Search

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Exemption 3585

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2013 | 04:50 AM
  #1  
TheFly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default Exemption 3585

Can anyone break down this exemption in simple terms? Thanks.
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 05:24 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: B-73N FO
Default

Ill give it a go.

Let's say that your destination TAF doesn't look so hot. You need 1/2sm to go there and the TAF says tempo 1/4. 3585 allows you to still dispatch there, but requires a second alternate to be listed, and fuel for the furthest alternate. The caveat is that the weather below your minimums must be at least 50% of what you need, and must be part of a conditional statement in the TAF (part of a prob30, prob40 or tempo line). Same can be done if your first alt is below the derived alternate mins, same rules apply ( conditional and 50%). 2nd alternate has to meet all weather mins.

That's about as simple as I can make it, anyone else have a better means of making it clear as mud?
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 05:42 AM
  #3  
bhmdiversion's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default Exemption 3585

Half Half Full is the term we use in OCC if for some reason were dispatching 3585. Emb170man had it pretty close.
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 05:47 AM
  #4  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 133
Default

Originally Posted by TheFly
Can anyone break down this exemption in simple terms? Thanks.
It means "You're effing going!"
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 06:25 AM
  #5  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,172
Likes: 805
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Conditional language = PROB or TEMP. We used to consider BCMG as a conditional term but no more apparently (not sure if that's just us, or the FAA).

You can go if:

1. DEST VIS Cond. Lang. >= 1/2 of that required for the approach. Also CIG >= 1/2 required only if CIG is a published requirement in the approach (not the norm).

AND

2. 1ST ALT VIS & CIG Cond. Lang. >= 1/2 of that required for the approach. Required CIG in this case, if not published, would be the MDA/DH.

AND

3. 2ND ALT VIS & CIG >= normal minimums (2ND ALT is always required for 3585 at least for us).

In all cases main body language must meet mins.
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 08:54 AM
  #6  
snippercr's Avatar
Does NOT get weekends off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: ERJ - 145
Default

If you can then combine 3585 with 1nav/2nav at some example airports to determine exactly WHAT your minimums at that airport have to be, you are golden!
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 09:54 AM
  #7  
Cubdriver's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
From: ATP, CFI etc.
Default

This rule is a pita and it is rarely used. Most pilots kind of hate it, but knowing the history helps a bit. It was an exemption granted originally to Peoples Express to normal FAA weather rules helping them compete with mainline companies who had more expensive weather departments and their own certified WX reports. The mainlines would get to fly when the same Peoples Express flights had to sit around waiting for NWS updates. It was a way to level the playing field a little bit, making conditional remarks being somewhat vague by nature, less restrictive and less confining for those who cannot afford independent WX reports. Richie Lengel's book also has a good explanation.
Reply
Old 11-23-2013 | 07:28 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,291
Likes: 114
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
This rule is a pita and it is rarely used. Most pilots kind of hate it, but knowing the history helps a bit. It was an exemption granted originally to Peoples Express to normal FAA weather rules helping them compete with mainline companies who had more expensive weather departments and their own certified WX reports. The mainlines would get to fly when the same Peoples Express flights had to sit around waiting for NWS updates. It was a way to level the playing field a little bit, making conditional remarks being somewhat vague by nature, less restrictive and less confining for those who cannot afford independent WX reports. Richie Lengel's book also has a good explanation.
"Back in the day", there were other methods to use as well, probably used in conjunction with 3585. Things like planned re-dispatch enroute. Also, even though some may not have been able to pay for their own WX departments, they could pay for something like a RAMTAF, etc from a private vendor. My prior company used to do both.

Even with the experience I have with 3585, as soon as I see in on the release the FIRST thing I do is pull out the FOM and read the section. It simply chews up too much of my personal memory space to memorize it. Combine that if it's a 5 am show following an RR overnight, etc.
Reply
Old 11-24-2013 | 06:24 AM
  #9  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,172
Likes: 805
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Conditional language = PROB or TEMP. We used to consider BCMG as a conditional term but no more apparently (not sure if that's just us, or the FAA).
To answer my own question...

Aviation Weather Services AC 00-45G Change 1 no longer includes BCMG as one of the Forecast Change Indicator Groups for TAF's. Only FM, TEMPO and PROB are used. BCMG can still be used in area forecasts, just not TAFs.
Reply
Old 12-13-2013 | 07:45 PM
  #10  
DroopsN10's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: lav specialist
Default

Good stuff here I haven't heard of before. So to really dumb is down it's a backup for your first alt if it has a TEMPO or PROB in the taf? 2nd alt has to meet all wx reqs. Also do you have to have enough fuel to get to your 2nd alternate with reserves or just enough to get to that point. Thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cubdriver
Flight Schools and Training
45
02-20-2014 08:15 AM
viking767
Cargo
29
08-26-2013 06:16 PM
slough
Technical
15
04-07-2013 03:49 PM
greggo
Cargo
8
04-02-2009 06:45 AM
NGINEWHOISWHAT
Major
3
12-24-2006 10:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices