio
(Post 3371475)
Except for that last part, they did go down the list of questions that came in live and had upvotes. Ted even said let’s get through then.
Otherwise I agree. You ask, it gets reviewed, and either posted or sidelined. Try asking a question that isnt about uniforms, beards, Hawaii, or any of the other fluff questions; see if it gets posted |
Originally Posted by gatorbird
(Post 3370992)
There's no "seems like" to it bud, the message was quite clear.
|
Originally Posted by IamEssential
(Post 3371533)
Yep, management was too busy getting this merger done and basically ignored the attrition that was increasing exponentially under their feet. They were just hoping it worked itself out and that this merger would be great news to pilots and help slow down the attrition. It is having the opposite effect, pilots are not idiots and they know that mergers rarely go well for the pilot groups. Upgrade times will continue to go up and efficiencies will be "gained" in this merger.
Who wants to wait around to find out how this all goes down when there’s unprecedented opportunities elsewhere? |
Anyone who has any substantial time left should get out of this place. All of the things that made it tolerable ( qol ) upgrades ( general attitude ) is out the window. As said before they will merge this into 1 giant cost savings trash pit. If you think anything you like in this contract will stay. Your wrong because that costs money. If your a captain get lawyered up for all the altitude deviations and call the tower that are coming your way ( but hey your fo went to atp ). If your an fo prepare to be stuck at an airline your emarrased to say you work for for your next foreseeable future because guess what all these new hires will leave after 2 or 3 years just as you should.
|
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3371723)
Anyone who has any substantial time left should get out of this place. All of the things that made it tolerable ( qol ) upgrades ( general attitude ) is out the window. As said before they will merge this into 1 giant cost savings trash pit. If you think anything you like in this contract will stay. Your wrong because that costs money. If your a captain get lawyered up for all the altitude deviations and call the tower that are coming your way ( but hey your fo went to atp ). If your an fo prepare to be stuck at an airline your emarrased to say you work for for your next foreseeable future because guess what all these new hires will leave after 2 or 3 years just as you should.
|
(Embarrassed to say you work for) well buddy not every pilot goes around telling everyone they’re a pilot to begin with, nor cares about the opinion of other people.
|
Originally Posted by TOGALOCK
(Post 3371734)
Yes, because your prediction about how Frontier and Spirit would NEVER ever merge because it made absolutely no sense and anyone who thought differently was dumb and “pi$$ed you off” was so very spot on. You’re an angry pilot upset and burdened by your own life choices. If you will soon be my fellow pilot, you really do need to follow your own advice and get out immediately.
Are so nieve to think that this is going to be good for labour ? What part of what I said do you not agree with. Frankly I was wrong about the merger 100 percent but now that we're already given the run around it's clear to see the pain in your qol and wallet is coming |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3371723)
Anyone who has any substantial time left should get out of this place. All of the things that made it tolerable ( qol ) upgrades ( general attitude ) is out the window. As said before they will merge this into 1 giant cost savings trash pit. If you think anything you like in this contract will stay. Your wrong because that costs money. If your a captain get lawyered up for all the altitude deviations and call the tower that are coming your way ( but hey your fo went to atp ). If your an fo prepare to be stuck at an airline your emarrased to say you work for for your next foreseeable future because guess what all these new hires will leave after 2 or 3 years just as you should.
|
Originally Posted by Ratm0820
(Post 3371738)
(Embarrassed to say you work for) well buddy not every pilot goes around telling everyone they’re a pilot to begin with, nor cares about the opinion of other people.
|
No I’m 26 and on my second airline, and have an abundance of other hobbies and things to talk about other than which company I fly a metal tube around for. Nobody cares.
|
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3371740)
Bendo ?
Are so nieve to think that this is going to be good for labour ? What part of what I said do you not agree with. Frankly I was wrong about the merger 100 percent but now that we're already given the run around it's clear to see the pain in your qol and wallet is coming |
Originally Posted by Trylabyte
(Post 3371740)
Bendo ?
Are so nieve to think that this is going to be good for labour ? What part of what I said do you not agree with. Frankly I was wrong about the merger 100 percent but now that we're already given the run around it's clear to see the pain in your qol and wallet is coming The success of this merger, the new airline, and all of our careers hinge on our ability to get pilots. So, I have a problem with people screaming that the sky is falling based on rumor and personal feeling alone. It scares prospective applicants away. Information on here should be neutral facts and let people decide for themselves. Information that shows unity and our combined pilot group’s desire to fight for what we deserve. Ultra negativity AS WELL AS talk of how this will be all unicorns and rainbows on the other side are equaling damaging. |
Originally Posted by Voski
(Post 3371609)
Exactly.
Who wants to wait around to find out how this all goes down when there’s unprecedented opportunities elsewhere? Buy this guy a drink - Heck - give him the entire bottle. |
Originally Posted by TOGALOCK
(Post 3371783)
What runaround? The fact that the only people who know all the details of two multi-billion dollar companies merging are the ones with an absolute need to know? You’re upset that they aren’t telling the worker bees all the details? Details that could be used against us by the DOJ and competing airlines to try to block the merger? Details that competing airlines would use to get ahead of any competitive advantage this merger will create for us? With the way pilots come on APC and Facebook talking about every little rumor they hear, why do you think the company doesn’t want us to know sensitive information.
The success of this merger, the new airline, and all of our careers hinge on our ability to get pilots. So, I have a problem with people screaming that the sky is falling based on rumor and personal feeling alone. It scares prospective applicants away. Information on here should be neutral facts and let people decide for themselves. Information that shows unity and our combined pilot group’s desire to fight for what we deserve. Ultra negativity AS WELL AS talk of how this will be all unicorns and rainbows on the other side are equaling damaging. |
Originally Posted by RJpanda
(Post 3370812)
18months time line to accumulate 1500hours as instructor, no college degree required, two years in United Express.
I am trying to figure out if Spirit management has a plan to deal with attrition issue. Based on the email from ALPA today, seems like management didn’t have a plan with ALPA at all. |
Originally Posted by MrIncredible
(Post 3375092)
Aviate is a scam
|
Originally Posted by RJpanda
(Post 3370758)
Which one would you pick?
UA started to train their pilot from zero hour. Spirit signed the agreement with ATP, and instructors can straight to right seat in the Bus. Just curious what motivate candidates come to spirit these day? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands