Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Union Talk (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/)
-   -   anti-union (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/union-talk/38465-anti-union.html)

TheDashRocks 05-02-2009 06:54 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 603888)
I have two problems with my union flying job.

1. The pay isn't incentive based and I feel like I'm back in the socialist military style of a paycheck -- longevity based. No matter what, it all pays the same....you have no incentive or desire to do a great job other than "its good for the company, its good for you".

A true professional does a good job out of self-pride. Incentives are awesome, but a person who will not perform well without them is a slug. Unions are willing to work with management to create incentive programs. Without unions, your pay might well be tied to your ability to brown-nose your supervisor.

2. I think the unions...breed incompetence ... and in some cases, hide it from management.

Without unions, managers might hide the incompetence of their buddies. In your situation, at least you have seniority and a union contract to protect you from harassment should you chose to start raising hell about an incompetent pilot.

iceman49 05-02-2009 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 603888)
I have two problems with my union flying job.

1. The pay isn't incentive based and I feel like I'm back in the socialist military style of a paycheck -- longevity based. No matter what, it all pays the same, as long as you are "safe". :( Yes, I understand there could be safety problems tied to incentives, but you have no incentive or desire to do a great job other than "its good for the company, its good for you". And it also seems that many of the union guys breed hatred for management and/or the company itself.

2. I think the unions have done a lot for safety, but I also think they breed incompetence ... and in some cases, hide it from management. My personal story... Flew with a Captain that absolutely scared the living daylights out of me, many times over on a 4-day trip (I will not get into details here). When I went to "pro standards",they were well aware of this guy. However, whenever they talk to this guy, or give him a no-notice eval, he miraculously cleans up his act, does things by the book, and is untouchable. The only way to catch this guy would be to install cameras. Oh wait, can't do that (thanks union). Or perhaps, to secretly have an FO who plays up being a line guy, but is really a check airman. But something tells me the union would have grave issues with that as well. So, this guy gets away with some very very bad stuff.

If you have a problem with the pilot...try professional standards at the union. We had the same guys in the military...instead of flying they would do a desk job and come out for currency and scare everyone. Worked with unions and without, over 25+ years found its much better with the union than without...and company unions are worse than no union.

steak pilot 05-02-2009 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by FlyingNasaForm (Post 585173)
I'm anti-union only because I believe in the free market....

What do unions and the "free market" have to do with each other?

The free maket is letting business take its own course without interfierence from government; supply and demand. It is only a theoretical term, that means no regulation, no subsodization, and no governmental monopiloies.

Steak

FlyingNasaForm 05-02-2009 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by steak pilot (Post 604709)
What do unions and the "free market" have to do with each other?

The free maket is letting business take its own course without interfierence from government; supply and demand. It is only a theoretical term, that means no regulation, no subsodization, and no governmental monopiloies.

Steak

Labor is a commodity that has a price, just like steel, cattle, gold, even money (interest rates).

Its price (our wages) is set through the market place. Unions interfere with this to some extent.

Airbum 05-03-2009 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 603888)
I have two problems with my union flying job.

1. The pay isn't incentive based and I feel like I'm back in the socialist military style of a paycheck -- longevity based. No matter what, it all pays the same, as long as you are "safe". :( Yes, I understand there could be safety problems tied to incentives, but you have no incentive or desire to do a great job other than "its good for the company, its good for you". And it also seems that many of the union guys breed hatred for management and/or the company itself.

f.

Incentive pay for what exactly? Although your company pays you they do not certify you. Meaning .... they pay you to follow the rules of the FAA. The FAA is the one who qualifies you for your position and determines if you can continue working. Your job is not rushing to block out on time, it is not to be more concerned with fuel burn then safety, and its not to be concerned with the operating profits of your specific leg. The pilots job is described in the FAR's and I can't find those items in them.

If and when you EVER have a accident or incident one will quickly find out if that on time block out , on time arrive or making the approach work to improve company profits will carry any weight in the investigation. Clarity will quickly arrive as to who has who's back covered.

Work hard for your company, do the right thing. And sometimes that is telling your company no. The union provides protection for the pilot to do what the company really needs him to do.

KC10 FATboy 05-03-2009 04:26 PM


Originally Posted by Airbum (Post 604937)
Incentive pay for what exactly? Although your company pays you they do not certify you. Meaning .... they pay you to follow the rules of the FAA. The FAA is the one who qualifies you for your position and determines if you can continue working. Your job is not rushing to block out on time, it is not to be more concerned with fuel burn then safety, and its not to be concerned with the operating profits of your specific leg. The pilots job is described in the FAR's and I can't find those items in them.

If and when you EVER have a accident or incident one will quickly find out if that on time block out , on time arrive or making the approach work to improve company profits will carry any weight in the investigation. Clarity will quickly arrive as to who has who's back covered.

Work hard for your company, do the right thing. And sometimes that is telling your company no. The union provides protection for the pilot to do what the company really needs him to do.

My company trained me and they certified me. The LCA who gave me my initial linecheck is a LCA, who also flies and works for my company. And they keep certifying me by the occasional LCA in the jumpseat.

They could certainly create an incentive based structure based on the results of your linechecks, instructional rides, and observations. But all parties involved wouldn't go for this -- it would mean a bunch of work for what? (to give pilots more money). They would be nuts to do this.

My comment about why I didn't like about my union flying job is just that. I never advocated comprimising safety or rushing. There are other metrics they could measure besides on time arrivals/departures, as stated above, but they're not.

Airbum 05-03-2009 06:27 PM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 605132)
My company trained me and they certified me. The LCA who gave me my initial linecheck is a LCA, who also flies and works for my company. And they keep certifying me by the occasional LCA in the jumpseat.

t.

Fatboy, the LCA ( Line check airman?) is acting as a representative of FAA. The only authority that dude has was given to him by the FAA and can be taken away by the FAA the minute the FAA thinks he is doing things they don't like.

You where in fact certified by the FAA not XYZ airline. A pilots certificate is issued by the DOT as are any applicable ratings. Nowhere on a ATP certificate does it state the airline for which one is currently working.

JetDaily 05-03-2009 06:33 PM


Originally Posted by Airbum (Post 605190)
Fatboy, the LCA ( Line check airman?) is acting as a representative of FAA. The only authority that dude has was given to him by the FAA and can be taken away by the FAA the minute the FAA thinks he is doing things they don't like.

You where in fact certified by the FAA not XYZ airline. A pilots certificate is issued by the DOT as are any applicable ratings. Nowhere on a ATP certificate does it state the airline for which one is currently working.

....and the LCA abides by the regs that the fed gov't put in place....and the LCA trains and certifies pilots according to the standards put out by the FAA. The gov't certifies pilots.

Airbum has it EXACTLY right! KC10FATboy, wake up!

Have a nice week, y'all! :)

HectorD 05-03-2009 06:52 PM

If most airline administrations knew what they where doing, there wouldn't be a need for unions, apparently, that is not the case. ;)

1515greenlight 05-04-2009 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by HectorD (Post 605207)
If most airline administrations knew what they where doing, there wouldn't be a need for unions, apparently, that is not the case. ;)

Dead right...

A long time ago, a wise man I knew said; "managements get the unions they deserve."

It was my late dad, a staunch anti union banker. Until Frank Lorenzo came along...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands