Vacancy 19-04
11-08-2018, 12:16 PM
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,120
Originally Posted by davessn763
Then neither should the 787-8. Our pay banding is a joke and so is Delta’s.
So should we pay less for the 764 and 787-8? I’m sure the company would love that.
So should we pay less for the 764 and 787-8? I’m sure the company would love that.
11-08-2018, 12:27 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,120
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Now we’re talking about giving OURSELVES a paycut? Awesome.
Besides it’s not a pay cut if all fleets get a raise but the 777/787-9 and 10 pull away. And the 763 gets a big pay raise.
11-08-2018, 12:28 PM
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
The 763 and 777/787-9 and 747 would have paid more for the last 6 years had we not decided a764 should be paid the same as a 777
11-08-2018, 12:36 PM
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
No I’m not but I’m sure the WB rate was held back a little do to the 764 being included
11-08-2018, 12:48 PM
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,120
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
Negative. The 767-300 was “held back” because the union didn’t want to spend negotiating capital on an airplane “that was going away.” That’s a direct quote I got at a roadshow. The fact that the 767-400 WAS included turned out to be a very good thing when the 747 fleet was parked, otherwise there would have been even fewer of the highest paying CA seats.
All the 764 does being on the higher pay scale is reduce the amount of pilots that can get a pay raise through their career.
We don’t have an intermediate pay aircraft we have WB and NB. In order to get WB pay you have to be sub 3000 as a CA. If the 764 was a pay scale lower then the top of the list would move up and the 767 would become more junior there bu increaseing the amount of pay you get over your career.
But it’s just my opinion it’s certainly not going to sway my vote on a future TA.
11-08-2018, 01:06 PM
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 1,825
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
I disagree as we have more than replaced the 747 fleet plus a large margin of higher paying aircraft.
All the 764 does being on the higher pay scale is reduce the amount of pilots that can get a pay raise through their career.
We don’t have an intermediate pay aircraft we have WB and NB. In order to get WB pay you have to be sub 3000 as a CA. If the 764 was a pay scale lower then the top of the list would move up and the 767 would become more junior there bu increaseing the amount of pay you get over your career.
But it’s just my opinion it’s certainly not going to sway my vote on a future TA.
All the 764 does being on the higher pay scale is reduce the amount of pilots that can get a pay raise through their career.
We don’t have an intermediate pay aircraft we have WB and NB. In order to get WB pay you have to be sub 3000 as a CA. If the 764 was a pay scale lower then the top of the list would move up and the 767 would become more junior there bu increaseing the amount of pay you get over your career.
But it’s just my opinion it’s certainly not going to sway my vote on a future TA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
