![]() |
Baby Bus for market advantage
JB makes it work. Airbus seems motivated to appeal to others with a similar model. Better keep an eye on who they are meeting with.
https://onemileatatime.com/insights/...us-a220-miami/ |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 3397115)
JB makes it work. Airbus seems motivated to appeal to others with a similar model. Better keep an eye on who they are meeting with.
https://onemileatatime.com/insights/...us-a220-miami/ |
Absolutely nothing! Lol
|
Haha. OR…Spirit takes the 319neos, which beat the 220 in many areas, and enjoys the benefits of the single fleet type.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3397472)
Haha. OR…Spirit takes the 319neos, which beat the 220 in many areas, and enjoys the benefits of the single fleet type.
|
Originally Posted by MCDUmanipulator
(Post 3397487)
In what areas exactly?
Range Payload Training commonality Parts commonality Parts availability |
Originally Posted by IamEssential
(Post 3397386)
I'm confused as to what this has to do with Spirit?
It’s unlikely they are pitching the 220 to DL or JB. Can’t imagine SWA or Alaska is interested either. It would be hard to believe that Airbus isn’t attempting to sell their latest and greatest to one of their best customers. Haven’t done the numbers yet but the combined NK/F9 fleet may become one of the world’s largest narrow bus operators? |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 3397534)
Reading into the story, this aircraft is here in the states, for the purpose of demo and promotion.
It’s unlikely they are pitching the 220 to DL or JB. Can’t imagine SWA or Alaska is interested either. It would be hard to believe that Airbus isn’t attempting to sell their latest and greatest to one of their best customers. Haven’t done the numbers yet but the combined NK/F9 fleet may become one of the world’s largest narrow bus operators? |
How do you make a profit at low margins? Quantity.
F9 has been moving towards more 321s. The time, effort and manpower to operate and turn a smaller capacity aircraft is going to very similar to a larger one in the same ballpark of size. I'd be willing to bet it makes a whole lot more sense to operate fewer large aircraft than more small aircraft... |
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3397563)
How do you make a profit at low margins? Quantity.
F9 has been moving towards more 321s. The time, effort and manpower to operate and turn a smaller capacity aircraft is going to very similar to a larger one in the same ballpark of size. I'd be willing to bet it makes a whole lot more sense to operate fewer large aircraft than more small aircraft... The ULCC bean counters are different than those of the legacies. |
Originally Posted by afterburn81
(Post 3397534)
Reading into the story, this aircraft is here in the states, for the purpose of demo and promotion.
It’s unlikely they are pitching the 220 to DL or JB. Can’t imagine SWA or Alaska is interested either. It would be hard to believe that Airbus isn’t attempting to sell their latest and greatest to one of their best customers. Haven’t done the numbers yet but the combined NK/F9 fleet may become one of the world’s largest narrow bus operators? I believe Spirit already shut the door on the A220 in favor of the A319NEO but you never know…. |
If this merger happens, I wonder what will happen to the A319NEO order? Maybe it’s time to order another 100 A220s…. ;)
|
Originally Posted by David Puddy
(Post 3480698)
If this merger happens, I wonder what will happen to the A319NEO order? Maybe it’s time to order another 100 A220s…. ;)
https://i.ibb.co/mGpfQVW/6-B815-FED-...D495-D25-E.jpg https://i.ibb.co/1vK4Thh/F01-A2-B48-...82-AFB0755.jpg |
Originally Posted by David Puddy
(Post 3480698)
If this merger happens, I wonder what will happen to the A319NEO order? Maybe it’s time to order another 100 A220s…. ;)
But seriously, the magic of the 220 isn't the range, payload, or technology, it's the fuel burn. Airbus numbers with RJ fuel burns. The problem is it's probably not worth starting a new fleet type just for that, and Boeing is practically giving MAX's away with similar or better numbers. That's why we gave the CS100/A220 a serious look at allegiant but then went with the Boeing. Another notable issue is the training and maintenance. The C Series is an Airbus in name only. There's zero training or parts commonality with a real Airbus. May as well take a highly discounted MAX if you're in the market for a completely different fleet from what you already have. I think the only reason Delta has been successful with that jet is because they got them at a steep discount after the trade dispute, and used them to replace large RJs on long thin RJ routes. ULCCs don't have that kind of business model. |
Originally Posted by David Puddy
(Post 3480698)
If this merger happens, I wonder what will happen to the A319NEO order? Maybe it’s time to order another 100 A220s…. ;)
|
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3480741)
Internal pocket session from JB management to JB employees said NK is converting the 319NEO to 320NEOs.
Is the 12 extra seats worth it? |
Originally Posted by Bluetruth
(Post 3480760)
So for JB it would have been a 150 seater 319 or a 162 seater 320
Is the 12 extra seats worth it? |
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3480765)
The 319 isn't a 150 seat airplane in JB seating configuration. More like 132-138.
|
Originally Posted by Bluetruth
(Post 3480769)
Why in the world keep the 220 then? Dump it and go all airbus.
|
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3480774)
The A220 averages a burn of 1,400lbs less per hour than a 320NEO. At JB utilization levels it burns about 3,000 gallons less per plane, per day.
|
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3480774)
The A220 averages a burn of 1,400lbs less per hour than a 320NEO. At JB utilization levels it burns about 3,000 gallons less per plane, per day.
At a nominal $3 per gallon you are carrying 50% more passengers on every trip for an incremental cost of $9000 per day. https://i.ibb.co/wJYDXvc/AE4728-AE-5...-AE66-E235.jpg Given the fixed costs of a second fleet in training, sims, parts and maintenance logistics, I’m not sure a $9000 a day fuel savings actually justifies the second type and outside of one FA, there are really no personnel savings. Well, a couple bucks an hour on the A220 vs A320 pilot rate I guess. I suppose you could make the case for ONLY flying the A220, but any airline having a fleet of 300 or so of those is well in the future whereas NK and B6 both have an order book of 320 variants lined up and a sunk investment in existing spares and training. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3480779)
Carrying 50% fewer passengers.
|
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3480794)
Where are you getting 50% fewer passengers? B6 A320s carry 162 and their A220s carry 140.
https://i.ibb.co/GvmRLhq/1-E4-DCB28-...8-C99-EFE7.jpg But yeah, if it’s 220-300s it’s a comparable load to a 319. Still don’t know if it’s worth the training and logistics costs of going two fleet though. And again, nobody is going to have a huge fleet of A220s any time soon. |
Now do the A319NEO. Who is going to have huge fleets of those?
Arguments like this is why people believe pilots are stupid. |
Originally Posted by povertyeagle
(Post 3480867)
Now do the A319NEO. Who is going to have huge fleets of those?
Arguments like this is why people believe pilots are stupid. 2. What’s the parts, maintenance, and training commonality between the A220 and the BULK of the JetBlue fleet which IS A320s, and will be even moreso 320 series if/when they complete the acquisition of NK? 3. And, as I said, the 319NEO orders are convertible to 320NEOs easily enough at this stage. Arguments like yours are why management believes pilots know nothing about running an airline. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3480872)
Arguments like yours are why management believes pilots know nothing about running an airline.
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3480819)
Airbus Company literature:
https://i.ibb.co/GvmRLhq/1-E4-DCB28-...8-C99-EFE7.jpg But yeah, if it’s 220-300s it’s a comparable load to a 319. Still don’t know if it’s worth the training and logistics costs of going two fleet though. And again, nobody is going to have a huge fleet of A220s any time soon. As someone who has also flown on the JB A220 as a pax several times, I can personally vouch for it from the passenger ergonomics standpoint. Much better than any current Spirit offering and more comfortable than any non-MINT JB product. Perhaps JB will get more 220s through a possible future Breeze merger… |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3480872)
1. What’s the parts, maintenance, and training commonality between the 319 and the rest of the 320 series?
2. What’s the parts, maintenance, and training commonality between the A220 and the BULK of the JetBlue fleet which IS A320s, and will be even moreso 320 series if/when they complete the acquisition of NK? 3. And, as I said, the 319NEO orders are convertible to 320NEOs easily enough at this stage. Arguments like yours are why management believes pilots know nothing about running an airline. But I also think you fail to look just a little further into the future, with the inevitable launch of the A220-500, which will have been economics than the A320NEO with similar capacity. With a future fleet of 600+ aircraft, they can have two fleet types if they want, and probably works out better for some/much of the pilot group to spread out seniority a little bit. |
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3481094)
I will just add that JB already has an A220-300 program up and running. That horse is already out of the barn. The A220-300 does have better economics than an A319NEO, and there may be many routes that don't need the capacity of an A320NEO.
But I also think you fail to look just a little further into the future, with the inevitable launch of the A220-500, which will have been economics than the A320NEO with similar capacity. With a future fleet of 600+ aircraft, they can have two fleet types if they want, and probably works out better for some/much of the pilot group to spread out seniority a little bit. The A220-500 will be a workhorse and no doubt we see it replace a lot of our current A320ceo capacity. The most economical variant of any given airframe is the one that holds the most pax. A321 vs A319, A220-500 vs A220-100 |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3481104)
I struggle to see a role for the A319 in the fleet 3-5yrs post merger. I would be very very surprised if the 319neo was ever delivered to NK/JB.
The A220-500 will be a workhorse and no doubt we see it replace a lot of our current A320ceo capacity. The most economical variant of any given airframe is the one that holds the most pax. A321 vs A319, A220-500 vs A220-100 |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3481104)
I struggle to see a role for the A319 in the fleet 3-5yrs post merger. I would be very very surprised if the 319neo was ever delivered to NK/JB.
The A220-500 will be a workhorse and no doubt we see it replace a lot of our current A320ceo capacity. The most economical variant of any given airframe is the one that holds the most pax. A321 vs A319, A220-500 vs A220-100 Yep. The future of JetBlue is eventually an all 220(multiple variants) and 321 airline. It’s gonna take a while but that is the way we are headed. Especially if the 220-500 comes along soon. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
(Post 3481152)
Yep.
The future of JetBlue is eventually an all 220(multiple variants) and 321 airline. It’s gonna take a while but that is the way we are headed. Especially if the 220-500 comes along soon. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3481104)
I struggle to see a role for the A319 in the fleet 3-5yrs post merger. I would be very very surprised if the 319neo was ever delivered to NK/JB.
The A220-500 will be a workhorse and no doubt we see it replace a lot of our current A320ceo capacity. The most economical variant of any given airframe is the one that holds the most pax. A321 vs A319, A220-500 vs A220-100 My crystal ball says AA will change their minds in a few years. They will want A220s, for several reasons, not the least of which is many of their A319s are getting old. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3481484)
I wonder if AA will buy up all of these used A319. They have stated they don’t want any A220. After all, they have A319s.
My crystal ball says AA will change their minds in a few years. They will want A220s, for several reasons, not the least of which is many of their A319s are getting old. |
https://ir.spirit.com/resources/fleet-plan/default.aspx
Stating the obvious to some of you here. Spirit has always said that any of the 320 series orders can be executed as 319 or 320 or 321, but as of now the fleet plan specifically shows only 320neo and 321neo orders. I don't recall ever seeing any specific 319neos in the fleet plan. The 319s are getting a little long in the tooth, but I flew a 319 and a 320 yesterday and the 320 was a pig and the 319 was a peach. Another tidbit, a few years ago United was scrounging for second hand 319s and picked up a bunch from China. The Spirit 319s were also slated to head to United, but it never happened. |
https://i.ibb.co/rwnmXkT/4-F35-DE77-...AA6644-DF5.jpg
Airbus too is having supply chain problems affecting their deliveries which are currently running about 90% of their nominal capacity. The 320 series still massively dominates their order book and current deliveries. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands