Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United Agent Cancels Man's Trip For Taping Ar >

United Agent Cancels Man's Trip For Taping Ar

Search
Notices

United Agent Cancels Man's Trip For Taping Ar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2017, 08:06 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default United Agent Cancels Man's Trip For Taping Ar

Seems like everyone is trying to jump on the video recording airline employee bandwagon. I think we need to get used to this being the new normal. Certain passengers are going to be recording all our moves.

United Agent Cancels Man's Trip For Taping Argument | NBC Bay Area
Nevjets is offline  
Old 05-11-2017, 08:53 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Blackbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Bus FO
Posts: 250
Default

This is what happens when for years gate agents were given all the power at United.
Blackbird is offline  
Old 05-11-2017, 09:01 PM
  #3  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Vertical video fail
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 06:27 AM
  #4  
Not at work
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 737 ca
Posts: 293
Default

Never mind the fact the agent was on the phone with a customer and he was dealing with another agent, or that in Louisiana there is a law against wire tapping without consent, recording a phone call is wiretapping if there is audio, or that the man was intoxicated. nope, its all the agents fault... gmafb.. This crap needs to stop.
blockplus is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 09:07 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by blockplus View Post
Never mind the fact the agent was on the phone with a customer and he was dealing with another agent, or that in Louisiana there is a law against wire tapping without consent, recording a phone call is wiretapping if there is audio, or that the man was intoxicated. nope, its all the agents fault... gmafb.. This crap needs to stop.
OK so the guy was guilty of felonious douchbaggery, agreed.

The issue of an agent canceling a flight BECAUSE the guy was a douche needs to be reviewed. We all know the media doesn't report facts, and the answer could as simple as he was drunk, therefore not getting on another jet that day. Did the agent act on their own vs. having corporate guidance?

Be careful out there, seems like there's a growing crowd looking for a payday via Twitter justice.

Calm, Firm, Professional.....and be right. Kinda sucks but in the back of your mind be thinking about how this will look on YouTube
awax is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 10:56 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
robthree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777, sofa
Posts: 1,183
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
OK so the guy was guilty of felonious douchbaggery, agreed.

The issue of an agent canceling a flight BECAUSE the guy was a douche needs to be reviewed. We all know the media doesn't report facts, and the answer could as simple as he was drunk, therefore not getting on another jet that day. Did the agent act on their own vs. having corporate guidance?

Be careful out there, seems like there's a growing crowd looking for a payday via Twitter justice.

Calm, Firm, Professional.....and be right. Kinda sucks but in the back of your mind be thinking about how this will look on YouTube

+1


We also need to be self aware here. Our opinions are only slightly more informed than the media's. We know more about a gate agents job than John Q. Public. But that doesn't mean we know the gate agent's job. Nor do we know any more about the actual event than reported in the media we denigrate.

Just saying more thought and less furor may be appropriate. If only in real life, because of course flaming all parties involved is more fun on an anonymous message board.
robthree is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 11:25 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 400
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
OK so the guy was guilty of felonious douchbaggery, agreed.

The issue of an agent canceling a flight BECAUSE the guy was a douche needs to be reviewed. We all know the media doesn't report facts, and the answer could as simple as he was drunk, therefore not getting on another jet that day. Did the agent act on their own vs. having corporate guidance?

Be careful out there, seems like there's a growing crowd looking for a payday via Twitter justice.

Calm, Firm, Professional.....and be right. Kinda sucks but in the back of your mind be thinking about how this will look on YouTube
The guy was drunk and disorderly. That's why he was removed from his flight and the airport.
Mover is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 12:45 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Originally Posted by Mover View Post
The guy was drunk and disorderly. That's why he was removed from his flight and the airport.
Apparently the cop standing next to him disagrees with you.
WesternSkies is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 12:48 PM
  #9  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by blockplus View Post
Never mind the fact the agent was on the phone with a customer and he was dealing with another agent, or that in Louisiana there is a law against wire tapping without consent, recording a phone call is wiretapping if there is audio, or that the man was intoxicated. nope, its all the agents fault... gmafb.. This crap needs to stop.
It's against the law to record people without their knowledge and/or consent in a lot of places.

I would not be inclined to continue a conversation that was being recorded...no telling how it will be edited.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 12:56 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,607
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
It's against the law to record people without their knowledge and/or consent in a lot of places.

I would not be inclined to continue a conversation that was being recorded...no telling how it will be edited.
the belligerent passenger did tell her he was recording and LA only requires one consenting person for video/audio... she could have just as easily called the cops (because he was drunk/irate) and told him "Sir, I'm not going to talk with you anymore" until the officer showed up.
ugleeual is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
24
12-28-2023 09:38 PM
Boeing Aviator
United
9
11-25-2016 12:58 PM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
thor2j
United
78
04-13-2013 06:59 AM
Adlerdriver
Cargo
1
07-25-2008 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices