Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
what is balanced field length? >

what is balanced field length?

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

what is balanced field length?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2007, 11:44 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
So Wonwee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 471
Default what is balanced field length?

This is a question that I found on aviationinterviews.net. What is balanced field length? I don't recall ever hearing this term. Is there another term used for this?
So Wonwee is offline  
Old 03-11-2007, 11:56 AM
  #2  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

The balance is basically that you can accelerate to V1 lose an engine and reject the takeoff and stop on the runway AT MAX GROSS WEIGHT.

At weights less than MAX you have excess runway available for stopping. The excess runway provides various options such as:

Optional V1
Cluttered V1
Reduced thrust takeoffs

A full discussion could easily fill a chapter of a book, but hopefully you get the concept.
HSLD is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 06:46 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: C-172 FO
Posts: 468
Default

I would add one thing by saying just what the co-founder said but balanced means that your gross weight is such that your stopping distance equals the runway available hence the word "balanced".
dutch747 is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 07:56 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

To expand the discussion, how long would it take to realize the actual loss of an engine. Balanced field probably assumes there is a specified amount of time needed to catch some gross anomaly, but how about the grayer kinds of areas. If you are watching TIT, torque and other meters and it vacillates rather than tanks how hard is it to decide?

There is a segment on youtube showing a goverment airliner somewhere in europe overrunning due to a sudden bird ingestion in one engine. It is clear in the video they were unsure what to do.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 08:11 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Chief Pilot
Posts: 52
Default

Balanced Field Length simply means that your accelerated stop distance is equal to your accelerated go distance. Most manufactures depict their tabulated takeoff data with the Balanced Field Length as this allows for the most takeoff weight with the least amount of runway.

There are two requirements for takeoff. (That is for a Jet)

Accelerated Stop Distance: The distance required to accelerate to V1, lose and engine, and abort.

Accelerated Go Distance: The distance required to accelerate to V1, loose an engine, accelerate to Vr, and climb at V2. The aircraft must cross the end of the runway at 35 feet.

Last edited by fly-efi; 03-12-2007 at 08:19 AM.
fly-efi is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 10:15 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
To expand the discussion, how long would it take to realize the actual loss of an engine. Balanced field probably assumes there is a specified amount of time needed to catch some gross anomaly, but how about the grayer kinds of areas. If you are watching TIT, torque and other meters and it vacillates rather than tanks how hard is it to decide?

There is a segment on youtube showing a goverment airliner somewhere in europe overrunning due to a sudden bird ingestion in one engine. It is clear in the video they were unsure what to do.

Balanced field assumes a total failure (not feathered, for a prop).

It also provides a few seconds to recognize symptoms, make the decision, and execute the abort. It's really pretty easy to recognize cuz a total failure will produce big yaw...I don't look for ITT abnormalities, if the thing heads for the grass prior to V1, I abort.

A partial failure would still provide thrust, so even if you didn't abort you could still probably go flying. Personally I would abort for any sort of drama involving controllability, vibration, or multiple engine indications, without a lot of analysis.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-12-2007, 12:20 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APM145's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 158
Default

The FAR takeoff field length, often called the FAR balanced field length, contains certain inherent safety features to account for engine failure situations. This takeoff field length is defined in several slightly different ways. Briefly, if an engine should fail during the takeoff roll at a critical speed, called the decision speed V1, the pilot is offered the option of two safe courses of action. He may elect to continue the takeoff on the remaining engines, in which case, the takeoff distance is defined as the distance from the point at which the takeoff run is initiated to the point where the aircraft has reached an altitude of 35 feet. In the second alternative, the pilot may elect to shut down all engines and apply full braking. The decision speed V1 is chosen in such a way that the sum of the distance required to accelerate to V1 and then decelerate to a stop is the same as the total distance for the case in which the takeoff is continued following engine failure. If an engine should fail before Vi is reached, the aircraft is usually brought to a stop on the runway; whereas, if an engine fails at a speed greater than V1 the takeoff is continued. The distances are based on smooth, hard, dry runway surfaces.


Good Luck

For more
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-468/app-h.htm
APM145 is offline  
Old 08-22-2007, 08:18 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
alvrb211's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,045
Default

The 35ft screen height applies to dry runways only !
For wet conditions, the screen height may be reduced to 15ft.
All that happens here is the 48ft obstacle clearance is reduced.

AL
alvrb211 is offline  
Old 09-01-2007, 09:06 PM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Borat Sagdiyev's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Balanced field assumes a total failure (not feathered, for a prop).
Actually, if the airplane is equipped with an autofeather system, the applicant (usually meaning the aircraft manufacturer) can take a performance credit for a feathered prop as opposed to a windmilling one. I have flown a couple of turboprops that would probably not make their second stage climb gradients unless the propeller was feathered shortly after an engine failure.

Happy time!!
Borat Sagdiyev is offline  
Old 09-02-2007, 12:45 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryguy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B777 FO
Posts: 416
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
. If you are watching TIT, torque and other meters and it vacillates rather than tanks how hard is it to decide?
I'm quite certain if I am watching TIT, then I could care less about airplanes at that moment!
ryguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
30
07-22-2007 08:36 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
9
12-13-2006 01:27 PM
AUS_ATC
Technical
9
12-13-2006 01:27 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices