![]() |
Originally Posted by Douglas9
(Post 3387949)
6 hours and counting trying to get ahold of scheduling today.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3387613)
Yes, you are right. I didn't explain that well. However, the fact that the administration is trying to block the alliance doesn't bode well for our merger
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3387995)
Disagree. There are no serious restraint of trade issues with the Sprontier merger.
|
Know what'll cause higher ticket prices? Out of control inflation. Skyrocketing oil too. Maybe those knuckleheads should keep their eye on the ball and stop playing in the dirt in right field.
|
These economic illiterates don’t understand that raising ticket prices kills the model because we don’t offer the amenities that the more expensive airlines do. Basically, it’s grandstanding by those who couldn’t be bothered to know or care for those who don’t care that they don’t care.
|
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 3388072)
These economic illiterates don’t understand that raising ticket prices kills the model because we don’t offer the amenities that the more expensive airlines do.
|
Originally Posted by cantflylist
(Post 3388109)
Not if SAVE-ULCC raise prices in proportion to LCC/Legacy price hikes
|
I wouldn’t put much stock in any letter written for or against the merger. Most likely the merger will happen because people in high places will be paid to make it happen. That said they aren’t wrong in saying it could make customer service worse, I mean we (and frontier) aren’t exactly known for our customer service, and the fact that we have a lot of overlap isn’t a good thing either, but again pretty sure it will happen as someone will be paid to make it happen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by cantflylist
(Post 3388109)
Not if SAVE-ULCC raise prices in proportion to LCC/Legacy price hikes
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3387995)
Disagree. There are no serious restraint of trade issues with the Sprontier merger.
Google mergers blocked by the Biden Administration. There's multiple pages of examples. This merger is definitely no guarantee. |
Originally Posted by beech_nut
(Post 3387651)
They aren't concerned because they did it, if not by design then by utter and complete incompetence.
|
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3387776)
…Spirit pilots will be losers.
Originally Posted by GWY320
(Post 3387787)
I’m hearing projections where we will be losers.
Originally Posted by 93Sierra
(Post 3387835)
This merger brings nothing but a crap sammich. My life won’t be better because of it only worse.
|
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3388430)
Again, can anyone provide any specifics?
So probably people need to take a breath, grow up, and realize this isn’t the end of the world. Personally I would be more concerned with a displacement bid coming in days vs seniority list integration methods that people are pulling out their back sides. |
The SLI will be arbitrated as they all are. Anyone claiming Spirit pilots will be the big loser is speculating out of their outflow valves.
|
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3388430)
Again, can anyone provide any specifics?
|
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3388552)
Ask around. Not posting on here. For your health.
For your health, don’t get wrapped up in speculation from those who speculate just to be negative. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3388560)
Ask around for peoples opinion based on their own speculation. Yup, reliable info. Ask them too what the new company name will be, the new CEO and the next base, all wild guessed.
For your health, don’t get wrapped up in speculation from those who speculate just to be negative. |
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3388673)
Nothing but positves coming our way! What could go wrong? Management said this is gonna be the best merger ever!
|
Originally Posted by DrSteveBrule
(Post 3388673)
Nothing but positves coming our way! What could go wrong? Management said this is gonna be the best merger ever!
Barry: there's no black cloud out there regardless of what you're hearing. We have 10 applicants for every one opening we have. We have seen a slight uptick in attrition but we are a growth business and that just means we have to get creative with sim availability and training throughput. Our analysis shows that even if I have to open a flight academy and train every pilot I need from zero hours it will cost me $30M per year. That's less than 1% of revenue and will not hurt my business. Pilots only care about money and lifestyle. We have the money part covered. They will make the same money here as they would at Delta because we upgrade so much quicker. Our combined airline will have more bases and lifestyle will be great for them. I'm not worried about pilots. Ted: like Barry, we have seen a small uptick in attrition but we also have more than enough applicants and are still filling classes but we are also increasing our training capabilities. |
Originally Posted by DrDHD
(Post 3388686)
From Barclays fireside chat - 2/24/22
Barry: there's no black cloud out there regardless of what you're hearing. We have 10 applicants for every one opening we have. We have seen a slight uptick in attrition but we are a growth business and that just means we have to get creative with sim availability and training throughput. Our analysis shows that even if I have to open a flight academy and train every pilot I need from zero hours it will cost me $30M per year. That's less than 1% of revenue and will not hurt my business. Pilots only care about money and lifestyle. We have the money part covered. They will make the same money here as they would at Delta because we upgrade so much quicker. Our combined airline will have more bases and lifestyle will be great for them. I'm not worried about pilots. Ted: like Barry, we have seen a small uptick in attrition but we also have more than enough applicants and are still filling classes but we are also increasing our training capabilities. What do you think they will say? Haha. Seriously. |
Originally Posted by Ed Force One
(Post 3387767)
So legit question, do we want this merger or not?
Wouldn't our seniority accrue faster if each company stayed separate and grew organically behind us? VS merging to the size each eventually wants to be and effectively stagnating growth for a period? A merger would (possibly) help to expedite negotiations, but isn't that just short term? I honestly don't know. I'm mostly just along for the ride. (NK) |
Originally Posted by Macjet
(Post 3391061)
This is the 800 lb gorilla that our 'this is better than my regional' pilot groups can't seem to wrap their 'topless' heads around. Both groups are going to get Brandoned with the seniority stagnation and NK pilots won't even get a reach around having to work for Franke. This is the worst possible outcome for both groups and one can only hope that this merger is denied. Perhaps SPA MEC can make use of some of our M/A cheese to attempt to put a stop to this.
|
Originally Posted by AllOva736
(Post 3391093)
not that you’re not correct about some of this but for someone who preaches as much crap as you do I guess now is the time to sht or get off the pot. I imagine FO’s love listening to you preach about the orange man and bag on this place even though you’ll never leave.
|
The reality is that this merger is much bigger than anyone’s individual seniority. To think differently is short sighted and, frankly, selfish. The post-covid aviation industry is a brave new world when it comes to competition. The pre-covid koolaid from both companies about kicking butt and taking names is cute, but is now nothing more than a battle cry that could very easily be snuffed out if left to their individual means. Together, overnight Frontierit will become a size that could legitimately and fiercely compete in this new market.
Would slow organic growth better benefit each individual pilot in the short term? Absolutely! But, this career is about the long game. Not what’s happening tomorrow. There will be short term pain for some people, but once the merger waves subside, we will all be better for it in the long run. This isn’t about what’s best for any individual, it’s about what’s best for both groups as a whole going forward. Seniority doesn’t mean squat if your airline ends up as a chapter in a history book. Personally, I’m more than happy to give up a little seniority now for a better chance at job security and bigger seniority gains over the next 10, 15, 20+ years. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3388376)
Not sure what you are talking about.
Google mergers blocked by the Biden Administration. There's multiple pages of examples. This merger is definitely no guarantee.
Originally Posted by turbojet28
(Post 3388027)
Completely agree with this. My worry, though, is that logic won’t matter because we are dealing with an administration that makes nonsensical, knee-jerk decisions all the time. They don’t use facts and logic, they use fairy dust and unicorns to make decisions, and then gaslight the public about it when they get called out.
The DOJ cannot unilaterally block a merger. Just like the American US Airways merger which the DOJ opposed, they couldn’t prevent it. If the DOJ opposes a merger, the parties to the merger can fight it in court where a judge decides. That’s what happened with the American/Airways merger. The DOJ’s argument and data didn’t persuade the judge into thinking it violated antitrust laws and so it was approved with minor concessions.
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 3388474)
The SLI will be arbitrated as they all are.
I though that the SWA/ATN merger did not got to arbitration? I do know that the ASA/XJT SLI didn’t. It was mutually agreed upon by the merger committees without the use of a mediator, let along an arbitrator. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands