![]() |
Originally Posted by checkgear
(Post 3903603)
Pretty sure he got furloughed so be nice lol
|
Originally Posted by Lincoln Osiris
(Post 3903654)
And he failed his Spirit new hire check ride so he really is in dire need of daddy Spirt lol.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3901659)
Horrible leader, horrible manager, and wish this happened years earlier.
Wish you the absolute worst Ted. |
What is the info on the new exec? Anything good or bad?
|
Originally Posted by reeeeeeegional
(Post 3909072)
What is the info on the new exec? Anything good or bad?
|
Did anyone expect anything different?
|
Originally Posted by reeeeeeegional
(Post 3909072)
What is the info on the new exec? Anything good or bad?
|
Originally Posted by CatPilot1
(Post 3909166)
His only purpose is to stabilize the accounting for a sale, not get to know anyone or any group. He’s a place holder.
This is the equivalent of not naming your baby cow on the farm, you know one day you’ll take it to slaughter. I hate to say it, but fear this is the case. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 3909257)
Haha. You sure about that?
This is the equivalent of not naming your baby cow on the farm, you know one day you’ll take it to slaughter. I hate to say it, but fear this is the case. I do understand where you’re coming from, I obviously pray that’s not the case. I do think it’s interesting BB said he will not be commenting on M&A. Normally when nothing is in the works, they just say so. Whether or not a deal is reached, you can rest assure they are at the very least talking behind closed doors. |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3909280)
I’d agree with you if Dave’s history showed anything of the sort, but it’s suggests otherwise. Who am I to go against giants like Doug Parker and actual industry analysts all saying this is a set up for a merger.
I do understand where you’re coming from, I obviously pray that’s not the case. I do think it’s interesting BB said he will not be commenting on M&A. Normally when nothing is in the works, they just say so. Whether or not a deal is reached, you can rest assure they are at the very least talking behind closed doors. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3909295)
Oh c'mon man seriously, what would Doug Parker know about airline mergers?
filler |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3909280)
I’d agree with you if Dave’s history showed anything of the sort, but it’s suggests otherwise. Who am I to go against giants like Doug Parker and actual industry analysts all saying this is a set up for a merger.
I do understand where you’re coming from, I obviously pray that’s not the case. I do think it’s interesting BB said he will not be commenting on M&A. Normally when nothing is in the works, they just say so. Whether or not a deal is reached, you can rest assure they are at the very least talking behind closed doors. long term viability for both pilot groups is much better together then separate. |
Originally Posted by SSlow
(Post 3909295)
Oh c'mon man seriously, what would Doug Parker know about airline mergers?
|
Originally Posted by redhot
(Post 3909407)
as much as anyone does not want it to happen, it has to happen. The industry materially changed over COVID and the USA does not have the appetite for two ULCC’s. I think a new airline of that scale can make some changes to customer service along with experience. My hope would be to offer actual lower fares while treating people well. I like to think about what Southwest was 15 years ago. That combined company could do just that.
long term viability for both pilot groups is much better together then separate. |
Is the general idea then that he is temporary? Does he know what he's doing - any idea what his leadership style is or what can be expected here?
|
Originally Posted by reeeeeeegional
(Post 3909445)
Is the general idea then that he is temporary? Does he know what he's doing - any idea what his leadership style is or what can be expected here?
|
Originally Posted by Born2FlyAv8R
(Post 3909472)
why don’t you do some research on him and look him up? See what he’s done in the past, who he’s done it for, and how those companies faired.
|
Originally Posted by LongHornFlyer
(Post 3909475)
Never understood why people do this. What’s the point of a forum? He’s asking Spirit pilot’s opinions about this guy…where is he supposed to find that on the google machine?
|
I think it’s only fair to ask how many scoops and what flavor…. 😬
|
Originally Posted by redhot
(Post 3909407)
as much as anyone does not want it to happen, it has to happen. The industry materially changed over COVID and the USA does not have the appetite for two ULCC’s. I think a new airline of that scale can make some changes to customer service along with experience. My hope would be to offer actual lower fares while treating people well. I like to think about what Southwest was 15 years ago. That combined company could do just that.
long term viability for both pilot groups is much better together then separate. Delta makes its money through credit cards, cargo, MRO services, training services, oil wells, premium/business, upgrades, intl. travel, lounges, on top of all the other ancillary fees (bags, Wi-Fi, drinks, etc.). They also have a large regional network of 50-70 seat rjs that allow them to maintain routes and markets year round, while the ULCCs have to move in and out of markets because they can’t fill a 321 neo during the offseason. They probably run those RJs at a loss, hence why they have a much larger CASM. Again, they don’t care about moving pax. doublign in size by over paying for a bankrupt company, bloated with debt, while waving a bear paw, and telling pax how much you love them isn’t the panacea you think it is. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3909522)
it’s not about doubling in size. The ULCCs are the only airlines trying to make money through moving economy passengers. That’s why Barry is always droning on about CASM this, CASM that, .08¢ CASM, blah blah blah. The legacies have figured out moving pax is a side show. It’s a losers game.
Delta makes its money through credit cards, cargo, MRO services, training services, oil wells, premium/business, upgrades, intl. travel, lounges, on top of all the other ancillary fees (bags, Wi-Fi, drinks, etc.). They also have a large regional network of 50-70 seat rjs that allow them to maintain routes and markets year round, while the ULCCs have to move in and out of markets because they can’t fill a 321 neo during the offseason. They probably run those RJs at a loss, hence why they have a much larger CASM. Again, they don’t care about moving pax. doublign in size by over paying for a bankrupt company, bloated with debt, while waving a bear paw, and telling pax how much you love them isn’t the panacea you think it is. doubling the size = a larger network and way better CC revenue. Why do you think frontier is so heavily invested in building loyalty right now. They know there’s no money in the actual fair, thus why we are getting a new app, first class, and completely redone loyalty program. It’s all about building a product that stimulates Credit cards. If you go back and listen to earnings calls/investor summits then you will hear him say having a larger airline needs to occur along with partners around the world to make people buy into your airline CC. if frontier would have overpaid for spirit they would have moved forward during bankruptcy and bought spirit then. they were cost disciplined and rejected the counter proposal. Everyone can talk smack about indigo but they are not bad investors. End of story, this business is all about scale. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3909522)
it’s not about doubling in size. The ULCCs are the only airlines trying to make money through moving economy passengers. That’s why Barry is always droning on about CASM this, CASM that, .08¢ CASM, blah blah blah. The legacies have figured out moving pax is a side show. It’s a losers game.
Delta makes its money through credit cards, cargo, MRO services, training services, oil wells, premium/business, upgrades, intl. travel, lounges, on top of all the other ancillary fees (bags, Wi-Fi, drinks, etc.). They also have a large regional network of 50-70 seat rjs that allow them to maintain routes and markets year round, while the ULCCs have to move in and out of markets because they can’t fill a 321 neo during the offseason. They probably run those RJs at a loss, hence why they have a much larger CASM. Again, they don’t care about moving pax. doublign in size by over paying for a bankrupt company, bloated with debt, while waving a bear paw, and telling pax how much you love them isn’t the panacea you think it is. |
Originally Posted by redhot
(Post 3909550)
doubling the size = a larger network and way better CC revenue. Why do you think frontier is so heavily invested in building loyalty right now. They know there’s no money in the actual fair, thus why we are getting a new app, first class, and completely redone loyalty program. It’s all about building a product that stimulates Credit cards.
If you go back and listen to earnings calls/investor summits then you will hear him say having a larger airline needs to occur along with partners around the world to make people buy into your airline CC. if frontier would have overpaid for spirit they would have moved forward during bankruptcy and bought spirit then. they were cost disciplined and rejected the counter proposal. Everyone can talk smack about indigo but they are not bad investors. End of story, this business is all about scale. You throwing more 240 seat planes on unprofitable routes after over paying for a company that comes with a ton of debt, and no new markets, is what I have a problem with. Planes need to go places, on profitable routes, with sufficient frequency to attract the credit card customers you speak of. This is especially true for the ULCCs, which as I said before, still makes their money primarily from moving pax. We also have the unfortunate luxury of trying to find undiscovered routes or trying to break into heavily fortified routes. We also have to figure out these routes based on a 190seat or 230/240 seat aircraft. We don’t get the luxury of adjusting aircraft when demand fluctuates. When was the last time F9 chased a competitor from a route? Or has it been the other way around? My memory tells me it’s been the latter. Basic rules of economy and supply and demand doesn’t change just by multiplying by x2. |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3909565)
oh god shut up this industry is all about scale even idiots know this. Merge the dang airlines and we’ll figure the rest out later.
quit and go to American. Figure the rest out later. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3909574)
you shut up. TC ran your Mickey Mouse operation into the ground and now you’re desperate for F9 to white knight and save your seniority progression. And you’ll fear monger anyone in your way to get it.
quit and go to American. Figure the rest out later. |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3909575)
I bet you’re the angry little fat boy with the sparse mustache that nobody wants to fly with
When I see her at Play It Again Sam she always acts like she knows me. Even tho she gets my name wrong every time. It’s cool though. I don’t like commitments. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3909577)
Nope. But I’m def the guy stuffing dollar bills down your mom’s g string
When I see her at Play It Again Sam she always acts like she knows me. Even tho she gets my name wrong every time. It’s cool though. I don’t like commitments. cheers |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3909578)
You and I will both die in ULCC hell.
cheers |
Why we didn’t partner with Bilt I’ll never understand. Alaska/Hawaii did.
they process something like over 25% of renters payments in the US. |
|
Originally Posted by redhot
(Post 3909550)
End of story, this business is all about scale.
Spirit had 88 planes in 2016 and made $264M Spirit had 112 planes in 2017 and made $420M Spirit had 128 planes in 2018 and made $155M Spirit had 145 planes in 2019 and made $335M Spirit had 213 planes in 2024 and lost $1.23B If Spirit's problem is scale then why was it profitable when it was smaller and losing money now that is has scale? American has scale and it lost money in Q1. Southwest has scale and lost $465M in 2024. The problem is that Spirit isn't offering a product people want to pay enough for to cover its costs. It has nothing to do with scale nor credit cards. Spirit was profitable in the past without either of those. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3910921)
Spirit had 79 planes in 2015 and made $317M
Spirit had 88 planes in 2016 and made $264M Spirit had 112 planes in 2017 and made $420M Spirit had 128 planes in 2018 and made $155M Spirit had 145 planes in 2019 and made $335M Spirit had 213 planes in 2024 and lost $1.23B If Spirit's problem is scale then why was it profitable when it was smaller and losing money now that is has scale? American has scale and it lost money in Q1. Southwest has scale and lost $465M in 2024. The problem is that Spirit isn't offering a product people want to pay enough for to cover its costs. It has nothing to do with scale nor credit cards. Spirit was profitable in the past without either of those. Furthermore, the attractiveness of the credit card (and thus its value to the company) is tied to the airline’s scale. What good are points if all I can use them for is a twice-weekly redeye to MCO? People want cards that enable them to actually go places. You need scale for that. Fact is, the airline graveyard is full of small carriers who tried to offer a nice product without network/scale. You can offer me all the niceties in the world but if I can’t count on going where I want to go (direct) and when I want to go, I’ll choose the other guy. |
Originally Posted by BobSacamano
(Post 3910966)
You can’t say “the problem is that Spirit isn't offering a product people want to pay enough for” and simultaneously deny that ULCCs have a scale problem. People will pay more for a larger network: business travelers and others with the sort of discretionary income that can fund Spirit’s higher-than-2015 costs require frequency and the operational resilience that comes with a larger operation.
Furthermore, the attractiveness of the credit card (and thus its value to the company) is tied to the airline’s scale. What good are points if all I can use them for is a twice-weekly redeye to MCO? People want cards that enable them to actually go places. You need scale for that. Fact is, the airline graveyard is full of small carriers who tried to offer a nice product without network/scale. You can offer me all the niceties in the world but if I can’t count on going where I want to go (direct) and when I want to go, I’ll choose the other guy. |
Originally Posted by BobSacamano
(Post 3910966)
You can’t say “the problem is that Spirit isn't offering a product people want to pay enough for” and simultaneously deny that ULCCs have a scale problem. People will pay more for a larger network: business travelers and others with the sort of discretionary income that can fund Spirit’s higher-than-2015 costs require frequency and the operational resilience that comes with a larger operation.
Furthermore, the attractiveness of the credit card (and thus its value to the company) is tied to the airline’s scale. What good are points if all I can use them for is a twice-weekly redeye to MCO? People want cards that enable them to actually go places. You need scale for that. Fact is, the airline graveyard is full of small carriers who tried to offer a nice product without network/scale. You can offer me all the niceties in the world but if I can’t count on going where I want to go (direct) and when I want to go, I’ll choose the other guy. BUT he does have a point. Scale without a plan just wastes money; however, if we accomplish scale by eliminating a competitor via a merger (I.e. F9 or any ULCC), then it has merit. |
Originally Posted by loudclouds
(Post 3911022)
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, friendlypilot hates every airline aside from United.
BUT he does have a point. Scale without a plan just wastes money; however, if we accomplish scale by eliminating a competitor via a merger (I.e. F9 or any ULCC), then it has merit. But anyone who thinks just being bigger solves all the problems, or their existing problems magically go away, is foolish. |
Originally Posted by LinaPeru
(Post 3911027)
scale has merit because it gives you a firmer seat at the table.
But anyone who thinks just being bigger solves all the problems, or their existing problems magically go away, is foolish. |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3910921)
Spirit had 79 planes in 2015 and made $317M
Spirit had 88 planes in 2016 and made $264M Spirit had 112 planes in 2017 and made $420M Spirit had 128 planes in 2018 and made $155M Spirit had 145 planes in 2019 and made $335M Spirit had 213 planes in 2024 and lost $1.23B If Spirit's problem is scale then why was it profitable when it was smaller and losing money now that is has scale? American has scale and it lost money in Q1. Southwest has scale and lost $465M in 2024. The problem is that Spirit isn't offering a product people want to pay enough for to cover its costs. It has nothing to do with scale nor credit cards. Spirit was profitable in the past without either of those. “Da Plane, Da Plane!” Aren’t “planes” for carpenters? |
Spirit was profitable when they were smaller, because they focused their resources on passenger dense routes to vacation and leisure travel destinations. Aircraft utilization was significantly better prior to Ted's attempt to improve on-time performance by inflating block times and adding longer turn times. They strayed too far from their core operating principles.
|
Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
(Post 3911180)
Spirit was profitable when they were smaller, because they focused their resources on passenger dense routes to vacation and leisure travel destinations. Aircraft utilization was significantly better prior to Ted's attempt to improve on-time performance by inflating block times and adding longer turn times. They strayed too far from their core operating principles.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands