Search
Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2015, 06:02 PM
  #9621  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by RgrMurdock View Post
The company will not be paying the bonus if this is ratified. Honestly what are you looking for? If you think the next offer will be double what you're getting your wrong. This has all been direct negotiations with the company. If this gets voted down, you really want the same guys at the table as last time we had negotiations? Again, I don't think it's worth it to take a chance and vote this down. Could be a long and painful road for everyone involved. Do people really think the company just passed this offer across the table and the union took it? There were negotiations involved over several months. But I guess every pilot group should vote down the first TA reached because they must have a better offer in their back pocket. Go to a roadshow and learn a thing or two please.
It's worth voting down to get something better that status quo, which is pretty much what this extension is. Get some qol improvements in the contract, better pay, a signing bonus better than a few hundred bucks after taxes (pathetic), and Then get something out of the pbs negotiations.
vaporlock1215 is offline  
Old 09-06-2015, 09:33 PM
  #9622  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default Trans States

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
AWAC is losing % points on their health insurance. Mesa, I hear is losing DH pay credits or some qol language. Skywest doesn't really count.

Which is why I specifically said that it was increasing economic value, not that there aren't any concessionary items here or there. But overall, it's an economic improvement from current book.

AWAC's health insurance premium are going from 25% to 27%. Still second only to xjt. That's the only concessionary item and therefore the entire TA is an economic improvement. As for Mesa, it's still a slight economic increase as is Skywest's 'contract.' They may be lower tiered contracts, no doubt, but the point I was making to you was that these were not concessionary TA's as you asserted everyone was getting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nevets is offline  
Old 09-07-2015, 12:53 AM
  #9623  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by RgrMurdock View Post
The company will not be paying the bonus if this is ratified. Honestly what are you looking for? If you think the next offer will be double what you're getting your wrong. This has all been direct negotiations with the company. If this gets voted down, you really want the same guys at the table as last time we had negotiations? Again, I don't think it's worth it to take a chance and vote this down. Could be a long and painful road for everyone involved. Do people really think the company just passed this offer across the table and the union took it? There were negotiations involved over several months. But I guess every pilot group should vote down the first TA reached because they must have a better offer in their back pocket. Go to a roadshow and learn a thing or two please.
So when every other airline matches this starting pay raise (Republic has already indicated they want to go to $40/hr) and raises with a bonus we won't? Remember when Ox said two years ago we aren't worried about staffing and the company would NEVER pay a bonus? The bonus is being paid because the market is demanding it, not because the company wants to do it. There is nothing now, or in the near future to indicate any changes to this dynamic.

Do you honestly think they put this TA on the table just because they are a bunch of nice guys? This offer is driven by the need to staff the company, which will not change if this is voted down. KS is a great guy, but not above trying to get a feather in his cap with Hulas by getting a good deal for the company, and this TA is a very good deal for the company.

Like I said if you think this TA is a good enough deal for you economically, vote for it. If you think a better deal is out there then vote against it. But don't let some irrational fear that the company is going to take its toys and go home for 6 years due to a no vote intimidate you. It isn't realistic. Management always predicts gloom and doom if their offer isn't passed. It is called negotiation 101.

As I said in a previous post, if they had offered a $5-$7,000 bonus with a 1% pay raise for Captains then this TA would have passed easily, but all they are after is 50%+1 and this offer is all about seeing where that is. If it is voted down the company will come up with something better, based on where they think they need to be to get to 50%+1.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 09-07-2015, 02:46 AM
  #9624  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Exactly about the 50%+1. If this gets passed by a wide margin then the company has not done their job. We only get what we negotiate, not what we deserve. Every company gives you the doom and gloom scenario, and pilots fall for it EVERY time even though historically what really happens is the company gives the pilots something better and the company proposers. This managemt knows exactly what they're doing and have a lot of experience manipulating labor. They have the new planes, they now have tons of cash. In this climate, they can bill the mainline partners pretty much whatever they want because nobody can do the flying. They will do almost anything to keep the gravy train rolling that's why they wanted to get something done quickly. Like it's been said before, look at the FAs, they are all replaceable that's why they're still trying to negotiate with the company on things pilots have had for years. Why do you suppose that's the case for them but we reached some kind of deal quickly?
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 04:30 PM
  #9625  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4 View Post
They have the new planes, they now have tons of cash. In this climate, they can bill the mainline partners pretty much whatever they want because nobody can do the flying. They will do almost anything to keep the gravy train rolling that's why they wanted to get something done quickly.
New planes??? What the hell are you talking about?? We don't have any new planes. All we have are beaten up/**** stained flying outhouses.. The ones we got form Eagle and ExpressJet are now in the worst shape ever. Multiple MELs, its ridiculous... If anyone votes yes on this TA, they're a sucker..
TransMISTAKE is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:04 PM
  #9626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,033
Default

Originally Posted by TransMISTAKE View Post
New planes??? What the hell are you talking about?? We don't have any new planes. All we have are beaten up/**** stained flying outhouses.. The ones we got form Eagle and ExpressJet are now in the worst shape ever. Multiple MELs, its ridiculous... If anyone votes yes on this TA, they're a sucker..
As much of a sucker as you were for paying money for that education you supposedly received?
CBreezy is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:11 PM
  #9627  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
As much of a sucker as you were for paying money for that education you supposedly received?
I didn't pay a dime.. Your MOM put me through school..
TransMISTAKE is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:15 PM
  #9628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ILOVELAMP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Quarantined
Posts: 167
Default

How about that RSV grid!??
ILOVELAMP is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:18 PM
  #9629  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 44
Default

Originally Posted by ILOVELAMP View Post
How about that RSV grid!??
Yep, it seems NO ONE wants to work here anymore... Unbelievable, I've never seen this amount of movement...
TransMISTAKE is offline  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:22 PM
  #9630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,033
Default

Originally Posted by TransMISTAKE View Post
Yep, it seems NO ONE wants to work here anymore... Unbelievable, I've never seen this amount of movement...
That's what it looked like in winter of 2013-14
CBreezy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
forgot to bid
Major
37
02-27-2020 08:58 PM
rballTy
Part 135
5
02-17-2020 02:21 PM
fastmulti
GoJet
129
07-08-2010 06:20 PM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices