![]() |
Spirit contract negotiation history question
Please correct me if I'm wrong on my history but my understanding is that in 2018 Spirit management attempted to negotiate directly with the pilots by sending a summary of the offer directly to their homes.
This didn't work and the Spirit pilots ended up going on strike. My question is: Was this worth it? How much was gained by holding out vs the pay lost those months that the pilots remained at the lower pay rates? Thanks in advance |
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3572006)
Please correct me if I'm wrong on my history but my understanding is that in 2018 Spirit management attempted to negotiate directly with the pilots by sending a summary of the offer directly to their homes.
This didn't work and the Spirit pilots ended up going on strike. My question is: Was this worth it? How much was gained by holding out vs the pay lost those months that the pilots remained at the lower pay rates? Thanks in advance No, we did not strike, we weren’t released for self help, weren’t even close. 2010 was when Spirit pilots were released to strike We gained in just about every area with the CBA we got in 2018 vs what management offered us directly. But the moral of the story is your Union should speak for you. If they aren’t, there are steps. Management should never feel like they are able to circumvent the collective bargaining process. We have a union, management must go through them, and not this amateur hour crap. Oh and there will be a few bitter ass Spirit pilots who voted No in 2018 and 2023 (30% minority) who will say we should have taken Bendos offer or something. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3572032)
Yes, they sent the same Allegiant style packages to our house. Many of us “return to sender” the packages
No, we did not strike, we weren’t released for self help, weren’t even close. 2010 was when Spirit pilots were released to strike We gained in just about every area with the CBA we got in 2018 vs what management offered us directly. But the moral of the story is your Union should speak for you. If they aren’t, there are steps. Management should never feel like they are able to circumvent the collective bargaining process. We have a union, management must go through them, and not this amateur hour crap. Oh and there will be a few bitter ass Spirit pilots who voted No in 2018 and 2023 (30% minority) who will say we should have taken Bendos offer or something. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3572032)
Yes, they sent the same Allegiant style packages to our house. Many of us “return to sender” the packages
No, we did not strike, we weren’t released for self help, weren’t even close. 2010 was when Spirit pilots were released to strike We gained in just about every area with the CBA we got in 2018 vs what management offered us directly. But the moral of the story is your Union should speak for you. If they aren’t, there are steps. Management should never feel like they are able to circumvent the collective bargaining process. We have a union, management must go through them, and not this amateur hour crap. Oh and there will be a few bitter ass Spirit pilots who voted No in 2018 and 2023 (30% minority) who will say we should have taken Bendos offer or something. |
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3572091)
Thanks, there hasn't been a lot of pressure from pilots to vote on the offer, but it's good to hear how that shook out for Spirit, as it seems like a pretty identical negotiating strategy from Allegiant management.
|
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3572091)
Thanks, there hasn't been a lot of pressure from pilots to vote on the offer, but it's good to hear how that shook out for Spirit, as it seems like a pretty identical negotiating strategy from Allegiant management.
And your union speaks for you, so no need to anything else than to send it unopened back to the company. |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 3572034)
I don’t think there are any no voters that would argue we should have taken the deal on the mailer in 2018. That doesn’t even make any sense.
l l l l V
Originally Posted by 8JRMfortheyear
(Post 3566520)
Yup the same proposal that ALPA told us to send back and ended up getting the same rate 2 years later lol.
|
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3572091)
Thanks, there hasn't been a lot of pressure from pilots to vote on the offer, but it's good to hear how that shook out for Spirit, as it seems like a pretty identical negotiating strategy from Allegiant management.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3572126)
Yet we still have guys who post the following, thinking it was the same as we were sent.
l l l l V |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3572126)
Yet we still have guys who post the following, thinking it was the same as we were sent.
l l l l V SAME Rate…but keep on. 40 below industry, pathetic and embarrassing and still is. |
Originally Posted by BKbigfish
(Post 3572204)
Right… so why would they be in favor of the deal that they ended up voting no on if they seriously thought there were no changes made? If your point is that we have some uninformed voters of course. We also have Yes voters this time around who apparently thought our monthly guarantee changed to 78 hrs because that’s the average the union used to sell the TA.
cinco is a alpa cheerleader. Also, don’t forget 2018 TA when the company tried to sue alpa. Talk about selling the TA ! Two separate ordeals not one but you know what? I have faith in my union. |
Originally Posted by Squeakygreaser
(Post 3572006)
Please correct me if I'm wrong on my history but my understanding is that in 2018 Spirit management attempted to negotiate directly with the pilots by sending a summary of the offer directly to their homes.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3572126)
Yet we still have guys who post the following, thinking it was the same as we were sent.
l l l l V edit-Of course a TA 2018 no voter would’ve voted no to JBs “offer”. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 3581384)
Do you still have the mailer? I don’t but I sure as spit remember very little difference between that and the eventual TA. 22 hr duty day trigger was changed. For worse.
edit-Of course a TA 2018 no voter would’ve voted no to JBs “offer”. :rolleyes: Honestly, does it matter? I can send a mailer to everyone in the C suite that I will take DL rates in exchange for waiving the commute policy. IF IT IS NOT THROUGH THE UNION IT MEANS $#!T. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3581388)
Honestly, does it matter? I can send a mailer to everyone in the C suite that I will take DL rates in exchange for waiving the commute policy. IF IT IS NOT THROUGH THE UNION IT MEANS $#!T.
|
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 3581431)
Unless you’re on the NC that’s nowhere near a good rebuttal. It was presented as being the latest offer to the union. My question was what changed between then and the TA?
|
Originally Posted by lowandslow
(Post 3581431)
Unless you’re on the NC that’s nowhere near a good rebuttal. It was presented as being the latest offer to the union. My question was what changed between then and the TA?
Also, 401k DC overages after IRS max was met. Another biggie. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands