Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175 >

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Search
Notices

United Orders 4 Boeing 787-9's and 25 EMB-175

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2018, 04:54 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
He did not. My guess is that since they are replacing CRJ 700s, they will probably go to the carrier that has the CRJ 700s being replaced.
This would makes sense. That’s probably why it won’t happen. They are more likely to yank 25 700’s from one regional and then add these airplanes to a different regional. Perhaps they will add them to a regional that doesn’t even have E-175’s. Meanwhile, they can all underbid each other until the winner (loser) is declared.
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 04:57 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO View Post
Meanwhile, they can all underbid each other until the winner (loser) is declared.
^^^
The real answer.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 05:06 AM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
BigDukeSix's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO View Post
That’s also fair, but remember that the work rules and salary at your job and as much under your influence as scope is for the pilots at United. You also have a Union and should be working towards getting your pay and benefits up.
Ignorant statement from a pilot I suspect never worked at a regional when ALPA allowed whipsaws to occur. Maybe ALPA should have mandated that only ALPA regional carriers can fly for mainline.
BigDukeSix is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 05:27 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 142
Default

Originally Posted by ChalupaBatman View Post
My guess is Mesa, which will use them to replace the GoJet CR7s. It'll be like watching roaches fight.
Could be the "investment" in ol' COEX.
JuniorFO is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 05:44 AM
  #85  
ATC retired/121 hired
 
ToastAir's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: 121 FO / glider for fun
Posts: 164
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash View Post
I just got confirmation from my LEC that these EMB-175s are going to be 70 seats only.
With 5 Polaris suites. .
ToastAir is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 05:55 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DG1000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: DCA756FO
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO View Post
Slightly off topic but if United owns the planes and they are being flown on United routes then shouldn’t United pilots have first rights to the jumpseat?
I believe the standing policy “the captain owns the cockpit jumpseat” should be maintained. Not whoever owns the plane gets to decide who rides on it.
DG1000 is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 06:34 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by BigDukeSix View Post
Ignorant statement from a pilot I suspect never worked at a regional when ALPA allowed whipsaws to occur. Maybe ALPA should have mandated that only ALPA regional carriers can fly for mainline.
Whipsawing is ALPA’s fault? Please enlighten me.
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 06:37 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by DG1000 View Post
I believe the standing policy “the captain owns the cockpit jumpseat” should be maintained. Not whoever owns the plane gets to decide who rides on it.
Totally agree. However, there are matrices in place that, barring exceptional circumstances, are followed by the Captain. There is absolutely no reason that a UAL pilot on a UAL owned aircraft on a UAL route should sit behind a pilot for a regional that is not serving the route.
CALFO is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 07:34 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO View Post
Slightly off topic but if United owns the planes and they are being flown on United routes then shouldn’t United pilots have first rights to the jumpseat?
Since most of these planes are actually owned by Wells Fargo, then maybe Wells Fargo employees should get priority by that logic.
Celeste is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 07:46 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Default

Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
Since most of these planes are actually owned by Wells Fargo, then maybe Wells Fargo employees should get priority by that logic.
They should get priority over United pilots. Provided of course that Wells Fargo operates its own airline and then gives its flying to another bank to operate under Wells Fargo name while flying Wells Fargo routes.
CALFO is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices