Search
Notices

MQ to SY (Change My Mind)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2019, 06:16 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,261
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
The only advantage to having the type rating would be having a Company checkride vs. a type rating ride. And you wouldn't even get that until you upgraded at the major airline.
FO's pretty much all get the type rating today, to comply with ICAO. If you have the type is does provide a slight theoretical advantage as to how the checkride is conducted (more flexibility for re-training).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-19-2019, 01:16 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

Nobody should assume that going to Sun Country will result in an easy type rating. I spent a year there and the training was no joke. I have roots in the area and went there eyes wide open. So none of it caught me off guard. But it was a big pay cut for me leaving a 'quality regional' (oxymoron) and it is most definitely not commuter friendly. It's designed around living in base and there has been turmoil over a rumored distant base.

I'd only really recommend it if you have roots in the MSP area and plan to live there. Don't go there assuming you will skate through training because you won't. People bust rides, which nobody wants. It's likely that someone with significant 121 time won't struggle in training but it was an eye opener for me. Don't underestimate it.

If I were looking to leave Envoy I'd look at the other ULCCs first. They would appear to have a more solid future. Again, for people with no connection to the Twin Cities, Sun Country is a bit of an odd choice. For people with a connection, it's logical but ask around. I'm glad I spent a year there and I won't bad mouth the place, but I'm also glad I had the opportunity to move to a larger, more stable airline.
saab2000 is offline  
Old 10-21-2019, 05:07 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
JimWA77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Position: B-52 IP/EP
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000 View Post
Nobody should assume that going to Sun Country will result in an easy type rating. I spent a year there and the training was no joke. I have roots in the area and went there eyes wide open. So none of it caught me off guard. But it was a big pay cut for me leaving a 'quality regional' (oxymoron) and it is most definitely not commuter friendly. It's designed around living in base and there has been turmoil over a rumored distant base.

I'd only really recommend it if you have roots in the MSP area and plan to live there. Don't go there assuming you will skate through training because you won't. People bust rides, which nobody wants. It's likely that someone with significant 121 time won't struggle in training but it was an eye opener for me. Don't underestimate it.

If I were looking to leave Envoy I'd look at the other ULCCs first. They would appear to have a more solid future. Again, for people with no connection to the Twin Cities, Sun Country is a bit of an odd choice. For people with a connection, it's logical but ask around. I'm glad I spent a year there and I won't bad mouth the place, but I'm also glad I had the opportunity to move to a larger, more stable airline.
Concur about the training, it's well done, and definitely no joke. High data rate instruction, especially for a former 'pampered' AF driver in a jet built in the 60s. There has apparently been a few improvements in avionics in the last 50ish years... I'm just finishing OE now, and the LCAs are great! Professional, firm yet fair, all that typical pilot stuff.

As for the company itself, we have got some new management that seem like we're about to get after it in a good way. I am still happy to be here! However, I live in the Twin Cities, want nothing to do with commuting, and can't believe guys that do.
JimWA77 is offline  
Old 11-13-2019, 03:10 PM
  #14  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
All the majors want is Part 121 Turbine PIC time. Doesn't matter if its in a 737 or an E175. ...
This may be old news, but UA hires XJT and probably other regional flow partner FO's (no PIC) with 3,000 turbine time. My son was hired in June with just over 4,000 hours on the E145 acquired over 5.5 years with XJT.

(Why am I on the forum? I used to and will soon again fly a lot on SY, and a few years ago I tried to get my son to apply to fly for them.)
PilotPops is offline  
Old 11-15-2019, 08:42 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,416
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
FO's pretty much all get the type rating today, to comply with ICAO. If you have the type is does provide a slight theoretical advantage as to how the checkride is conducted (more flexibility for re-training).
pretty sure a PIC type is a 121 requirement for both pilots as of 2016
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigTuna607
PSA Airlines
6
02-13-2019 12:20 AM
urinmyseat
FedEx
7
09-25-2015 01:00 AM
maddogpyrat
Cargo
31
04-23-2015 12:23 PM
gtnbzy
Flight Schools and Training
18
08-03-2006 02:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices