Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
VGP: have you used it? >

VGP: have you used it?

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

VGP: have you used it?

Old 12-08-2011, 07:44 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Flight Test's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Gettin' it certified
Posts: 38
Default VGP: have you used it?

• Have you used Vertical Glide Path (VGP) on GPS approaches?
• How does it work?
• Why not just use the LPV and VNAV for vertical guidance?
• Is it useful?
• When can you use it?
• What airframe or gps install did you use it on?


Thanks

-FT
Flight Test is offline  
Old 12-15-2011, 07:48 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Flight Test's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Gettin' it certified
Posts: 38
Default

My understanding is it comes on certain Honeywell FMS units and is used to get glidepath indications for visual approaches from the VDP on down. Yes? No? It has to be already be a visual descent the way I understand it, which would happen at the VDP in most cases.
Flight Test is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 08:30 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,168
Default

Speaking Collins now, VGP is an approach mode for Baro VNAV that replaces VPTH. So, you enter an approach with a charted Baro VNAV descent gradient; arm APPR and VNAV, and intercept the course and path; the FD mode changes to VGP and the FD/ AP now behave like it is an ILS. Particularly the ALT Selector which can now be set to the missed approach altitude. The FD will NOT have a level-off altitude as in a non-precision approach with a MDA, the pilot will see a GP to the runway.

It does make compatible approaches more like an ILS; is not a substitute for LPV (it was developed prior to LPV) and is on all ProLine 4 and 21 installations, at least all Bombardier ones.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 09:09 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EvilMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Chris's Closet
Posts: 485
Default

The E-170/175/190/195 has the capability to do VGP approaches. On the E-Jets, it works much like an ILS only the needles are magenta instead of green. The sensitivity remains constant, unlike an ILS, so the course and glideslope don't get squirrelly close to the ground. We (S5) can shoot these approaches using LNAV/VNAV minimums on any compatible RNAV approach.
EvilMonkey is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 09:36 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey View Post
The E-170/175/190/195 has the capability to do VGP approaches. On the E-Jets, it works much like an ILS only the needles are magenta instead of green. The sensitivity remains constant, unlike an ILS, so the course and glideslope don't get squirrelly close to the ground. We (S5) can shoot these approaches using LNAV/VNAV minimums on any compatible RNAV approach.
EvilMonkey -

If I understand it right - there is nothing to get squirrelly. It is a math problem whereas an ILS is an electronic signal in space most likely bounced off the ground and susceptible to all sorts of irregularities - - correct?

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 10:33 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EvilMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Chris's Closet
Posts: 485
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey View Post
The E-170/175/190/195 has the capability to do VGP approaches. On the E-Jets, it works much like an ILS only the needles are magenta instead of green. The sensitivity remains constant, unlike an ILS, so the course and glideslope don't get squirrelly close to the ground. We (S5) can shoot these approaches using LNAV/VNAV minimums on any compatible RNAV approach.
EvilMonkey -

If I understand it right - there is nothing to get squirrelly. It is a math problem whereas an ILS is an electronic signal in space most likely bounced off the ground and susceptible to all sorts of irregularities - - correct?

USMCFLYR
You got it. The "needle" sensitivity remains at a mathematical fixed sensitivity, 0.3 RNP, both for the lateral guidance and glidepath.
EvilMonkey is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 10:42 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey View Post
You got it. The "needle" sensitivity remains at a mathematical fixed sensitivity, 0.3 RNP, both for the lateral guidance and glidepath.
I know what you mean by squirrelly, though one I flew recently seemed to be doing dutch rolls just inside 10 miles on the localizer. Not so sure if that was the signal or my own poor autopilot, but it was noticeable!

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 10:54 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EvilMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Chris's Closet
Posts: 485
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey View Post
You got it. The "needle" sensitivity remains at a mathematical fixed sensitivity, 0.3 RNP, both for the lateral guidance and glidepath.
I know what you mean by squirrelly, though one I flew recently seemed to be doing dutch rolls just inside 10 miles on the localizer. Not so sure if that was the signal or my own poor autopilot, but it was noticeable!

USMCFLYR
Interesting. I've seen the 170 autopilot do some goofy things when someone drives a plane through the ILS critical area...kind of like a pronounced phugoid cycle with the pitch. What aircraft do you fly?
EvilMonkey is offline  
Old 12-18-2011, 01:00 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by EvilMonkey View Post
Interesting. I've seen the 170 autopilot do some goofy things when someone drives a plane through the ILS critical area...kind of like a pronounced phugoid cycle with the pitch. What aircraft do you fly?
King Air 300.
The autopilot is not the best and sometimes you can't really tell up front if it is the AP or the signals that are bad/degraded. Some signals actually have bends or steps in them and that is just the way they are engineered.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 10:21 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Flight Test's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Gettin' it certified
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Speaking Collins now, VGP is an approach mode for Baro VNAV that replaces VPTH. So, you enter an approach with a charted Baro VNAV descent gradient; arm APPR and VNAV, and intercept the course and path; the FD mode changes to VGP and the FD/ AP now behave like it is an ILS. Particularly the ALT Selector which can now be set to the missed approach altitude. The FD will NOT have a level-off altitude as in a non-precision approach with a MDA, the pilot will see a GP to the runway.

It does make compatible approaches more like an ILS; is not a substitute for LPV (it was developed prior to LPV) and is on all ProLine 4 and 21 installations, at least all Bombardier ones.

GF
Winning response, thanks. Various pieces of gear are hard to understand if you have never used them. I have not used baro-VNAV so am guessing you can't couple to most baro-VNAV approaches although you can possibly still get the FD indications.

The way I understand VGP is, it gives you a calculated glidepath based on whatever it uses (blended RNAV, Baro-VNAV, GPS?) which allows you to fly a coupled approach all the way down. There apparently is also some advantage to this besides being coupled, such as freeing the alt bug for other purposes which suggests it would need to be stuck at minimums otherwise.

Getting warm?
Flight Test is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices