![]() |
Peoples Express Exemption 3585
To use the exemption you need a 2nd alternate that is "Golden". So you have destination(crappy), alternate(crappy), 2nd alternate(golden).
Why not just file destination + 2nd "golden" alternate initially and your good without exemption. Is it because you cannot land at any airport not on dispatch release and you most likely will get into one of the first two, where you really want to land. Trying to understand why you would ever use this if your legal with just your destination and golden alternate. |
EX 3585 applies to the destination and/OR the first ALT. In other words if your destination wx is below mins in the conditional language (TEMPO, PROB, BECMG) but your first ALT is suitable, a second ALT must be listed due to the destination wx.
|
Originally Posted by ninjadriver
(Post 1381294)
EX 3585 applies to the destination and/OR the first ALT. In other words if your destination wx is below mins in the conditional language (TEMPO, PROB, BECMG) but your first ALT is suitable, a second ALT must be listed due to the destination wx.
|
Originally Posted by ninjadriver
(Post 1381294)
EX 3585 applies to the destination and/OR the first ALT. In other words if your destination wx is below mins in the conditional language (TEMPO, PROB, BECMG) but your first ALT is suitable, a second ALT must be listed due to the destination wx.
|
You've read Richie Lengel's explanation in Everything Explained for the Professional Pilot, right? He gives the best explanation of it I have heard. It helps if you know the background of the rule, how People's Express had a weak meteorology department and requested a way around that weakness, which the FAA granted with this rule.
|
Slough,
I think you are confusing two different things here. A 2nd ALT is required in two scenarios. 1) Marginal wx at the destination AND first alternate (marginal defined by company opspecs) (Both Airports considered) 2) EX 3585 used due to wx below minimums in conditional language at the destination AND/OR first alternate. (One or Both Airports considered) |
Originally Posted by slough
(Post 1381306)
If your first alternate is suitable, why couldn't you just depart with your destination and a suitable(legal) alternate ?
|
Originally Posted by ninjadriver
(Post 1381351)
Slough,
I think you are confusing two different things here. A 2nd ALT is required in two scenarios. 1) Marginal wx at the destination AND first alternate (marginal defined by company opspecs) (Both Airports considered) 2) EX 3585 used due to wx below minimums in conditional language at the destination AND/OR first alternate. (One or Both Airports considered) |
If you have a destination and two alternates, one of those alternates being good enough weather to be listed as the only alternate:
Why not just list your destination and the good weather alternate and forget about the marginal weather alternate? That is what is confusing me. |
Originally Posted by slough
(Post 1384618)
Why not just list your destination and the good weather alternate and forget about the marginal weather alternate? That is what is confusing me. |
This rule is a scam. I have been dispatched under this one time personally. For the hours that are spent teaching new guys this or simply arguing the 20 different opinions people come up , drop the exemption and delay the flight .
I am sure someone will key in and say they get dispatched under it all the time . 5000 hours personally and I rarely rarely rarely rarely see it. I agree the way Everything Explained for the Professional Pilot does have a great way of sharing his explanation |
Originally Posted by amcflyboy
(Post 1384415)
This is the understanding I have. At my company, marginal WX is 600-2
NOTE: there are conditional limitations and derived limitations that deal with visibility and/or ceilings that must be considered. |
Originally Posted by slough
(Post 1384618)
If you have a destination and two alternates, one of those alternates being good enough weather to be listed as the only alternate:
Why not just list your destination and the good weather alternate and forget about the marginal weather alternate? That is what is confusing me. |
Yup, use it several times per winter at a large regional with lots of poor weather.
|
Oh, and it was "People Express."
|
Originally Posted by txlnnbl
(Post 1385711)
If 3585 is used, the destination weather isn't only low enough to require an alternate, it's also too low to dispatch a flight to under normal circumstances (even with an alternate). You can't dispatch a flight under 121 to a destination unless the weather is forecast to at least meet approach minimums (e.x. 1/2 mile for a typical ILS). If the main body of the TAF calls for 1/4 mile visibility, you couldn't dispatch a flight to that airport even with a suitable alternate. But if that 1/4 mile visibility is only forecast in a conditional part of the TAF (such as TEMPO, BECMG, or PROB) then you can apply 3585 and dispatch the flight provided the soft and hard alternates are added.
I didn't know destination weather could be limiting for dispatch, that's what was so confusing to me. Makes sense now. Thanks. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands