Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
Autopilot at 30,000 ft and higher? >

Autopilot at 30,000 ft and higher?

Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

Autopilot at 30,000 ft and higher?

Old 05-06-2016, 11:40 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 14
Default Autopilot at 30,000 ft and higher?

Having a bit of an argument with someone that seems to think the following:

"Ask any airline pilot why it's necessary to have automation at 30,000 feet. They'll tell you that humans lack the dexterity to fly at that altitude, due to thin air."

Took a bit of back and forthing and now he relented a bit with this:

"So let me qualify my remarks about needing automation at altitude:
Today, yes, planes with fly-by-wire can fly manual at 30,000 feet."

He's still adamant that manual flight above 30,000 feet without fly-by-wire can only be done with automation.

I've challenged him to post on a forum like this but he's reluctant to do so. Seems pretty silly I know but it be great to hear from people who do this for a living. No sense bringing up anything about military flying since he'll just brush it off with how they say and do what they are told.
mako88sb is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 03:33 AM
  #2  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,475
Default

Its necessary to have automation at 30,000ft because RVSM airspace starts at FL290 and goes up to FL410, and the FARs require use of an autopilot for cruise in RVSM airspace.

Most airliners fly at or between these altitudes which requires use of an AP, and many airline FOM/GOMs require or "strongly suggest" use of autoflight systems during most phases of flight.

I hand flew at FL450 while part 91 once; of course that was a bizjet and not an airliner but somehow I'm still here to talk about it on the internet.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 04:32 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Just in case the OP is not familiar with RVSM airspace, that means "reduced vertical separation minimums". Essentially 1000' vertical separation between aircraft. The mandatory use of autopilot in RVSM airspace is a safety risk mitigation requirement to help prevent altitude deviations.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 04:39 AM
  #4  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: IPZ to Mr.
Posts: 1,915
Default

Originally Posted by mako88sb View Post
He's still adamant that manual flight above 30,000 feet without fly-by-wire can only be done with automation.
Well, I guess I'll have to strike all of that T-38 cross-country time at FL390 (hand flying at .9M) from my logbook, since apparently it isn't possible.

I do love the duality of you friend's argument though; on one hand, "humans lack the dexterity to fly at that altitude, due to thin air", and on the other, military guys can/do it because "they say and do what they are told".
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 04:45 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sourdough44's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: Left
Posts: 636
Default

I used to hand fly in the mid to upper 30's all the time in the military. Yeah, there is that RVSM issue nowadays.

No reason one can't hand fly in 'thinner air'. One can still do it now to check the trim/retrim or whatever if needed.
sourdough44 is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 04:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pokey9554's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Cessna 150
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Its necessary to have automation at 30,000ft because RVSM airspace starts at FL290 and goes up to FL410, and the FARs require use of an autopilot for cruise in RVSM airspace.
Originally Posted by PerfInit View Post
The mandatory use of autopilot in RVSM airspace is a safety risk mitigation requirement to help prevent altitude deviations.

To clarify, the FARs require an operational autopilot. There is no requirement in the FARs that it be engaged. Approved manuals for part 121 or 135 operators may have more strict requirements than the FARs.
pokey9554 is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 05:19 AM
  #7  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,475
Default

Originally Posted by pokey9554 View Post
To clarify, the FARs require an operational autopilot. There is no requirement in the FARs that it be engaged.
There's a legal difference between "operational" and "operable".
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 05:47 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,726
Default

I've hand flown a 727 at 42,000 feet. Definitely not a fly by wire aircraft. Autopilots are normally used in cruise because hand flying becomes tedious after a while. Nothing to do with "dexterity" or "thin air."
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 06:13 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,726
Default

To clarify, the FARs require an operational autopilot. There is no requirement in the FARs that it be engaged.
Actually the FARS, specifically Appendix G to Part 91 only says "the aircraft must be equipped with at least one automatic altitude control system ..."

AC 91-85 says "An automatic altitude-control system should be operative and engaged during level cruise, except when circumstances such as the need to retrim the aircraft or turbulence reguire disengagement." Of course an AC is only guidance.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 05-07-2016, 06:35 AM
  #10  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,309
Default

Autopilot kicked off on the CRJ once at 34,000; airplane instantly became inverted and uncontrollable until the captain managed to select the a/p back on. Scariest 16 seconds of my life.
PotatoChip is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices