Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
How to decode Russian METAR's >

How to decode Russian METAR's

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

How to decode Russian METAR's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-2009, 09:03 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 322
Default How to decode Russian METAR's

Hey ye all.

I recently required a russian metar for the first time and could not decode some of the info.

Does anybody know what this means?

QFE747/996 and MT OBSC.

Obviously the QFE is 996 but what is QFE747 and obviously something is obscured but what is MT.

Anybody?
oicur12 is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 05:07 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

I tried multiple METAR decoders on the net and couldn't find your answer. I agree that the QFE would seem to be 996 and I would have thought the MT OBSC meant Mountain Obscruation; but I'm not sure. It should be intersting to learn this tidbit of info.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 08:06 AM
  #3  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Inches, Millibars, Hectopascals

QFE is "Q-Field Elevation" (as opposed to QNH: Q--Normal Height; QNE---Q, Normal Elevation).

QFE gives an altimeter reading of Zero at touchdown.

As to the METAR, I got the translation from United's Operations manual. Russia and China largely use Hectopascals instead of millibars for altimeter settings (they also use Meters for altitudes). I learned this 10 years ago while flying the 747-400 and a lot of routes covered eastern Russia and China.

Anyway, according to the table, 744 Hectopascals is 992 millibars. Why the discrepancy? (992 vs 996). Not sure, but I would guess a slight roundoff or operator error in putting the data in the METAR (a lot of this stuff is still done manually in that part of the world, not automatically).

And I believe USMC is correct with Mountain Obscuration.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 08:30 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

Ah, Hectopascals = Millibars. 992 millibars is the same as 992 hectopascals.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 10:26 AM
  #5  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Ooops! Mea Culpa

Misread the title of the Table. It is 744 mm of mercury = 996 millibars.

Otherwise, as I said previous.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
Misread the title of the Table. It is 744 mm of mercury = 996 millibars.

Otherwise, as I said previous.
But the orginal question was 747 wasn't it?
So 747 mm = how much millibars?

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 04-25-2009, 11:23 AM
  #7  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default 747 mm = 996 mb

USMC:

I'm a dough-head; I wrote down the wrong number.

747= 996. Perfect.


If I had thought to multiply 29.92 inches times 254 mm/inch, I could have figured this out sooner. (760 mm is std day).
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:13 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 647
Default

China, Cuba, Russia and certain countries in Africa like Congo still use the metric system and QFE. On approach in one of those countries, you will receive a QFE setting but you can still request a QNH. Pilots should be cautious when assigned an altitude. You must query the controller if not sure. He may give you a QNH setting to later give you an assigned altitude in reference to QFE! It is your responsibility to ensure you have the correct setting or to make the conversion.

Here is the deadly scenario. You are about to land at an airport at an elevation above sea level of 3000 feet. Your destination is surrounded by terrain. You receive a QNH setting of 1013 mb and can read on your altimeter 10,000 feet. The controller now assign you to descent and maintain 3,000 feet. Little did you know that he meant 3000 feet in relation to QFE or 6,000 feet MSL. If not careful, you will descent and get yourself a nice CFIT.
bubi352 is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 05:52 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
shanKs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: HS-125
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by bubi352 View Post
China, Cuba, Russia and certain countries in Africa like Congo still use the metric system and QFE. On approach in one of those countries, you will receive a QFE setting but you can still request a QNH. Pilots should be cautious when assigned an altitude. You must query the controller if not sure. He may give you a QNH setting to later give you an assigned altitude in reference to QFE! It is your responsibility to ensure you have the correct setting or to make the conversion.

Here is the deadly scenario. You are about to land at an airport at an elevation above sea level of 3000 feet. Your destination is surrounded by terrain. You receive a QNH setting of 1013 mb and can read on your altimeter 10,000 feet. The controller now assign you to descent and maintain 3,000 feet. Little did you know that he meant 3000 feet in relation to QFE or 6,000 feet MSL. If not careful, you will descent and get yourself a nice CFIT.
100% correct. Fortunately on arrivals and approaches the plates have the altitude conversions from qfe to qnh. If that doesn't make it hard enough let's talk about the 1950's radios they have and trying to understand their instructions with a thick accent.
shanKs is offline  
Old 04-26-2009, 07:49 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,729
Default

You sure China is QFE? Maybe they just gave us QNH because of the way we talked. I know Hong Kong is QNH, QFE on request. Push the "metric" button and keep on going.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
JDFlyer
Cargo
7
04-01-2009 04:14 AM
Kilgore Trout
Hangar Talk
32
02-21-2009 11:00 AM
stoki
Hangar Talk
26
08-21-2008 06:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices