Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Crosswind Landings in a Swept Wing jet >

Crosswind Landings in a Swept Wing jet

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Crosswind Landings in a Swept Wing jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2018, 03:58 PM
  #41  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Paladin145 View Post
2013: ASA: Incident: Atlantic Southeast CRJ2 at Charleston on Apr 5th 2013, wing tip strike on landing
2014: Express Jet: Incident: Expressjet CRJ2 at Atlanta on Jul 16th 2014, wing tip strike on landing
2015: Air Wisconsin: Incident: Wisconsin CRJ2 at Manchester on Mar 18th 2015, wing tip strike on landing
2017: Express Jet: Incident: Expressjet CRJ2 at Roanoke on Jan 22nd 2017, wing tip strike on landing

In my sim, only did 12 knots crosswind. No gusts. ( not sure if sim can do that.)

No mention of :

- fast roll rate of CRJ-200, and possibility to overcorrect in gusts.
- how much bank is needed with 0' crab, and max crosswind. ( what is your margin for error ? )
- Amount of crab ' that is acceptable on main gear to protect the wingtips.

No ground school on this topic. At least several wing tip strikes should have been reviewed and studied.
You can always find a few examples, that doesn't mean it's a problem. The 700 is far more notorious than the 200.

The 200 is very nimble and responsive, it only has a fast roll rate if you ask for it.

If you do it right, you don't need that much bank even at max xwind. The plane weighs over 20 tons, it has inertia... it does not instantly drift down wind at the full speed of the xwind component. If you plant a main as you decrab and roll in a little bank, that will solve most of your drift problem. If you float in ground effect, then yeah you're going to need more bank.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-26-2018, 04:59 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 78
Default Needs to be an emphasis item in sim, IOE

Rickair,

Good points. It can do fine in crosswinds, if pilots are taught properly. Only one check airman told me " if you flare too much, crosswinds will eat you up in this airplane." He said to get it on the ground. Other LCA's insisted on wing low, with a soft landing.

I read that the roll rate is very fast for a PAX aircraft, but I can't find the roll rate written anywhere.


Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
You can always find a few examples, that doesn't mean it's a problem. The 700 is far more notorious than the 200.

The 200 is very nimble and responsive, it only has a fast roll rate if you ask for it.

If you do it right, you don't need that much bank even at max xwind. The plane weighs over 20 tons, it has inertia... it does not instantly drift down wind at the full speed of the xwind component. If you plant a main as you decrab and roll in a little bank, that will solve most of your drift problem. If you float in ground effect, then yeah you're going to need more bank.
Paladin145 is offline  
Old 02-26-2018, 05:44 PM
  #43  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by 1wife2airlines View Post
Even on aircraft designed to land in a crab, such as the T-38, most guys naturally gravitated to a decrab in the flare.
No, that is not the case, based on my experience.

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
I had an IP in -38s, LtCol Bucholz, he could throw the stick all around the cockpit so fast the plane barely moved—in formation,...GF
You can have the T-38 in fingertip, get the stick moving fore and aft, and actually bouncing off of the stops... and stay in position.

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
... line captains need to constructively criticize bad techniques and explain good techniques and let F/Os learn. Those that can’t or won’t are doing aviation a disservice.
Word.

Last edited by HuggyU2; 02-26-2018 at 05:58 PM.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 02-26-2018, 07:46 PM
  #44  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,002
Default

Originally Posted by WesternSkies View Post
technique is technique but I don’t know anyone who lands in the crab except by accident.
The 747 calls for landing crabbed.

There's a lot of mass to be kicking out, and while it can be done, the FCOM/AFM calls for landing crabbed. I've done it both ways, and combinations, in some very strong crosswinds and very gusty conditions.

Get some time in conventional gear airplanes where landing with any crab at all will eat your lunch for three days straight. You'll hear this advice all the time, and it isn't wrong, but what works in one aircraft isn't necessarily appropriate in others. Same for swept wing aircraft; the technique in one is not necessarily the technique in all.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 04:08 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 78
Default CRJ-900 Wing Strike

This one is in very gusty conditions.
Looks like the speed bled off, and the plane landed hard, and caught a wing tip.

I had one veteran CRJ pilot tell me that in some cases the auto throttle can't keep up in this type of condition ?

CAUGHT ON VIDEO: Jet makes rough landing at RDU during high winds
Paladin145 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 04:14 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by Paladin145 View Post
This one is in very gusty conditions.
Looks like the speed bled off, and the plane landed hard, and caught a wing tip.

I had one veteran CRJ pilot tell me that in some cases the auto throttle can't keep up in this type of condition ?

CAUGHT ON VIDEO: Jet makes rough landing at RDU during high winds
On this CRJ9, there was no wind. appears to be really high pitch, high bank.

Incident: Mesa CRJ9 at McAllen on Sep 29th 2015, wing tip strike on landing
Paladin145 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 07:18 AM
  #47  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Paladin145 View Post
On this CRJ9, there was no wind. appears to be really high pitch, high bank.

Incident: Mesa CRJ9 at McAllen on Sep 29th 2015, wing tip strike on landing
He either got a little shear/downdraft at the last moment or was using CRJ200 sight picture in a 900 and had to panic-flare to limit VS on impact. Actually the attitude on approach looked OK for a 900.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 07:22 AM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Paladin145 View Post
Rickair,

Good points. It can do fine in crosswinds, if pilots are taught properly. Only one check airman told me " if you flare too much, crosswinds will eat you up in this airplane." He said to get it on the ground. Other LCA's insisted on wing low, with a soft landing.

I read that the roll rate is very fast for a PAX aircraft, but I can't find the roll rate written anywhere.
The 200 has a VERY low approach pitch sight picture, plus you flare later than in larger jets. You'll find you have to brief jumpseaters on that, or you'll scare the heck out of them. I was taught well from day one, would flare even later than most 200 pilots, and could consistently nail spot landings. They would be smooth too. Could never achieve quit the same consistency with larger jets, moment arms to large to be as predictable.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 11:08 AM
  #49  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
The 200 has a VERY low approach pitch sight picture, plus you flare later than in larger jets. You'll find you have to brief jumpseaters on that, or you'll scare the heck out of them. I was taught well from day one, would flare even later than most 200 pilots, and could consistently nail spot landings. They would be smooth too. Could never achieve quit the same consistency with larger jets, moment arms to large to be as predictable.
That's impressive, if you can consistently land the CRJ-200.
Can I ask who trained you? My training was different depending on the LCA.
Some got worried if you flared too low, and said you are going to hit nose wheel.
Other's were fine with it. You have to flare quick if you flare at 10' . Quick, with just the correct amount of pitch. When jumpseating, I noticed 200 pilots go from -2.5 ' to about - 1' at around 20 feet. Then at 10 feet, from -1' to +1' pitch. I saw this on more than one observation flight. Of course, they were looking down the runway, and not consciously selecting a pitch.
Paladin145 is offline  
Old 03-04-2018, 05:56 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: Wichita
Posts: 667
Default

Nothing freaks me out more than the super low flare. There is no reason for it unless you’re trying to frighten the guys sitting around you. I’ve seen it on all sizes of aircraft from the 200 to the 74 and no one likes it at any level.

Having said that, no technique is the perfect way. My technique depends on the amount of crosswind component. Just do what works for you.
JackStraw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HSLD
Regional
26
01-22-2008 06:48 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
0
11-06-2006 06:18 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
10
11-05-2006 09:45 PM
cub pilot
Corporate
0
08-04-2006 12:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices