Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Runway analysis Landing distance question >

Runway analysis Landing distance question

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Runway analysis Landing distance question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2007, 12:43 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A300-600F Captain
Posts: 13
Default Runway analysis Landing distance question

Our airline's runway analysis has a landing distance for landing beyond threshold and another one for landing beyond glide slope. For each distance it has the corresponding maximum weight allowable for that distance/runway.

My question is, what regulation or Ops Spec or other guidance addresses which landing distance you should use?

My assumption is that if you're on a visual approach, perhaps the beyond threshold distance is usable. If an ILS approach is used, perhaps the beyond glide slope distance is requied. However, we all know that one cannot descend below glide slope until necessary for landing. Is the beyond threshold distance ever permitted?

Any opinions or references to where this might be covered would be great.

Thanks!
metro-mia is offline  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:14 PM
  #2  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

I'd say it's best to always be conservative, and use the worst-case values. And really, even in visual landing conditions, most operators I've seen land on the slope, using it or not.
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 06:50 AM
  #3  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: A300-600F Captain
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer View Post
I'd say it's best to always be conservative, and use the worst-case values. And really, even in visual landing conditions, most operators I've seen land on the slope, using it or not.

That's what I think as well. Just wondering what the legal "FAA" answer is. However, it probably is like most things and depends on the FSDO, POI, region, time of year, airport and who you ask.

Thanks for your reply.
metro-mia is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:40 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,252
Default

Large airplanes are REQUIRED to use the visual glideslope (part 91) if conducting a visual approach. I would use the GS numbers unless you have specific guidance otherwise.

Maybe that's info for emergency situations?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-02-2007, 06:09 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airbum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by metro-mia View Post
Our airline's runway analysis has a landing distance for landing beyond threshold and another one for landing beyond glide slope. For each distance it has the corresponding maximum weight allowable for that distance/runway.

My question is, what regulation or Ops Spec or other guidance addresses which landing distance you should use?

My assumption is that if you're on a visual approach, perhaps the beyond threshold distance is usable. If an ILS approach is used, perhaps the beyond glide slope distance is requied. However, we all know that one cannot descend below glide slope until necessary for landing. Is the beyond threshold distance ever permitted?

Any opinions or references to where this might be covered would be great.

Thanks!
Would your question be referencing legal requirements for Dispatch or airborne operations?

My carrier uses total landing distance available for the FAR requirements to dispatch (ie distance after glideslope not applied). Once in the air the AOM charts are used.
Airbum is offline  
Old 06-25-2011, 02:49 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 236
Default

Airbum makes an important point, for turbojet dispatch 121 requires that landing weight allows a full stop within 60% of available runway (121.195 & 197).

Once airborne the only "requirement" is that you can get it stopped in the length of the pavement.

At all four of the 121 carriers where I've worked, runway analysis tables were used for dispatch and AFM landing distance tables were used for airborne reference. The runway analysis tables are typically generated by a third-party, but are based on manufacturer's data.

121 dispatch landing weight requirements are essentially based on a 50' threshold crossing height, ie: glideslope (121.195-197). Part 25 transport category airworthiness standards also dictate that landing distance data is based on landing from "a point 50 feet above the landing surface" (25.125). So, as far as I know, all of the manufacturer's data would essentially be based on landing "beyond glide slope" as your airline puts it. I'd be curious to know more about your tables, sounds like custom info that your company has requested or generated--though it would have to be based on manufacturer's data. Very interesting.
Speed is offline  
Old 06-30-2011, 02:54 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 248
Default

The FAR referenced, as stated, is applicable only to dispatch. To determine tha actual runway available for landing, Landing Distance Available (LDA), you need to look at the back of the 10-9 page. For the given runway there may be a number next the the published distance after glideslope. If this number is published then this is the legal LDA. If no number is in the column, then the LDA is the published runway length. Typically, Boeing will publish stopping distances that include touchdown 1000' down the runway. The glideslope may take you farther down the runway depending on GP angle. It seems your company has looked at both cases depending on approach type.
cougar is offline  
Old 07-05-2011, 02:03 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 45
Default

Just curious, what keeps you from just calling your company flight tech department or training department and ask them. When I come up with something I don't understand in the books, I usually just call them. That way you are assured to get the right answer, and not some guy on the line interpretation.

Just recently transitioned to a WB flying to destinations that had escape routes on the way. Had some serious questions about these, asked the guys I flew with and got many different answers. Finally called the flight tech dep that calculates the routes and got the real answers.

Same with these boards, great to get another perspective, but I would still start with your company.
KLM pilot is offline  
Old 04-23-2019, 08:33 AM
  #9  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 1
Default How to Post a Question

I am new to this forum. How do I post a question about Landing Distance Beyond Threshold as it pertains to notes on the 10-9A page?

Thx
MSL007
MSL007 is offline  
Old 04-23-2019, 08:56 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,252
Default

Originally Posted by MSL007 View Post
I am new to this forum. How do I post a question about Landing Distance Beyond Threshold as it pertains to notes on the 10-9A page?

Thx
MSL007
Create a new thread in this forum if you like. Or you can just post it here since this thread topic is landing distance performance.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AUS_ATC
Cargo
29
02-02-2007 06:17 AM
miker1369
Major
4
11-24-2006 12:55 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
31
10-10-2006 07:20 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
9
04-15-2006 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices