Emirates North America - the end of cabotage
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
I dunno, security for the nation, security at our borders, tax relief....just some basic reasons.
But, I still wonder why people would have even considered Hil. She is a flat out crook. She/Obama killed those guys in Benghazi....but, you asked!
But, I still wonder why people would have even considered Hil. She is a flat out crook. She/Obama killed those guys in Benghazi....but, you asked!
#23
Be careful though, CBreezy is a self professed open handed master of self defense and destruction. He has the Ninja skills needed to successfully disarm and destroy armed men in close quarters combat.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
I guess you could say Trump killed those kids in FLL because he repealed a mental health/gun law. He’s going to FL though, so we should be good. Maybe he can bring his porn star buddy with him in case he gets bored.
#27
Remember all of the political outrage in the wake of the 2009 Colgan crash? The Frontline program “Flying Cheap” showing how miserable and fatiguing life was at Colgan? Hearings held in DC as Senators and Congressman wagged their fingers and pounded the table. The end result was FAR 117 came quickly to the US airline industry. While it added another layer of costs to US carriers, it was rest requirements based on scientific study that would apply to any pilot. Who can argue with that?
I find it ironic that today any politician would favor a carrier like Emirates. I read a recent a discussion on a different forum where an Emirates pilot talks about having a 126 hour block month in January. How could that be? He explains that in the UAE, time spent on a rest break or deadheading does not count towards a pilot’s monthly cap. In his case, a SYD-DXB flight was blocked at 14:20. Only 6:30 of that counted towards his flight time limit for the month.
Another example from that same discussion was a 16 hour deadhead from DXB to LAX. Min layover at the hotel of 12 hours followed by a red eye to Europe. Another 12 hour layover followed by a deahhead back to DXB. Total flight time counted towards the monthly cap on this beauty? Six hours.
So if the point of FAR 117 was to use science based rest to protect US passengers from the danger of fatigued flight crews, why do they want Emirates flying more US passengers to and from (or within someday) the US? Perhaps Dan Ward can get Congressman Brat to answer that question.
#28
Remember all of the political outrage in the wake of the 2009 Colgan crash? The Frontline program “Flying Cheap” showing how miserable and fatiguing life was at Colgan? Hearings held in DC as Senators and Congressman wagged their fingers and pounded the table. The end result was FAR 117 came quickly to the US airline industry. While it added another layer of costs to US carriers, it was rest requirements based on scientific study that would apply to any pilot. Who can argue with that?
I find it ironic that today any politician would favor a carrier like Emirates. I read a recent a discussion on a different forum where an Emirates pilot talks about having a 126 hour block month in January. How could that be? He explains that in the UAE, time spent on a rest break or deadheading does not count towards a pilot’s monthly cap. In his case, a SYD-DXB flight was blocked at 14:20. Only 6:30 of that counted towards his flight time limit for the month.
Another example from that same discussion was a 16 hour deadhead from DXB to LAX. Min layover at the hotel of 12 hours followed by a red eye to Europe. Another 12 hour layover followed by a deahhead back to DXB. Total flight time counted towards the monthly cap on this beauty? Six hours.
So if the point of FAR 117 was to use science based rest to protect US passengers from the danger of fatigued flight crews, why do they want Emirates flying more US passengers to and from (or within someday) the US? Perhaps Dan Ward can get Congressman Brat to answer that question.
I find it ironic that today any politician would favor a carrier like Emirates. I read a recent a discussion on a different forum where an Emirates pilot talks about having a 126 hour block month in January. How could that be? He explains that in the UAE, time spent on a rest break or deadheading does not count towards a pilot’s monthly cap. In his case, a SYD-DXB flight was blocked at 14:20. Only 6:30 of that counted towards his flight time limit for the month.
Another example from that same discussion was a 16 hour deadhead from DXB to LAX. Min layover at the hotel of 12 hours followed by a red eye to Europe. Another 12 hour layover followed by a deahhead back to DXB. Total flight time counted towards the monthly cap on this beauty? Six hours.
So if the point of FAR 117 was to use science based rest to protect US passengers from the danger of fatigued flight crews, why do they want Emirates flying more US passengers to and from (or within someday) the US? Perhaps Dan Ward can get Congressman Brat to answer that question.
Good question.
I don’t trust any of them.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
You mean the law that took away rights without due process for Social Security recipients?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post