![]() |
Originally Posted by liveupthere
(Post 2573823)
All of the CLE mainline departures are 737. Around this time about 2 years ago, the crew resources guy said it’s all forced flying simply because of the domicile. Hence, no airbus or 757 like the days of old.
There is a rather large maintenance facility in CLE. That is helping out the base. That and I think the loads are pretty good for the flights we have left. I don’t know what the margins are. |
Originally Posted by Regularguy
(Post 2573807)
Do a google search and you should find CAL made a long term commitment to the City of Cleveland and had them build a terminal and provide support. It isn’t about favoritism, there was a lawsuit.
http://media.cleveland.com/business_...%20%282%29.pdf We should be beyond that now. |
$1M/mo for 10 more years.
“A restating of the airline's financial obligations for concourse D, the now-shuttered Hopkins expansion built in the 1990s for Continental Airlines, which merged with United in 2010. United is still on the hook for paying off the outstanding debt on the $110-million concourse; it should be paid off in 2029.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.cleveland.com/travel/index.ssf/2016/03/united_airlines_reduces_gate_o.amp |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2573975)
$1M/mo for 10 more years.
“A restating of the airline's financial obligations for concourse D, the now-shuttered Hopkins expansion built in the 1990s for Continental Airlines, which merged with United in 2010. United is still on the hook for paying off the outstanding debt on the $110-million concourse; it should be paid off in 2029.” https://www.google.com/amp/s/article...ces_gate_o.amp I’m biased but it seems like a reason to use the terminal. Guessing, the local government has made that somehow cost prohibitive for us as they tend to do most things. |
Originally Posted by cal73
(Post 2574062)
I’m biased but it seems like a reason to use the terminal. Guessing, the local government has made that somehow cost prohibitive for us as they tend to do most things.
|
Originally Posted by cal73
(Post 2574062)
I’m biased but it seems like a reason to use the terminal. Guessing, the local government has made that somehow cost prohibitive for us as they tend to do most things.
|
I don’t remember the details but from what I understand is that CAL and CLE had some arguments over terms and money. Rather than give in to what the city wanted, they took their ball and went home.
Even if they force a little flying into the airport, it seems like a crew domicile isn’t needed to cover 16 flights. The CLE pilots are a good group of people and I hate to see the crew base close, but with only a few flights a day, it’s really hard to justify. |
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 2574163)
I don’t remember the details but from what I understand is that CAL and CLE had some arguments over terms and money. Rather than give in to what the city wanted, they took their ball and went home.
Even if they force a little flying into the airport, it seems like a crew domicile isn’t needed to cover 16 flights. The CLE pilots are a good group of people and I hate to see the crew base close, but with only a few flights a day, it’s really hard to justify. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2574179)
They can get four 737s at once inside hangars for heavy checks. That contract was renewed recently I believe, so some of the costing includes planes having to come in and out of there anyway.
|
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 2574189)
Couldn’t a crew just deadhead out after a plane is delivered for maintenance without needing a base? I get the commitment to the city for gates but the crew base seems odd at this point being that we have other cities in the system with many times the flights and not even a rumor of a base. Florida is the exception. That rumor will never die.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands