Search
Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2013, 05:07 AM
  #5301  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Seems like every other day Mötley Fool has an article on Spirit

Is Spirit Air Worth the Water?

Is Spirit Air Worth the Water?

Airlines have long been considered a no-man's land for investors, yet in recent years some have thrived. With the ongoing consolidation of the airline industry, each individual company has the ability to carve out a potentially profitable niche that defies the notion that airlines are unprofitable, undesirable businesses. For this value-oriented sky-flier that released earnings last week, 2012 was a very strong year. Now, with rising fuel costs, legacy-led pricing power, and increasing ancillary fees, how does the forecast look for the this year and beyond?

Flyin' high
According to Spirit Airlines (NASDAQ: SAVE ) , 2012 was a successful year of recovery for the travel industry. The company added 29 new routes to its portfolio, bringing its total number to 110. Those moves helped Spirit achieve a record full-year income of $1.3 billion -- all while maintaining its low average base fare of $75. More impressive is that this came in on the heels of a difficult quarter for the company. Hurricane Sandy hit the industry hard, and Spirit management believes the catastrophe brought down revenue by $25 million and operating income by $24 million.

That $1.3 billion in revenue represents a more than 21% jump over the prior year's numbers. The company had 12.2% operating margins, again affected by Hurricane Sandy -- it otherwise would have probably been closer to 14%, in line with last year's figure.

For the quarter, the company was able to beat the Street's expectations. EPS for the fourth quarter came in $0.03 ahead of estimates at $0.27 per share, based on $328.3 million in revenue. Sales came in at a 20% premium to 2011's fourth quarter and, again, above Wall Street estimates of $324.7 million.

Overall, things appear strong for the discount airliner that offers bottom-line prices for bottom-line service. But how does that model play out long-term, and what other factors could change Spirit's course?

Is it really that cheap?
There's no doubt that Spirit is one of the cheapest airlines, if not the cheapest, on a routine basis. Allegiant Travel (NASDAQ: ALGT ) is most similar in price point and route offering, but it also has a robust travel booking service beyond its core airline business. Though, as my colleague Brian Stoffel pointed out, ancillary fees quickly diminish Spirit's seemingly advantageous cost platform. Now, all airlines are charging more and more ancillaries, but Spirit seems to be taking the idea of nickel-and-diming to a new low. Charging $3 for water doesn't seem like a reasonable thing to do, regardless of increasing fuel prices or competition from other airlines. I usually bring my own water on planes, but this offends me on a fundamental level.

Will travelers be as put off as I am by that kind of behavior? The company is expanding quickly, so growth looks strong -- but it will be interesting to see how its new routes perform on a long-term basis and if initial traveler interest wanes.

Rising fuel costs are another element that could change things for Spirit this year. Airlines can typically compensate by raising fares. Spirit can do this to a degree, but with its other practices (again, see $3 water), it's only selling point is dirt-cheap airfares. If it were to increase fares by just $10 or $15, it might have to let us bring a carry-on for free.

Tailwinds and the call
Beyond my personal issues with Spirit's business model, there do seem to be some outside factors that bode well for the company going forward. As mentioned in a recent interview on CNBC, Spirit CEO Ben Baldanza believes the merger between American Airlines (NASDAQOTH: AAMRQ ) and US Air (NYSE: LCC ) will increase prices for legacy carriers and widen the gap between discount airlines and the others, thus creating a bigger runway for growth.

From my understanding of the merger, this could happen, but it's not a guarantee. Both American and US Air reps have said multiple times that this does not necessarily equal an increase in fares, though analysts have often disagreed. Assuming Baldanza is correct, though, passengers may be more inclined than ever to try out Spirit and its Evian-priced tap water.

In a recent article, I touted Alaska Airlines as the airline to go with if you're intrigued by the "renaissance" period of airlines and want to invest. I like Alaska's doubleheader of growing routes while earning more per seat per mile, its profitable West Coast niche, and, most importantly, its free water.
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:24 AM
  #5302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
Default

I hadn't seen that article yet. Where do they find these guys?
Lobaeux is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:34 AM
  #5303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 549
Default

Originally Posted by Lobaeux View Post
I hadn't seen that article yet. Where do they find these guys?
Suburban basements of their parents' homes.
gatorbird is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:34 AM
  #5304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by Lobaeux View Post
I hadn't seen that article yet. Where do they find these guys?
Are you talking about Baldanza?
Columbia is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:38 AM
  #5305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BillyBaroo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: A320 F.O.
Posts: 176
Default

"Charging $3 for water doesn't seem like a reasonable thing to do, regardless of increasing fuel prices or competition from other airlines. I usually bring my own water on planes, but this offends me on a fundamental level."

Wow. If your offended by that, then really--hole yourself up in a closet. These so called "bloggers" post excoriating reviews about having to pay for bottled water on an aircraft. Is it an entitlement? Of course, they are probably from the generation where everyone gets a trophy mentality. I fail to see any of these bloggers compalin about the cost of ammenities like bottled water at a sporting event. Try going to a NFL or NBA game and telling the concession stand "I paid good money for this ticket, I deserve a free bottle of water." I went to the Ryder Cup last year and paid well over that for a bottle of water.
BillyBaroo is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:41 AM
  #5306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BillyBaroo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: A320 F.O.
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia View Post
Are you talking about Baldanza?
I thinks he's talking about the writer, Michael Lewis.
BillyBaroo is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:44 AM
  #5307  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia View Post
Are you talking about Baldanza?
No, Baldanza is the CEO of Spirit, not an amateur writer for an investment hobbyist website.
Now, I kinda knock the Fool website, but I read it and visit the site often, I just don't use it as a primary investment source.
Lobaeux is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:57 AM
  #5308  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Default

Originally Posted by BillyBaroo View Post
"Charging $3 for water doesn't seem like a reasonable thing to do, regardless of increasing fuel prices or competition from other airlines. I usually bring my own water on planes, but this offends me on a fundamental level."

Wow. If your offended by that, then really--hole yourself up in a closet. These so called "bloggers" post excoriating reviews about having to pay for bottled water on an aircraft. Is it an entitlement? Of course, they are probably from the generation where everyone gets a trophy mentality. I fail to see any of these bloggers compalin about the cost of ammenities like bottled water at a sporting event. Try going to a NFL or NBA game and telling the concession stand "I paid good money for this ticket, I deserve a free bottle of water." I went to the Ryder Cup last year and paid well over that for a bottle of water.
3 beans for a bottle of water is one thing. 3 bucks for pouring it out of the tap is another.
Columbia is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 07:04 AM
  #5309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Airplane
Posts: 2,385
Default

Originally Posted by BillyBaroo View Post
"Charging $3 for water doesn't seem like a reasonable thing to do, regardless of increasing fuel prices or competition from other airlines. I usually bring my own water on planes, but this offends me on a fundamental level."

Wow. If your offended by that, then really--hole yourself up in a closet. These so called "bloggers" post excoriating reviews about having to pay for bottled water on an aircraft. Is it an entitlement? Of course, they are probably from the generation where everyone gets a trophy mentality. I fail to see any of these bloggers compalin about the cost of ammenities like bottled water at a sporting event. Try going to a NFL or NBA game and telling the concession stand "I paid good money for this ticket, I deserve a free bottle of water." I went to the Ryder Cup last year and paid well over that for a bottle of water.
I have seen some railing against Spirit, as an airline amongst my group of friends or on Facebook.
ALL ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE WARNING: most of the people that I come into contact with that complain about Spirit, extra charges, extra fees, haven't actually flown on Spirit! How crazy is that?
Spirit doesn't serve my local airport, so most people I know around where I live haven't flown on the airline, yet they'll say how much it sucks because they add in extra fees and charges and such.
That's just my experience, others may vary.
Lobaeux is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 07:16 AM
  #5310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Columbia View Post
3 beans for a bottle of water is one thing. 3 bucks for pouring it out of the tap is another.
I agree except that Spirit sells bottled water not tap water so what exactly are you trying to say?
Merlyn is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices