Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Forward Slip landings >

Forward Slip landings

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Forward Slip landings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2019, 01:24 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 75
Default Forward Slip landings

I have my PPL checkride tomorrow (pending weather). I feel I am about as prepared as I ever will be. My CFI says I am probably one of the most prepared PPL students he has had. Extremely nervous...

I think I will do pretty good on the oral, but I am worried about the practical. I am most worried about steep turns and the forward slip to landing.

My steep turns are not bad, but sometimes on my left steep turn I bump the altitude a bit on roll out. I can't always get the trim out quick enough to not climb as I roll out (I try to put forward pressure while I take the trim out but will struggle to keep it from climbing). I have been doing 1 swipe of trim and then just back pressure for the steep turns. Before I was doing 2 swipes of trim, which was more difficult to not bump altitude on rollout.

The forward slip landings are my biggest concern. My approach and the slip itself is good, but I get so much float down the runway. I end up probably 200'-300' past the 1000' markers. When I start the actual forward slip on final I pitch for 70 kts. There is a park with lots of trees before the runway we typically land on (17). The air is turbulent over the trees, so I really do not want to go less than 70, because there is a tendency for airspeed to bounce around when flying over the trees. I do not want it to drop too much.

The chief flight instructor said if you have excessive floating you either have too much airspeed or not looking down runway enough. By the time I round out I am doing about 65-68 kts. I verbally tell myself to pick up my eyes to look down runway when I roundout.

Any suggestions so I do not float as far?
Douglas89 is offline  
Old 11-07-2019, 01:53 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Default

What type of plane are you flying?
DontLookDown is offline  
Old 11-07-2019, 01:57 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Default

Nvm I just saw another post from you indicating C172.

You’ve already been given good advice.

Some C172s don’t recommend slips with full flaps. Adding full flaps after taking out the slip is one way you could add drag and limit the float.

Considering your checkride is tomorrow, don’t overthink anything. Stay relaxed and confident and you’ll do fine
DontLookDown is offline  
Old 11-07-2019, 04:31 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

So if you are at 70kts in the slip creating all that drag, just imagine the energy state you come out to when you straighten out with no drag on the fuselage. That’s kinda like coming in at 75kts from a crazy high approach. The two things you can do are slow down in the slip or adjust the approach path shorter and round out higher to bleed more airspeed quicker to increase sink.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 11-07-2019, 05:35 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 459
Default

Maybe I’m out of the loop, but 70 knots while forward slipping to a landing seems counter productive. I haven’t been in a single or worked on any of those maneuvers in years though.
EMAW is offline  
Old 11-07-2019, 06:29 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by EMAW View Post
Maybe I’m out of the loop, but 70 knots while forward slipping to a landing seems counter productive. I haven’t been in a single or worked on any of those maneuvers in years though.
Yea, maybe I should come in slower. I fly a 172N. It is lighter than the R models and definitely floats a bit more when landing. The few times I have flown a 172R, after roundout they just sit down.

Normal approach speed on final is 65. Perhaps like James mentioned, perform the slip at a slower airspeed. Maybe 65 instead of 70. I know that even a 5 kt. difference in airspeed on landings makes a pretty big difference in the 172.
Douglas89 is offline  
Old 11-08-2019, 12:40 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Your approach speed should be 1.3 times the stall speed in the configuration you are using. Usually stall speeds in GA airplanes are published for maximum gross weight. Since your weight is most likely less than maximum gross if you use the published stall speed to figure your approach speed you will still be fast. There is a formula for determining the decrease in stall speed with a decrease in weight but I can’t remember it off the top of my head. It’s the same principle as pushing the nose over in an upset to decrease your stall speed. At an “extreme” example at the top of a loop an airplane’s airspeed will be well below the published stall speed yet as long as you push (decreasing the aircraft’s weight), you will not stall and will have full aileron effectiveness (which is how you do a half Loop with a roll).
Hope this helps instead of confusing.
Blackhawk is offline  
Old 11-08-2019, 09:21 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Important to remember that you IAS during a slip is not a direct representation of the relative wind, the static port is either seeing more or less pressure than normal due to being exposed on the side of the fuselage, depending on which way you are slipping. So 70kts isn't really 70kts. Also, slipping at x pitch attitude (high drag situation), if you come out of that slip and don't change pitch attitude, you're going to pick up a ton of speed real fast due the lower drag, so you usually pitch up some as you come out of the slip, which all means you have to take into account the actual approach path, which isn't quite as simple as aim where you want to go, you have to make compensations.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 11-10-2019, 05:49 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 75
Default

I appreciate all the input from everyone. I passed the checkride! Woohoo. Honestly, I'm not as relieved from the stress leading up to the checkride as I thought I would be... I guess just knowing the mountain I still have to climb (Instrument, Comm, CFI)

My steep turns were very good. Stayed on altitude, maintained 45 bank, hit wake turbulence on roll out. They were probably the best steep turns I have ever done actually.

Landings were okayyy... The winds were from the North (normally from the south). So I am not as familiar landing on Runway 35. The approach is pretty different as Runway 35 has a very large displaced threshold. I tried to lock in on the papi. My approaches were stabilized but not as good as what I have been doing. I feel there were things I did not do as well as I normally do so I was disappointed in myself for that, but regardless I have my private pilot certificate now and can start working on my instrument.
Douglas89 is offline  
Old 11-10-2019, 07:13 PM
  #10  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Congrats on your first milestone.
Stay humble, stay smart and enjoy the journey ahead of you.
TiredSoul is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slujaime
Flight Schools and Training
10
12-28-2016 11:30 AM
StudentsScareMe
Technical
11
11-08-2015 11:45 AM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
15
06-04-2007 06:24 PM
thrustborne
Technical
5
04-26-2007 05:40 AM
MikeInTx
Flight Schools and Training
24
03-30-2007 07:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices