Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

B727 failures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2006, 12:38 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ve764's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11 FO Furloughed
Posts: 101
Default

My first go around in a jet was a 72 with -17 engines landing at Gitmo,and man that baby shot back up in the sky. III thanks for reminding me forgot about the trusty A/B mode!!!! Kieran,we are envious but pay us back with great stories of your own some time.
Ve764 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 01:21 PM
  #12  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by Kieran View Post
Great insight guys! I loved reading that III Corps, anyone else want to share their experiences in the ol 727?

Thanks once again III Corps
At 'my house' we had a lot of guys from different airlines and it was amazing to see how differently the same machine was operated by different carriers. FWIW, at 'my house' DOWN was ON and UP was OFF. I can't remember which it was but at TWA, it was one way and at Eastern it was the other.. UP/OFF or DOWN/OFF. At any rate, when they went to Lockheed for the L-1011 the same fight erupted.. which was was it? The -1011 was the first airplane, I am told, where there was a push to engage/push to disengage switches which solved the UP/DOWN ON/OFF problem.

There were various techniques to land the Tri-Motor. Some favored the 'push' where in the flare, just before touchdown you released a slight amount of back pressure. The wheels were aft of the center of rotation and by releasing or even a slight push would lift the gear so you could roll the Tri-Motor on. Of course, this all called for excellent timing. Others just parked the nose in the flare, pulled power off and held the picture. That also worked. What didn't work was, as I have noted, pulling back hard in the flare to save a landing. Didn't work in the MD-80 either.

The wing is the thing on the Seven-Two. We used to refer to flaps 40 and 100% wing disassembly what with the leading edge slats, flaps and *triple* slotted fowler flaps. From the back with full flaps, the 727 looked like a bird of prey mantling.

For new engineers, we would often pull all the dim caps off the lights on his/her panel and set them neatly in rows. Yellow was caution, red was emergency, blue for in-transit and green for operating.

On heavyweight takeoffs, you would brief the engineer that if anything really bad (engine failure, fire) happened, begin dumping fuel immediately and don't stop until you were on final. The Seven-Two was the last airplane I flew with dump capability. Never lost an engine on takeoff but did shut down the JT8D about 5 times for various reasons.

We had some machines with the nosewheel brakes and with them, the Seven Two would really stop.
III Corps is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 01:22 PM
  #13  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by Ve764 View Post
My first go around in a jet was a 72 with -17 engines landing at Gitmo,and man that baby shot back up in the sky. III thanks for reminding me forgot about the trusty A/B mode!!!! Kieran,we are envious but pay us back with great stories of your own some time.
So you're on the Seven Five now? Another fun flying machine but won't go down and slow down anywhere near like the old Seven Two...
III Corps is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 05:31 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B727
Posts: 194
Default

True about the slow flaps extension...but if you really needed to get down, you could put the speed brakes out and dump the gear at anything less than 270 then go to 320 for the descent. We were over McCarran one day at FL 180, and landed straight in on RW 4 (pretty sure it was 4, long time ago) at Nellis. No pax, of course. I believe it's less than 20 miles. It's really true what they say: if you can see it over the nose in level cruise, you can land on it. The one thing you didn't want was to be low, slow, and dirty, but if you kept a bit of extra speed to arrest the descent and spool up at 1000 agl or so, it was a piece of cake. I made my last flight on the 72 in may of this year, I'm missing it already. Would have been a great airplane to retire on.


Originally Posted by III Corps View Post
That and the APU but since it is not qualified for in-flight use, it just means an aircart to start and lots of heat on the ground in summer.

The initial flaps dribble out but once you get flaps 5 on the machine, the rest come out fairly quickly. Granted you have to be fairly slow for initial flaps (210 most often) and you can't use speedbrakes and flaps... as compared to the MD-80 where your slats come out right NOW and the initial flap extension speed is 280, as I remember.

You will also enjoy the 'cruise trim' which is half rate of the normal trip. We ran around at 0.86M (0.88M at times) routinely and the cruise trim helped with small trim changes.

I really enjoyed the Seven Two. We had quite a few and if you were operating in the "A" mode (not over 136,000ZFW or greater than 172,000) (odd how such stuff sticks in one's brain) you could rock and roll. We went into San Juan one afternoon with the speed'ometer over 400 indicated. Of course, you had to yell to be heard as the cockpit noise was incredibly high.

Hint: if you are going to fly the Seven Two and want to keep some of your hearing, wear earplugs or a very good headset when over 250kts.
org1 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 06:07 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BoxFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-767
Posts: 222
Default

I've got over 6 years in the 727, all three seats. Over-all, truely great jet! Sure, the jurassic jet can't go direct, no moving map or have auto-throttles. But you can do things in this jet that others, especially the wide bodies can't do.

Lost our A hyd. system once, maybe disconnected one csd over the years, but that's about it for problems. The 72 is a real champ. It loves to get up and fly.
BoxFlyer is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 06:50 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ve764's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11 FO Furloughed
Posts: 101
Default

Yeah I flew 72's in and out of MDW. Did a couple of high speed RTO's.Thank goodness for nosewheel brakes. III once again good point sir.
Ve764 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 07:19 PM
  #17  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by org1 View Post
True about the slow flaps extension...but if you really needed to get down, you could put the speed brakes out and dump the gear at anything less than 270 then go to 320 for the descent. We were over McCarran one day at FL 180, and landed straight in on RW 4 (pretty sure it was 4, long time ago) at Nellis. No pax, of course. I believe it's less than 20 miles. It's really true what they say: if you can see it over the nose in level cruise, you can land on it. The one thing you didn't want was to be low, slow, and dirty, but if you kept a bit of extra speed to arrest the descent and spool up at 1000 agl or so, it was a piece of cake. I made my last flight on the 72 in may of this year, I'm missing it already. Would have been a great airplane to retire on.
What was fun was to set about 2800-3000lbs on each engine in the pattern and not touch the throttle again. Play the gear and flaps right and you wouldn't have to touch the power. Downwind at 210--drop 1 and then 5 .. turn base and go 15... turn final, at slightly above glidepath drop the gear, and then 25 and then go 30 flaps and never have to touch the power except for minor adjustments.

I had a KC-135 instructor who would count the number of power changes for a mode of flight. Taxi out.. see how FEW power changes you had to make to get to the runway. Same for taxiing in. Same in the pattern. It taught you how to think WAY ahead and how to plan your use of fuel. I think the best I ever did was with a medium weight Seven-Two on a cold day I got to the runway without ever moving the throttles out of idle.
III Corps is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 09:21 PM
  #18  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

Originally Posted by org1 View Post
True about the slow flaps extension...but if you really needed to get down, you could put the speed brakes out and dump the gear at anything less than 270 then go to 320 for the descent.

Nah...Try going fully configured and pushing over to maintain Vref. It will take about 10 degrees pitch down and will give you in excess of 6000 fpm descent rate. Its a real elevator ride and you can really hit it if you can see it.

One of my last flight in the 72 I had to do the above metioned and I didnt spool up till under 200' and I rolled it on in STL...damn lucky....and yes I would rather be lucky than good.

In 6 years of flying the 727 I never really had much in the way of emergencies. I lost A system hyrdo a couple of time, had a few strut overheats, packs crapping out, lost control of pressureization of the cabin and flaps not fully extending but all in all....I never had to shut down an engine. But then again I had a few co-workers that had more than their fair share. My favorite one is the 13th Stage bleed tapet blew completely of the engine and through the engine cowling, they said it sounded like a shotgun going off and of course they were max weight on a hot day. I think they might had to change their shorts that day.
Thedude is offline  
Old 12-27-2006, 05:36 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B727
Posts: 194
Exclamation

...unspooled, fully configured, Vref, 200'?? (!!!!)


[QUOTE=Thedude;96107]Nah...Try going fully configured and pushing over to maintain Vref. It will take about 10 degrees pitch down and will give you in excess of 6000 fpm descent rate. Its a real elevator ride and you can really hit it if you can see it.

One of my last flight in the 72 I had to do the above metioned and I didnt spool up till under 200' and I rolled it on in STL...damn lucky....and yes I would rather be lucky than good.
org1 is offline  
Old 12-27-2006, 06:30 AM
  #20  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

[QUOTE=org1;96148]...unspooled, fully configured, Vref, 200'?? (!!!!)


Yup.....you should try it sometime.
Thedude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UConnQB14
Flight Schools and Training
20
07-09-2006 05:54 PM
stiffler773
Flight Schools and Training
13
06-21-2006 07:22 PM
rongway
Your Photos and Videos
1
06-18-2006 07:09 PM
Omar
Flight Schools and Training
0
08-22-2005 06:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices