Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
19-02 Out later today.  Crew Resources update >

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Search
Notices

19-02 Out later today. Crew Resources update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2018, 02:57 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv View Post
It’s 8 million in Newark.
Yeah 800 million, 8 million.......whatever it takes
awax is offline  
Old 09-14-2018, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 255
Default

This is a call for all ORD 320 FO's to move on to bigger and better things. Get those bids in. Good luck. We're all counting on you.
Mudge is offline  
Old 09-14-2018, 04:37 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 42
Default

Hmmm, WHQ is Chicago. No vacancies at all for any aircraft or seat in ORD. The MAX and MIN numbers in every aircraft and seat for ORD show they are willing to lose people without any backfill, in some cases by more than 20. Maybe in 8 years when the new terminals are done we'll actually grow ORD. Pretty disappointed with this vacancy.
Rolan75 is offline  
Old 09-14-2018, 06:04 PM
  #14  
ORD Prisoner
 
ChalupaBatman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by Rolan75 View Post
Hmmm, WHQ is Chicago. No vacancies at all for any aircraft or seat in ORD. The MAX and MIN numbers in every aircraft and seat for ORD show they are willing to lose people without any backfill, in some cases by more than 20. Maybe in 8 years when the new terminals are done we'll actually grow ORD. Pretty disappointed with this vacancy.


Life as an ORD based pilot is disappointing. What we need in ORD is for UAX ops to get neutered and pass that flying back to us. Oh, and a 787 base. I think I’ll ask Santa for that this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ChalupaBatman is offline  
Old 09-14-2018, 06:25 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,190
Default

The city of Chicago is all but bankrupt, bonds are rated junk status, taxes going up, in a booming economy the real estate market is flat/declining, there’s a middle class population exodus... shall I go on? Nothing against the base, ord is by far my fav base to fly in/out of. Smells like Type 1 nine months out of the year... but hands down best controllers in the country.
Grumble is offline  
Old 09-14-2018, 06:48 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

There’s not going to be any movement for f/o’s on the 777 or 787 in the base on the bayou for a long time either, but overall I think things are pretty good right now. Both companies brought strengths and weaknesses into this deal. Others were created as a result of putting the pieces together. I think that we have trimmed the fat and are turning into a pretty lean and efficient machine. Parking the 747 early and shuffling the bases around wasn’t fun, but it needed to happen. This bid is just the beginning of many more to come. We have a bunch of 737’s on the way as well as the 350. All they need now is a modern replacement for the 767. After years of industry stagnation, furloughs, concessions, etc, this is nice.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 09-15-2018, 02:32 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,154
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
We have a bunch of 737’s on the way as well as the 350. All they need now is a modern replacement for the 767. After years of industry stagnation, furloughs, concessions, etc, this is nice.
LOL!
350? Unlikely. And Rolls Royce's engine problems are making it easier to walk away from any engine deposits.

767 replacement? 787-8 for the 767-300. 787-9 for the 767-400. Compare seat counts.
Or the 737 is the 756 replacement, depending on how cynical you are.
Andy is offline  
Old 09-15-2018, 04:41 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Andy View Post
LOL!
350? Unlikely. And Rolls Royce's engine problems are making it easier to walk away from any engine deposits.

767 replacement? 787-8 for the 767-300. 787-9 for the 767-400. Compare seat counts.
Or the 737 is the 756 replacement, depending on how cynical you are.
First, there’s been no noticeable issues with the RR engines on the A350. Second, the 787 doesn’t make a very good 767 replacement; it’s significantly heavier, dimensionally larger and doesn’t make a lot of sense doing the shorter 767 transatlantic routes.
N6279P is offline  
Old 09-15-2018, 05:32 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Schempp-Hirth
Posts: 417
Default

UAL recently named the A350 fleet program manager as the A320 program manager. I wouldn't read between the lines too much, but I think it's a significant impact as to the viability of the A350 program at UAL.
Terrain Inop is offline  
Old 09-15-2018, 07:11 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
oldmako's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: The GF of FUPM
Posts: 3,073
Default

Not so sure that's 100% correct. He's been the 320 guru for a long time. And now, he's been dual qualified (on the bus and the 777) to get him up to speed on long-range international stuff. I flew with him just a few months ago.

All that being said, James isn't holding his breath. In fact, I don't even think he's breathing.
oldmako is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bluedriver
JetBlue
51
09-04-2017 09:45 AM
Days Off
FedEx
56
10-19-2015 08:06 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
forgot to bid
Hangar Talk
5
07-25-2010 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices